Skip to content

The Impact of Resuscitation Quality of CPR Team by Implantation of Electronic Checklist and Alarming System Through Video-recording Analyses

The Impact of Resuscitation Quality of CPR Team by Implantation of Electronic Checklist and Alarming System Through Video-recording Analyses

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02209870
Enrollment
50
Registered
2014-08-06
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2015-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiopulmonary Arrest

Keywords

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Teamwork, electronic checklist

Brief summary

The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been identified as an important determinants for patient survival, yet many studies revealed poor CPR guidelines compliance in real-life practice for both health care providers and lay persons. Common shortcomings identified include an insufficient number of chest compression, too rapid lung inflations, and too much hands-off time. The poor quality of CPR is associated with lower survival rate. Besides, some other problems could be found during resuscitation, such as prolonged intubation time, delayed first shock delivery or unsteady drug delivery interval. These problems can't be blamed on the only person but the teamwork. Certain measurements could improve the performance of the resuscitation team, such as audio prompt or checklist. Methods proposed and improvised to improve the quality of CPR have included CPR assisted devices, automatic driven devices or audio prompt system. However, some of these methods are hardly incorporate with the original resuscitation process since it could be an extra workload. Therefore, the investigators try to provide an digitized checklist combined with visual and audio alarming system, which could not only minimize the workload of chart recording but also remind the team to perform essential procedures in time. Information gained from a video-recording evaluation system had been employed to improve the resuscitation skills. The improvement of resuscitation quality also could be found through video-recording after certain intervention. It can also avoid the interference of the resuscitation and find out other harmful factors to CPR quality.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALE-checklist Group

The patient group after E-checklist system deployed

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Out-of-Hospital cardiac arrest patient present to NTUH ED * Age \> 18 years old * E-checklist system applied

Exclusion criteria

* E-Checklist system not applied * Video not been recorded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
return of spontaneous circulation60 minutesreturn of spontaneous circulation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technical skill of CPR team30 minutesincluding time to first shockable rhythm, no-flow time, frequency of chest compression, successful rate of rhythm conversion, Time to first shock
Non-technical skill of CPR team30 minutesTeam structure and leadership, situation monitoring, workload management, communication
survival for 2 hours2 hoursmaintained spontaneous circulation for up to 2 hours
survival to admission1 daySurvival to admission
Survival to discharge60 daysSurvival to discharge from hospital

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026