Skip to content

A Comparison of Rapid Immunoassays for the Detection of Ruptured Membranes

A Comparison of Rapid Immunoassays for the Detection of Ruptured Membranes

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02208011
Enrollment
140
Registered
2014-08-04
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2020-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Evidence of Ruptured Membranes in Women Greater Than 15 Weekd

Brief summary

Specific objectives include analysis of performance of ROM Plus® in diagnosing ROM, as compared to Amnisure® and the conventional clinical assessment confirmed by a thorough chart review after delivery. Inclusion Criteria: * English speaking * pregnant woman \>15 weeks gestation undergoing an exam for ruptured membranes Exclusion Criteria: * Known placental previa * Active vaginal bleeding

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Woman's Hospital, Louisiana
CollaboratorOTHER
Clinical Innovations, LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans
CollaboratorOTHER
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* complaint of ruptured membranes * IUP \> 15 weeks gestation * English speaking, over the age of 18yrs old

Exclusion criteria

* active bleeding * placenta previa

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
evidence of ruptured membranesup to delivery of infant

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026