Skip to content

The Effect of Feedback Regarding Illness Behavior on Patient Satisfaction in Hand Surgery

The Effect of Feedback Regarding Illness Behavior on Patient Satisfaction in Hand Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02209246
Enrollment
128
Registered
2014-08-05
Start date
2013-07-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hand Surgery

Brief summary

The investigators of this study would like to see whether providing feedback to patients regarding their illness behavior/coping strategies, using online questionnaires, improves patient-physician communication in orthopaedic surgery. The investigators aim to enroll 128 patients.

Detailed description

Psychological and sociological factors are important in the human illness experience, but biomedical factors are the focus of most office visits, particularly in hand surgery. Both patients and surgeons can feel uncomfortable discussing emotions, stress, and coping strategies. Detmar et al. randomized patients in an oncology practice to receive feedback on a HRQL assessment or not during office visits. They observed that feedback on the HRQL assessment contributed to physicians' awareness of healthy issues and patient-physician communication. There was a difference in perceived emotional support, but not in overall satisfaction with the visit\[1\]. A retrospective study observed in patients with local prostate cancer, that pre-therapy HRQL assessment is associated with a better sexual function, sexual bother and bowel function according to post-therapy HRQL scores\[2\]. The investigators propose a two arm unblended, randomized (1:1) controlled trial to assess the effect of providing feedback to patients regarding illness behavior/coping strategies (using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) instruments) on patient satisfaction and patient-physician communication in orthopaedic surgery. If the results of the study suggest that feedback of results from the questionnaires increases patients' satisfaction, such an intervention may be used in the future to benefit future patients. Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the effect of feedback regarding illness behavior measured with Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Instrument System - Computerized Adaptive Testing (PROMIS- CAT) on patient satisfaction. Primary Null Hypothesis: There is no difference in satisfaction between patients who receive feedback about their illness behavior, measured with PROMIS-CAT, compared to patients who do not. Secondary Null Hypotheses: There is no difference in patient-physician communication about patient's illness behavior between patients who receive feedback about their illness behavior, measured with PROMISCAT, compared to patients who do not. There are no predictors for patient satisfaction.

Interventions

OTHERPROMIS CAT Pain Interference
OTHERPROMIS CAT Pain Behavior
OTHERPROMIS CAT Physical Function
OTHERMISS-21

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All new patients visiting the Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service * English fluency and literacy * Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* age \< 18 * Inability to complete enrollment forms due to any mental status or language problems (e.g. dementia, head injury, overall illness).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PROMIS CAT Pain Interference1 dayA computerized assessment of pain interference measured at enrollment
PROMIS CAT Pain Behavior1 dayA computerized assessment of pain behavior measured at enrollment
PROMIS CAT Physical Function1 dayA computerized assessment of physical function measured at enrollment
Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS-21)1 dayQuestionnaire

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient-physician communication1 dayThe research assistant determines whether the patient's coping strategies (pain interference and pain behavior) were discussed during the encounter or not.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026