Skip to content

Digital 3D Breast Tomosynthesis Versus 2D in Clinical Evaluation of High Risk Women

3D Digital Breast Tumorsynthesis Versus 2D Digital Mammography in the Clinical Evaluation of Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02209129
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2014-08-05
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2017-08-31
Last updated
2014-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

digital breast tomosynthesis

Brief summary

Patients with a higher breast cancer risk (higher than 17% according to the IBIS calculation) will receive a 2D digital mammography together with a 3D tomosynthesis (so called combo tomo) of both breasts in two views in order to investigate the additional value of tomosynthesis in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* women * more than 17% risk for breast cancer (IBIS calculation) * \> 40y old

Exclusion criteria

* \< 40y old

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tumor dectection rate2 yearsThe addititional value of 3D tomosythesis to 2D digital mammography will be evaluated by the cancer detection rate, falls negative and falls positive results.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Falls negative, Falls positive results, accuracy4 years

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Primary ContactChantal Van Ongeval, MD, Phd
chantal.vanongeval@uzleuven.be+32 16 34 37 80
Backup ContactHilde Vandenhoutte
hilde.vandenhoutte@uzleuven.be

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026