Skip to content

A Dental Pain Study to Test the Effectiveness of a New Pain Reliever Medicine

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-controlled Trial to Investigate the Single-dose Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of 250 and 1000 mg JNJ-10450232 in Postoperative Dental Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02209181
Enrollment
269
Registered
2014-08-05
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2017-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

dental pain, post-surgical dental pain

Brief summary

To assess the safety and effectiveness one dose of a new pain reliever medicine (JNJ-10450232 at either the 250 or 1000 mg strength) compared with placebo (sugar pill) or acetaminophen 1000 mg after surgical removal of third molars. The primary endpoint will evaluate pain relief effectiveness up to 6 hours after administration of the study drug.

Detailed description

This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic profile of JNJ-10450232, administered as a single dose in capsules (250 or 1000 mg), over a 24 hour period after molar extractions. Subjects will stay at the research center for \ 24 hours after administration of study drug. Healthy male subjects, ages 18 to 45 years inclusive, will be screened by medical history, vital signs, an electrocardiogram (ECG), and clinical laboratory tests. Eligible subjects will return to the clinic on the day of surgery and complete baseline vital signs and clinical laboratory tests. They will undergo dental extraction of a minimum of three third-molars and, if qualified, will be randomly assigned to one of four study treatments for pain.

Interventions

DRUGJNJ-10450232 / Not yet marketed

Subjects who meet the randomization criteria at baseline within 4.5 hours after dental surgery will be assigned to one of four treatment groups stratified by pharmacokinetic blood sampling schedule and by baseline pain intensity level.

DRUGacetaminophen / Tylenol

Subjects who meet the randomization criteria at baseline within 4.5 hours after dental surgery will be assigned to one of four treatment groups stratified by pharmacokinetic blood sampling schedule and by baseline pain intensity level.

Sponsors

McNeil Consumer Healthcare Division of McNEIL-PPC, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects aged 18-45 years * At least moderate dental pain assessed by a categorical scale pain intensity scale and a score of at least 5 on the 11-point (0-10) pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) following surgical removal of three third-molars

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who are not otherwise healthy * Test positive for the urine drug screen * Taking prohibited medications will not be allowed to participate in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analgesic Efficacy From 0 to 6 Hours After the Dose Using the Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID 0-6)6 HoursTime-weighted sum of pain intensity difference by first multiplying each pain intensity difference (PID) score by the time from the previous time point, and adding them together for each scheduled time point within 0-6 hours. Time points included 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, and 6 hours. The minimum SPID 0-6 was -30 and the maximum SPID 0-6 was 60, where higher is better. Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 30 Minutes Post DoseBaseline to 30 minutes post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 45 Minutes Post DoseBaseline to 45 minutes post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 1 Hour Post DoseBaseline to 1 hour post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 1.5 Hours Post DoseBaseline to 1.5 hours post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 2 Hours Post DoseBaseline to 2 hours post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 3 Hours Post DoseBaseline to 3 hours post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 4 Hours Post DoseBaseline to 4 hours post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 5 Hours Post DoseBaseline to 5 hours post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 6 Hours Post DoseBaseline to 6 hours post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 7 Hours Post DoseBaseline to 7 hours post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 8 Hours Post DoseBaseline to 8 hours post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 9 Hours Post DoseBaseline to 9 hours post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 10 Hours Post DoseBaseline to 10 hours post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 11 Hours Post DoseBaseline to 11 hours post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 12 Hours Post DoseBaseline to 12 hours post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 16 Hours Post DoseBaseline to 16 hours post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 24 Hours Post DoseBaseline to 24 hours post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 15 Minutes Post Dose15 minutes post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 15 Minutes Post DoseBaseline to 15 minutes post dosePain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 45 Minutes Post Dose45 minutes post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 1 Hour Post Dose1 hour post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 1.5 Hours Post Dose1.5 hours post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 2 Hours Post Dose2 hours post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 3 Hours Post Dose3 hours post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 4 Hours Post Dose4 hours post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 5 Hours Post Dose5 hours post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 6 Hours Post Dose6 hours post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 7 Hours Post Dose7 hours post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 8 Hours Post Dose8 hours post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 9 Hours Post Dose9 hours post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 10 Hours Post Dose10 hours post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 11 Hours Post Dose11 hours post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 12 Hours Post Dose12 hours post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 16 Hours Post Dose16 hours post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 24 Hours Post Dose24 hours post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).
Duration of Pain Relief After Dosing (Time to Rescue Medication)Completed at time of the first rescue medication (hours post dose), estimated up through Day 2Time (minutes) to rescue medication was measured as the elapsed time from when the investigational product was given until the time rescue medication was given.
Subject Global EvaluationCompleted at hour 12 or at time of the first rescue medication (hours post dose).How the subject would rate the study medication as a pain-reliever on a scale of 0-4 (where 0=poor and 4=excellent).
Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 30 Minutes Post Dose30 minutes post dosePain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Three placebo capsules taken orally
67
Acetaminophen 1000 mg
Two encapsulated 500 mg tablets and one placebo capsule taken orally
67
JNJ-10450232 250 mg
One JNJ-10450232 250 mg capsule and two placebo capsules taken orally
69
JNJ-10450232 1000 mg
One JNJ-10450232 250 mg capsule, one JNJ-10450232 750 mg capsule, and one placebo capsule taken orally
66
Total269

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event1010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboAcetaminophen 1000 mgJNJ-10450232 250 mgJNJ-10450232 1000 mgTotal
Age, Continuous19.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.69
19.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.64
19.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.13
19.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.95
19.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.13
Gender
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Gender
Male
67 Participants67 Participants69 Participants66 Participants269 Participants
Region of Enrollment
USA
67 participants67 participants69 participants66 participants269 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 675 / 673 / 695 / 66
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 670 / 670 / 690 / 66

Outcome results

Primary

Analgesic Efficacy From 0 to 6 Hours After the Dose Using the Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID 0-6)

Time-weighted sum of pain intensity difference by first multiplying each pain intensity difference (PID) score by the time from the previous time point, and adding them together for each scheduled time point within 0-6 hours. Time points included 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hours, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, and 6 hours. The minimum SPID 0-6 was -30 and the maximum SPID 0-6 was 60, where higher is better. Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain).

Time frame: 6 Hours

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAnalgesic Efficacy From 0 to 6 Hours After the Dose Using the Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID 0-6)4.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.783
Acetaminophen 1000 mgAnalgesic Efficacy From 0 to 6 Hours After the Dose Using the Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID 0-6)20.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.783
JNJ-10450232 250 mgAnalgesic Efficacy From 0 to 6 Hours After the Dose Using the Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID 0-6)8.95 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.757
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgAnalgesic Efficacy From 0 to 6 Hours After the Dose Using the Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID 0-6)20.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.797
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [11.42, 21.35]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.06895% CI: [-0.35, 9.51]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [11.21, 21.18]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-16.73, -6.88]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.94195% CI: [-5.17, 4.8]ANOVA
Secondary

Duration of Pain Relief After Dosing (Time to Rescue Medication)

Time (minutes) to rescue medication was measured as the elapsed time from when the investigational product was given until the time rescue medication was given.

Time frame: Completed at time of the first rescue medication (hours post dose), estimated up through Day 2

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboDuration of Pain Relief After Dosing (Time to Rescue Medication)109.0 minutes
Acetaminophen 1000 mgDuration of Pain Relief After Dosing (Time to Rescue Medication)468.5 minutes
JNJ-10450232 250 mgDuration of Pain Relief After Dosing (Time to Rescue Medication)129.0 minutes
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgDuration of Pain Relief After Dosing (Time to Rescue Medication)NA minutes
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups. Subjects who withdrew from the study before 24 hours, but did not use rescue therapy, were censored at the time of discontinuation. Subjects who did not rescue medication during the 24-hour study period had their time to rescue set to 24 hours and were censored at 24 hours.p-value: 0.042Log Rank
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups. Subjects who withdrew from the study before 24 hours, but did not use rescue therapy, were censored at the time of discontinuation. Subjects who did not rescue medication during the 24-hour study period had their time to rescue set to 24 hours and were censored at 24 hours.p-value: 0.779Log Rank
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups. Subjects who withdrew from the study before 24 hours, but did not use rescue therapy, were censored at the time of discontinuation. Subjects who did not rescue medication during the 24-hour study period had their time to rescue set to 24 hours and were censored at 24 hours.p-value: <0.001Log Rank
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups. Subjects who withdrew from the study before 24 hours, but did not use rescue therapy, were censored at the time of discontinuation. Subjects who did not rescue medication during the 24-hour study period had their time to rescue set to 24 hours and were censored at 24 hours.p-value: 0.196Log Rank
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups. Subjects who withdrew from the study before 24 hours, but did not use rescue therapy, were censored at the time of discontinuation. Subjects who did not rescue medication during the 24-hour study period had their time to rescue set to 24 hours and were censored at 24 hours.p-value: 0.006Log Rank
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 10 Hours Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 10 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 10 Hours Post Dose1.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 10 Hours Post Dose1.60 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 10 Hours Post Dose1.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 10 Hours Post Dose3.87 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.30695% CI: [-0.48, 1.53]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.33595% CI: [-0.51, 1.49]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.78, 3.8]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.94695% CI: [-1.03, 0.97]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.25, 3.28]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 11 Hours Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 11 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 11 Hours Post Dose1.03 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 11 Hours Post Dose1.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 11 Hours Post Dose1.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 11 Hours Post Dose3.70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.27995% CI: [-0.45, 1.56]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.29295% CI: [-0.46, 1.53]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.66, 3.68]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.97195% CI: [-1.02, 0.98]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.11, 3.12]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 12 Hours Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 12 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 12 Hours Post Dose1.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 12 Hours Post Dose1.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 12 Hours Post Dose1.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 12 Hours Post Dose3.61 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.32995% CI: [-0.5, 1.5]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.53195% CI: [-0.68, 1.31]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.53, 3.54]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.72295% CI: [-1.17, 0.81]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.03, 3.04]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 1.5 Hours Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 1.5 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 1.5 Hours Post Dose0.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 1.5 Hours Post Dose4.35 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 1.5 Hours Post Dose1.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 1.5 Hours Post Dose2.85 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.21, 4.77]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.02895% CI: [0.09, 1.64]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.7, 3.26]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.9, -2.35]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.29, -0.73]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 15 Minutes Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 15 minutes post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 15 Minutes Post Dose0.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 15 Minutes Post Dose0.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 15 Minutes Post Dose0.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 15 Minutes Post Dose0.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.44895% CI: [-0.19, 0.42]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.61895% CI: [-0.38, 0.22]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.62195% CI: [-0.23, 0.38]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.20795% CI: [-0.49, 0.11]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.79495% CI: [-0.34, 0.26]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 16 Hours Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 16 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 16 Hours Post Dose0.93 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 16 Hours Post Dose1.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 16 Hours Post Dose1.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 16 Hours Post Dose3.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.3895% CI: [-0.54, 1.42]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.76795% CI: [-0.83, 1.12]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.52, 3.49]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.55795% CI: [-1.27, 0.68]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.08, 3.05]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 1 Hour Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 1 hour post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 1 Hour Post Dose0.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 1 Hour Post Dose3.98 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 1 Hour Post Dose1.03 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 1 Hour Post Dose2.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.01, 4.46]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.03595% CI: [0.06, 1.49]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.21, 2.67]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.68, -2.24]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.52, -1.07]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 24 Hours Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 24 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 24 Hours Post Dose1.15 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 24 Hours Post Dose1.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 24 Hours Post Dose1.29 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 24 Hours Post Dose3.47 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.6495% CI: [-0.83, 1.35]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.79895% CI: [-0.94, 1.22]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.23, 3.42]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.82995% CI: [-1.2, 0.96]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.97, 3.16]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 2 Hours Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 2 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 2 Hours Post Dose0.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 2 Hours Post Dose4.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 2 Hours Post Dose1.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 2 Hours Post Dose3.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.92, 4.65]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.02195% CI: [0.16, 1.88]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.19, 3.93]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.63, -1.91]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.10495% CI: [-1.59, 0.15]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 30 Minutes Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 30 minutes post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 30 Minutes Post Dose0.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 30 Minutes Post Dose1.59 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 30 Minutes Post Dose0.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 30 Minutes Post Dose0.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.82, 1.86]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.4295% CI: [-0.3, 0.72]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.08395% CI: [-0.06, 0.97]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.64, -0.62]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.4, -0.37]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 3 Hours Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 3 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 3 Hours Post Dose0.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 3 Hours Post Dose3.84 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 3 Hours Post Dose1.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 3 Hours Post Dose3.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.18, 4.07]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.04195% CI: [0.04, 1.92]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.19, 4.09]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.09, -1.21]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.97395% CI: [-0.93, 0.97]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 45 Minutes Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 45 minutes post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 45 Minutes Post Dose0.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 45 Minutes Post Dose3.22 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 45 Minutes Post Dose0.91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 45 Minutes Post Dose1.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.28, 3.59]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.05895% CI: [-0.02, 1.29]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.57, 1.89]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.96, -1.65]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.37, -1.04]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 4 Hours Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 4 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 4 Hours Post Dose0.91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 4 Hours Post Dose3.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 4 Hours Post Dose1.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 4 Hours Post Dose4.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.87, 3.87]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.07995% CI: [-0.1, 1.88]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.27, 4.27]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.98, -1]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.4495% CI: [-0.61, 1.4]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 5 Hours Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 5 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 5 Hours Post Dose1.01 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 5 Hours Post Dose3.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 5 Hours Post Dose1.82 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 5 Hours Post Dose4.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.52, 3.57]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.11895% CI: [-0.21, 1.83]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.1, 4.16]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.75, -0.71]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.26295% CI: [-0.44, 1.62]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 6 Hours Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 6 Hours Post Dose1.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 6 Hours Post Dose3.04 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 6 Hours Post Dose1.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 6 Hours Post Dose4.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.88, 2.96]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.27195% CI: [-0.45, 1.61]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.91, 3.99]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.01195% CI: [-2.37, -0.32]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.05295% CI: [-0.01, 2.07]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 7 Hours Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 7 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 7 Hours Post Dose1.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 7 Hours Post Dose2.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 7 Hours Post Dose1.66 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 7 Hours Post Dose3.94 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.01895% CI: [0.21, 2.29]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.3195% CI: [-0.5, 1.56]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.76, 3.85]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.17295% CI: [-1.75, 0.31]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.00495% CI: [0.51, 2.6]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 8 Hours Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 8 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 8 Hours Post Dose1.15 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 8 Hours Post Dose1.99 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 8 Hours Post Dose1.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 8 Hours Post Dose4.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.10295% CI: [-0.17, 1.84]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.47995% CI: [-0.64, 1.35]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.85, 3.86]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.34595% CI: [-1.47, 0.52]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.01, 3.02]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 9 Hours Post Dose

Pain intensity is the amount of pain experienced on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no pain and 10=very severe pain). The PID will be derived by subtracting the pain intensity from the baseline pain intensity.

Time frame: Baseline to 9 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 9 Hours Post Dose1.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 9 Hours Post Dose1.69 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 9 Hours Post Dose1.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Intensity Difference From Baseline (PID) Scores at 9 Hours Post Dose3.91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.33895% CI: [-0.52, 1.51]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.29995% CI: [-0.47, 1.54]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.7, 3.73]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.94295% CI: [-0.97, 1.04]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.21, 3.24]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 10 Hours Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 10 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 10 Hours Post Dose2.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 10 Hours Post Dose2.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 10 Hours Post Dose2.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 10 Hours Post Dose5.40 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.54195% CI: [-0.87, 1.66]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.40995% CI: [-0.73, 1.79]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.85, 4.39]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.83495% CI: [-1.12, 1.39]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.45, 4]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 11 Hours Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 11 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 11 Hours Post Dose2.26 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 11 Hours Post Dose2.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 11 Hours Post Dose2.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 11 Hours Post Dose5.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.57395% CI: [-0.9, 1.63]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.44895% CI: [-0.77, 1.74]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.71, 4.25]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.84895% CI: [-1.13, 1.38]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.35, 3.89]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 12 Hours Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 12 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 12 Hours Post Dose2.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 12 Hours Post Dose2.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 12 Hours Post Dose2.53 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 12 Hours Post Dose5.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.7295% CI: [-1.04, 1.5]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.76395% CI: [-1.07, 1.45]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.55, 4.09]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.95295% CI: [-1.3, 1.22]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.31, 3.86]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 1.5 Hours Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 1.5 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 1.5 Hours Post Dose1.01 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 1.5 Hours Post Dose5.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 1.5 Hours Post Dose2.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 1.5 Hours Post Dose3.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.9, 5.84]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.02395% CI: [0.16, 2.09]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.98, 3.93]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-4.71, -2.78]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.89, -0.94]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 15 Minutes Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 15 minutes post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 15 Minutes Post Dose0.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 15 Minutes Post Dose0.52 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 15 Minutes Post Dose0.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 15 Minutes Post Dose0.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.11795% CI: [-0.06, 0.57]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.68795% CI: [-0.25, 0.38]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.49795% CI: [-0.21, 0.43]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.23995% CI: [-0.51, 0.13]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.37695% CI: [-0.46, 0.18]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 16 Hours Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 16 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 16 Hours Post Dose2.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 16 Hours Post Dose2.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 16 Hours Post Dose2.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 16 Hours Post Dose4.96 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.82195% CI: [-1.1, 1.39]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.97895% CI: [-1.25, 1.22]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.63, 4.13]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.79995% CI: [-1.39, 1.07]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.49, 3.98]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 1 Hour Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 1 hour post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 1 Hour Post Dose0.84 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 1 Hour Post Dose5.18 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 1 Hour Post Dose1.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 1 Hour Post Dose3.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3, -1.17]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.43, 5.25]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.06795% CI: [-0.06, 1.75]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.34, 3.17]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-4.4, -2.59]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 24 Hours Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 24 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 24 Hours Post Dose2.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.49
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 24 Hours Post Dose2.20 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 24 Hours Post Dose2.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.49
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 24 Hours Post Dose4.96 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.72695% CI: [-1.62, 1.13]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.86995% CI: [-1.48, 1.25]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.13, 3.9]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.85195% CI: [-1.24, 1.5]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.38, 4.15]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 2 Hours Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 2 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 2 Hours Post Dose1.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 2 Hours Post Dose5.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 2 Hours Post Dose2.53 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 2 Hours Post Dose4.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.64, 5.78]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.01295% CI: [0.3, 2.42]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.66, 4.81]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-4.41, -2.29]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.07495% CI: [-2.05, 0.09]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 30 Minutes Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 30 minutes post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 30 Minutes Post Dose0.60 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 30 Minutes Post Dose2.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 30 Minutes Post Dose0.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 30 Minutes Post Dose1.03 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.14, 2.42]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.3595% CI: [-0.33, 0.94]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.18395% CI: [-0.21, 1.08]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.11, -0.84]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.98, -0.7]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 3 Hours Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 3 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 3 Hours Post Dose1.59 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 3 Hours Post Dose5.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 3 Hours Post Dose2.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.41
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 3 Hours Post Dose5.40 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.42
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.63, 4.97]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.02695% CI: [0.16, 2.48]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.64, 4.99]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.64, -1.32]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.97895% CI: [-1.16, 1.19]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 45 Minutes Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 45 minutes post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 45 Minutes Post Dose0.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 45 Minutes Post Dose4.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 45 Minutes Post Dose1.52 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 45 Minutes Post Dose2.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.94, 4.61]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.03795% CI: [0.05, 1.71]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.63, 2.3]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.73, -2.07]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.15, -1.47]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 4 Hours Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 4 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 4 Hours Post Dose1.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 4 Hours Post Dose5.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 4 Hours Post Dose2.99 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.43
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 4 Hours Post Dose5.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.18, 4.62]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.08195% CI: [-0.13, 2.28]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.69, 5.14]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.53, -1.11]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.40795% CI: [-0.71, 1.74]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 5 Hours Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 5 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 5 Hours Post Dose2.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 5 Hours Post Dose5.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 5 Hours Post Dose3.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 5 Hours Post Dose5.77 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.56, 4.1]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.1795% CI: [-0.38, 2.14]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.33, 4.87]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-3.21, -0.69]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.23595% CI: [-0.5, 2.04]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 6 Hours Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 6 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 6 Hours Post Dose2.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 6 Hours Post Dose4.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 6 Hours Post Dose2.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 6 Hours Post Dose5.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [0.82, 3.39]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.35595% CI: [-0.68, 1.87]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.07, 4.65]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.02195% CI: [-2.78, -0.23]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.05695% CI: [-0.03, 2.55]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 7 Hours Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 7 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 7 Hours Post Dose2.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 7 Hours Post Dose3.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 7 Hours Post Dose2.80 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 7 Hours Post Dose5.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.06795% CI: [-0.09, 2.5]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.54795% CI: [-0.89, 1.68]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.86, 4.46]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.21495% CI: [-2.1, 0.47]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.00395% CI: [0.66, 3.26]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 8 Hours Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 8 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 8 Hours Post Dose2.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 8 Hours Post Dose3.10 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 8 Hours Post Dose2.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.44
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 8 Hours Post Dose5.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.28195% CI: [-0.57, 1.95]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.72995% CI: [-1.03, 1.47]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.95, 4.47]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.45995% CI: [-1.72, 0.78]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.26, 3.78]ANOVA
Secondary

Pain Relief (PAR) Scores at 9 Hours Post Dose

Pain relief is the amount of pain relief on a scale of 1-10 (where 1=no relief and 10=complete relief).

Time frame: 9 hours post dose

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 9 Hours Post Dose2.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
Acetaminophen 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 9 Hours Post Dose2.73 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
JNJ-10450232 250 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 9 Hours Post Dose2.98 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgPain Relief (PAR) Scores at 9 Hours Post Dose5.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.67495% CI: [-1, 1.55]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.41795% CI: [-0.74, 1.79]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.77, 4.33]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.69895% CI: [-1.02, 1.52]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.49, 4.05]ANOVA
Secondary

Subject Global Evaluation

How the subject would rate the study medication as a pain-reliever on a scale of 0-4 (where 0=poor and 4=excellent).

Time frame: Completed at hour 12 or at time of the first rescue medication (hours post dose).

Population: Analysis is based on the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboSubject Global EvaluationVery Good (3)10.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboSubject Global EvaluationFair (1)14.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboSubject Global EvaluationExcellent (4)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboSubject Global EvaluationGood (2)11.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboSubject Global EvaluationPoor (0)62.7 percentage of participants
Acetaminophen 1000 mgSubject Global EvaluationGood (2)30.3 percentage of participants
Acetaminophen 1000 mgSubject Global EvaluationVery Good (3)42.4 percentage of participants
Acetaminophen 1000 mgSubject Global EvaluationExcellent (4)6.1 percentage of participants
Acetaminophen 1000 mgSubject Global EvaluationFair (1)9.1 percentage of participants
Acetaminophen 1000 mgSubject Global EvaluationPoor (0)12.1 percentage of participants
JNJ-10450232 250 mgSubject Global EvaluationGood (2)21.7 percentage of participants
JNJ-10450232 250 mgSubject Global EvaluationPoor (0)55.1 percentage of participants
JNJ-10450232 250 mgSubject Global EvaluationFair (1)4.3 percentage of participants
JNJ-10450232 250 mgSubject Global EvaluationVery Good (3)15.9 percentage of participants
JNJ-10450232 250 mgSubject Global EvaluationExcellent (4)2.9 percentage of participants
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgSubject Global EvaluationVery Good (3)30.3 percentage of participants
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgSubject Global EvaluationFair (1)6.1 percentage of participants
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgSubject Global EvaluationPoor (0)28.8 percentage of participants
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgSubject Global EvaluationGood (2)22.7 percentage of participants
JNJ-10450232 1000 mgSubject Global EvaluationExcellent (4)12.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.1, 1.9]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.07795% CI: [0, 0.8]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.8, 1.6]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.6, -0.7]ANOVA
Comparison: The null hypothesis was no difference between groups. The alternative hypothesis was a difference between groups.p-value: 0.14895% CI: [-0.7, 0.1]ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026