Skip to content

Evaluating Consumer m-Health Services for User Engagement and Health Promotion: An Organizational Field Experiment

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02206893
Enrollment
425
Registered
2014-08-01
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2015-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Compliance Behavior, Dietary Habits

Brief summary

Introduction Chronic disease is prevalent and costly in the U.S. (Tu & Cohen, 2009). Poor eating habit is one factor that account for risk of chronic disease (Arsand, Varmedal, & Hartvigsen, 2007). Smartphone technology has been promising to improve preventive health outcomes. However, its great potential has not been widely applied to people's eating behaviors and its impact is unknown. Professional and peer supports can improve health status (Elkjaer et al., 2010; Lorig et al., 1999; Perri, Sears, & Clark, 1993). However, the former is usually delivered didactically or passively with limited use of smartphones. There is also little evidence of the effect of peer support delivered by smartphones in the domain of healthy eating. This research aims to study what smartphone technology can do to upgrade professional and peer supports, and to evaluate the impact of these mobile-app enabled supports on people's behavior of healthy eating and user engagement. Hypotheses According to Social Cognitive Theory, we hypothesize the following: 1. Mobile-enabled self-monitoring approach improves users' healthy eating behaviors through improved self-efficacy 2. Professional support improves users' healthy eating behaviors through improved self-efficacy 3. Peer support improves users' healthy eating behaviors through improved self-efficacy 4. The amount of support is positively correlated with the change in behaviors and their determinants Experiment Design The hypotheses will be examined bya 4-month randomized field experiment. 375 subjects will be recruited and assigned to one of the five arms to receive the corresponding tool for diet management at no cost. Arm 1: a mobile App with both professional and peer support Arm 2: a mobile App with peer support only Arm 3: a mobile App with professional support only Arm 4: a mobile App without any support Arm 5: a non-mobile web App In addition to the App usage data, five surveys are conducted at baseline and the end of each month. Respondents will be compensated by $8 and a chance to win $200 for each completed survey. Interventions 1. All subjects receive the following interventions: an education package includes the importance of healthy eating, concept of MyPlate, personalized daily food plans; reminders throughout the study; goal setting capabilities; 2. Self-monitoring provided by an Android App: a heuristic approach inspired by MyPlate to record their food consumption which allows users to record their meals by images and doesn't require estimations in cups and ounces; daily reports and trend reports 3. Self-monitoring provided by the web App: a traditional approach to record their food consumption which requires estimations in cups and ounces, and no images are allowed; no daily reports and trend reports are provided 4. Professional support provided by a registered dietitian via the Android App: the supports include the following: 1. Reply to users' messages regarding healthy eating 2. Provide meal-specific comments on subjects' meal consumptions: one meal per week 3. Provide feedback on the subjects' consumption patterns: once per week 5. Peer support provided by other subjects via the Android App: the App provides platforms for subjects who have the same interest to communicate to each other. The actions the subjects can do in the platforms include: 1. Post images or texts related to healthy eating 2. Share meals with their ratings 3. Like/dislike others' posts 4. Comment on others' posts e Create groups which allow subjects who have the same interest to join Measurements 1. Dependent Variables 1. Eating behavior: a score of healthiness of a meal will be assigned by a dietitian. The scores obtained by the same subject along the experiment compose the subject's eating behavior 2. Engaging behavior: this is measured by the number of meals recorded by the subject in a week. The numbers for the same subject along the experiment compose the subject's engaging behavior 2. Independent Variables 1. Level of peer support: this will be measured by a score representing the number of posts, likes, and comments received and given by a subject in a week 2. Level of professional support: this will be measured by a score representing the number of messages or comments exchanged with the dietitian in a week 3. Mediator Variables: self-efficacy, outcome expectation, and impediments will be measured by survey instruments Data 1. User Survey: characteristics and perceptions 2. Mobile App: time, location, and contents of goal setting, meal entries, communications with professionals and peers 3. Web App: contents of goal setting and meal entries Analysis Confirmatory factor analysis and statistical modeling such as structural equation modeling and mixed models will be conducted to test our hypotheses.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSelf-monitoring via Smartphone
BEHAVIORALPeer support via Smartphone
BEHAVIORALProfessional support via Smartphone
BEHAVIORALSelf-monitoring via Web (Static)

Sponsors

Carnegie Mellon University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* age at least 18 years * Android smartphone users * having internet accessibility on the smartphone during the study period

Exclusion criteria

* currently participating in other similar programs * having specific medical conditions that require specialized diets

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Healthy Eating Behavior4 months after signed upThis will be measured by a score representing the healthiness of each selected meal, evaluated by dietitians. Specifically, the score is composed of three sub-scores: 1) portion of fruits and vegetables (7-point Likert scale); 2) portion of the entire meal (7-point Likert scale); 3) evaluators confidence level (4-point Likert scale). One subject will get one score per week, and hence 16 scores in 4-months.
Engaging Behavior4 months after signed upThis will be measured by the number of records submitted by the subject via the assigned tool in a week. One subject will get one score per week, and hence 16 scores in 4-months.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026