Skip to content

Empowering Physicians With Evidence-Based Decision Support for Pediatric Rheumatology

Empowering Physicians With Evidence-Based Decision Support for Pediatric Rheumatology

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02205086
Acronym
Rheumatology
Enrollment
30
Registered
2014-07-31
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2014-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatology

Brief summary

This study compares the ability of clinicians to make diagnoses with or without the assistance of diagnostic decision support software. The area of clinical focus is primarily rheumatology.

Detailed description

The study uses written case vignettes, not decisions about patients seeking care from the study subjects (i.e., clinicians).

Interventions

OTHERDiagnosis

Unaided: The testers will record a differential diagnosis consisting of a list of diseases and their ranking and a prioritized list of test orders, as well as the most appropriate referral for further evaluation and treatment of the patient. Aided: Then testers will enter the case into diagnostic decision support software and after getting advice from the software, the testers will record the same information as in Unaided, but allowing for the possibility that responses could differ as a result of using the software.

Sponsors

SimulConsult, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Clinicians in various medical specialties

Exclusion criteria

Non-clinician

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measures of Diagnostic effectivenessCompletion of each case vignette (typically ½ hour)Each clinician subject reviews each case vignette and lists their differential diagnosis (Unaided). Then the clinician subject uses the diagnostic decision support software and then lists a revised differential diagnosis (Aided). The match between the clinician subject's differential diagnosis and a Gold Standard differential diagnosis list for each case is measured, looking at rank order of correct diseases and omissions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measures of Patient workup effectivenessCompletion of each case vignette (typically in the same ½ hour as measure 1)Each clinician subject reviews each case vignette and lists their initial workup (Unaided). Then the clinician subject uses the diagnostic decision support software and then lists a revised initial workup (Aided). The match between the clinician subject's initial workup and a Gold Standard workup list for each case is measured, looking at rank order of correct diseases and omissions.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactRobert M Sundel, MD
robert.sundel@childrens.harvard.edu(617) 355-6524
Backup ContactLynn Feldman, MBA
rheumatologystudy@simulconsult.com617-879-1670

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026