Skip to content

Comparison of Efficacy Between Fractional Microneedling Radiofrequency and Bipolar Radiofrequency for Acne Scar

Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety Between Fractional Microneedling Radiofrequency and Bipolar Radiofrequency Treatment for Acne Scar

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02207738
Enrollment
23
Registered
2014-08-04
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2014-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne, Scar

Keywords

acne, acne scar, microneedling radiofrequency, bipolar radiofrequency

Brief summary

Compare the efficacy and safety profile of microneedling radiofrequency and that of bipolar radiofrequency treatment for acne scar.

Detailed description

Efficacy and safety of microneedling radiofrequency for acne scar Efficacy and safety bipolar radiofrequency treatment for acne scar compare the efficacy and safety profile of microneedling radiofrequency and that of bipolar radiofrequency treatment for acne scar

Interventions

DEVICEmicroneedling radiofrequency device

Microneedling radiofrequency device is composed of 49 insulated microneedle which emit radiofrequency from the needle tip. This radiofreqeuncy generates dermal heat which evokes biological effect.

bipolar radiofrequency instrument gives out bipolar radiofrequency from the hand piece tip. This bipolar radiofrequency generates dermal heat which has a lot of bilogical effect.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* moderate acne scar * mild to moderate acne lesions

Exclusion criteria

* taking acne medication oral drugs within 2 months topical drugs within 2 weeks * taken anu procedures for acne scar within 6 months * taking steroid,nonsteroidal antiinflammtory drugs, isotretinoin * underlying diabetes mellitus, keloid, or any malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global assessment of acne scar12 weeks5-point grading of acne scar quartile assessment of acne scar improvement through comparing the photos taken before treatment and after treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ECCA12 weeksquantitative assessment of acne scar ECCA assessment is established by previous article. this method quantifies severity of acne scar by counting the number of acne scar categorized by their shape. Then, the number of scars are multiplied by weighing factors determined by scar types. ECCA is the total sum of these points. please refer the Dreno et al, Dermatology, 2007;214:46-51
Adverse effect12 weeksadverse effects were measured by Epithelization Scale. ES is the total sum of evaluation of three components after wounding. please refer this article Min et al, Wound Repair and Regen, 2014;22(2):212-9

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026