Skip to content

Trial of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Glioblastoma

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Conventional Versus Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy With Temozolomide for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02206230
Enrollment
133
Registered
2014-08-01
Start date
2014-09-25
Completion date
2023-02-14
Last updated
2024-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glioblastoma

Keywords

glioblastoma, radiotherapy, hypofractionated radiotherapy

Brief summary

This study is being done to compare standard radiation therapy with hypofractionated radiation therapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Detailed description

Hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of patients with glioblastoma, 18 - 70 years of age with good performance status (ECOG 0 - 2), will be well tolerated and yield survival non-inferior to conventional fractioned RT, allowing significant abbreviation of the length of the radiation course required for these patients with limited survival. The importance of hypofractionation is, therefore, not in improving survival, but rather to shorten RT duration to improve patient comfort and convenience. This approach is pertinent given the limited life expectancy of glioblastoma and has been used in patients with prolonged survival including breast and prostate cancers.

Interventions

RADIATIONHypofractionated radiation therapy

Sponsors

Cross Cancer Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
AHS Cancer Control Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

1:1, randomized, open label

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Newly-diagnosed, histologically proven, intracranial glioblastoma or gliosarcoma treated with maximal safe resection, which may be biopsy alone if resection is not possible. 2. History and physical examination, including neurological examination, within 14 days prior to randomization. 3. Age between 18 and 70 years, inclusive. 4. ECOG performance score 0-2. 5. Stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids for at least 14 days prior to randomization (Stupp et al.). 6. Laboratory evaluation obtained within 7 days prior to randomization, with adequate function as defined below: (Stupp et al.) 1. ANC ≥ 1.5 x 10\^9/L 2. Platelets ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L 3. Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 times ULN 4. Total serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times ULN 5. ALT \< 3 times ULN 6. AST \< 3 times ULN 7. Alkaline phosphatase \< 3 times ULN 7. Patients must sign a study-specific informed consent prior to study registration and must be willing to comply with study treatment, questionnaire completion and follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

1. Recurrent or multifocal malignant gliomas. Multicentric gliomas, defined as multiple, discrete areas of enhancement on T1 weighted MRI sequences with contrast all contained within one connected region of abnormality on T2 weighted/FLAIR MRI sequences, are allowed to enroll on this study. 2. Prior invasive malignancy (except for non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless expected survival from prior malignancy is ≥ 5 years. 3. Prior head or neck RT (except for T1 glottic cancer), or systemic therapy precluding delivery of concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide 4. Treatment with any other therapeutic clinical protocol within 30 days prior to study registration or during participation in the study. 5. Severe, active co-morbidity, defined as follows: 1. Unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization 2. Transmural myocardial infarction within the last 6 months 3. Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of study registration 4. Any severe, active co-morbidity precluding delivery of temozolomide. 6. Women of child-bearing potential and men who are sexually active and not willing/able to use medically acceptable forms of contraception. 7. Pregnant or lactating women, due to possible adverse effects on the developing fetus or infant due to temozolomide.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survivalPatients without an event will be censored the last time they were known to be alive. Median, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year OS rates will be measured.defined as the time between randomization and death due to any cause.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free survival (PFS)Patients without an event will be censored at date of last follow-up for progression. Patients with no post-baseline follow-up for progression will be censored at day of randomization. Median, 6-month, 1-yr, and 2-yr PFS rates will be measureddefined as the time between randomization and radiographic progression based on RECIST criteria (see section 4.5) or clinical progression leading to institution or change in radiation or systemic therapy for progressive or recurrent disease or death due to any cause.
Adverse events according to NCI CTCAE version 4.0 criteria.Evaluated weekly during radiation therapy; on C1D1 and at the end of every 2 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide; post-treatment follow-up every 4 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for years 3-5 up until progression/palliativeAdverse events will be reported as listings and summarized as frequency tables. Additional reports by grade, causality, and relationship to study treatment will be produced. Incidence of adverse events by stratification variables will be assessed
Health-related quality-of-life as assessed by MMSE and EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-BN20 questionnaires.Evaluated at baseline, weekly during radiation therapy, at the end of every 2 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide, and post-treatment follow-up every 4 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for years 3-5 up until progression/palliativeKaplan-Meier curves and estimates of median time to event, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals, for each health-related quality-of-life scale (overall score of MMSE and each measure on EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-BN20 questionnaires) will be assessed. The difference in health-related quality-of-life between the treatment arms will be determined with a stratified log-rank test at the 5% alpha level

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026