Skip to content

Kinematic Analysis: Posterior Stabilized, Fixed Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty With Attune Knee System

Kinematic Analysis: Posterior Stabilized, Fixed Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02204748
Enrollment
5
Registered
2014-07-30
Start date
2014-11-30
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2019-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Total Knee Arthroplasty

Brief summary

A better understanding of knee joint kinematics is important to explain the premature polyethylene wear failures within total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and to help design a prosthesis that most closely approximates the normal knee. Specifically, posterior stabilizing (PS) knees have been found to be associated with lower amounts of posterior femoral rollback, higher occurrence of reverse axial rotation and increased amount of condylar lift-off. The DePuy Synthes Joint Reconstruction's Attune PS fixed bearing (FB) knee system has incorporated subtle changes in its design to address restoration of kinematics that more closely resemble those of a normal knee. To understand if this design is able to effectively restore kinematics in the implanted knee, further in vivo analysis is necessary. This pilot study will analyze 5 subjects with the Attune PS FB 3 months post-operatively using the University of Tennessee's mobile fluoroscopy unit while performing three daily activities, level walking, ramp down and deep knee bend. Since this is a pilot study, there is no hypothesis.

Interventions

Sponsors

DePuy Orthopaedics
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least three (3) months post-operative with no other surgical procedures conducted within the past six months * Between 30-80 years of age * Body weight of less than 280 lbs * Must be between 160cm (5'3) and 193cm (6'4) tall * Body Mass Index (BMI) \>18.5 and \<35 * Judged clinically successful with a Knee Society score (KSS) of greater than 80 * Have good-to-excellent post-operative passive flexion with no ligamentous laxity or pain * Must be able to walk on level ground without aid of any kind, perform a ramp descent, and a deep knee bend (DKB), all without assistance * Will have a DePuy Attune PS TKA * Must be willing to sign the Informed Consent (IC) and HIPAA forms to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

\- Pregnant or potentially pregnant females will be excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Femoro-tibial Kinematics - Ramp Down3 months post-operativeDegree of axial rotation and maximum weight-bearing range-of-motion for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during ramp down activity.
Femoro-tibial Kinematics: Translation and Lift-off for Ramp Down3 months post-operativeAmount of translation and lift-off for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during ramp down activity.
Femoro-tibial Kinematics - Deep Knee Bend3 months post-operativeDegree of axial rotation and weight-bearing range-of-motion for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during deep knee bend activity.
Femoro-tibial Kinematics - Gait3 months post-operativeDegree of axial rotation and weight-bearing range-of-motion for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during gait activity.
Femoro-tibial Kinematics - Translation and Lift-off for Deep Knee Bend3 months post-operativeAmount of translation and lift-off for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during deep knee bend activity.
Femoro-tibial Kinematics: Translation and Lift-off for Gait3 months post-operativeAmount of translation and lift-off for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during gait activity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Max Ground Reaction Force - Gait3 months post-operativeCollected simultaneously with fluoroscopy data, ground reaction forces were obtained using a force plate (fixed to the ground) while subject performed activity. Maximum force measured in the vertical direction measured during the described activity, then normalized with respect to participant's body weight. As such, the data are presented as the percentage of the individuals' body weight that was supported on the implanted knee using a force plate (fixed to the ground) and has been termed maximum reaction force.
Max Ground Reaction Force - Ramp Down3 months post-operativeCollected simultaneously with fluoroscopy data, ground reaction forces were obtained using a force plate (fixed to the ground) while subject performed activity. Maximum force measured in the vertical direction measured during the described activity was normalized with respect to participant's body weight. As such, the data are presented as the percentage of the individuals' body weight that was supported on the implanted knee using a force plate (fixed to the ground) and has been termed maximum reaction force.
Max Ground Reaction Force - Deep Knee Bend3 months post-operativeCollected simultaneously with fluoroscopy data, ground reaction forces were obtained using a force plate (fixed to the ground) while subject performed activity. Maximum force measured in the vertical direction measured during the described activity, then normalized with respect to participant's body weight. As such, the data are presented as the percentage of the individuals' body weight that was supported on the implanted knee using a force plate (fixed to the ground) and has been termed maximum reaction force.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DePuy Attune PS FB TKA
Individuals implanted with the DePuy Attune posterior stabilizing fixed bearing knee system implanted by a single surgeon at least three months post-operative. DePuy Attune posterior stabilizing fixed bearing knee system
5
Total5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDePuy Attune PS FB TKA
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants
Age, Continuous66.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.07
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Femoro-tibial Kinematics - Deep Knee Bend

Degree of axial rotation and weight-bearing range-of-motion for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during deep knee bend activity.

Time frame: 3 months post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DePuy Attune PS FB TKAFemoro-tibial Kinematics - Deep Knee BendAxial Rotation Deep Knee Bend2.99 degreesStandard Deviation 5.73
DePuy Attune PS FB TKAFemoro-tibial Kinematics - Deep Knee BendMax weight-bearing flexion Deep knee bend118.2 degreesStandard Deviation 20.96
Primary

Femoro-tibial Kinematics - Gait

Degree of axial rotation and weight-bearing range-of-motion for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during gait activity.

Time frame: 3 months post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DePuy Attune PS FB TKAFemoro-tibial Kinematics - GaitAxial Rotation Gait1.28 degreesStandard Deviation 2.76
DePuy Attune PS FB TKAFemoro-tibial Kinematics - GaitMax Weight-bearing flexion Gait19.4 degreesStandard Deviation 4.72
Primary

Femoro-tibial Kinematics - Ramp Down

Degree of axial rotation and maximum weight-bearing range-of-motion for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during ramp down activity.

Time frame: 3 months post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DePuy Attune PS FB TKAFemoro-tibial Kinematics - Ramp DownAxial Rotation Ramp Down0.97 degreesStandard Deviation 4.32
DePuy Attune PS FB TKAFemoro-tibial Kinematics - Ramp DownMax Weight-bearing flexion Ramp Down28.6 degreesStandard Deviation 5.94
Primary

Femoro-tibial Kinematics - Translation and Lift-off for Deep Knee Bend

Amount of translation and lift-off for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during deep knee bend activity.

Time frame: 3 months post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DePuy Attune PS FB TKAFemoro-tibial Kinematics - Translation and Lift-off for Deep Knee BendLateral Anterior Posterior Deep Knee Bend-4.89 mmStandard Deviation 3.57
DePuy Attune PS FB TKAFemoro-tibial Kinematics - Translation and Lift-off for Deep Knee BendMedial Anterior Posterior Deep Knee Bend-2.58 mmStandard Deviation 2.5
Primary

Femoro-tibial Kinematics: Translation and Lift-off for Gait

Amount of translation and lift-off for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during gait activity.

Time frame: 3 months post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DePuy Attune PS FB TKAFemoro-tibial Kinematics: Translation and Lift-off for GaitLateral Anterior Posterior Gait-0.8 mmStandard Deviation 1.89
DePuy Attune PS FB TKAFemoro-tibial Kinematics: Translation and Lift-off for GaitMedial Anterior Posterior Gait0.24 mmStandard Deviation 0.67
Primary

Femoro-tibial Kinematics: Translation and Lift-off for Ramp Down

Amount of translation and lift-off for implanted knee in vivo under fluoroscopic surveillance during ramp down activity.

Time frame: 3 months post-operative

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DePuy Attune PS FB TKAFemoro-tibial Kinematics: Translation and Lift-off for Ramp DownLateral Anterior Posterior Ramp Down-1.35 mmStandard Deviation 2.39
DePuy Attune PS FB TKAFemoro-tibial Kinematics: Translation and Lift-off for Ramp DownMedial Anterior Posterior Ramp Down-0.58 mmStandard Deviation 1.72
Secondary

Max Ground Reaction Force - Deep Knee Bend

Collected simultaneously with fluoroscopy data, ground reaction forces were obtained using a force plate (fixed to the ground) while subject performed activity. Maximum force measured in the vertical direction measured during the described activity, then normalized with respect to participant's body weight. As such, the data are presented as the percentage of the individuals' body weight that was supported on the implanted knee using a force plate (fixed to the ground) and has been termed maximum reaction force.

Time frame: 3 months post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DePuy Attune PS FB TKAMax Ground Reaction Force - Deep Knee Bend75.3 percentage of body weightStandard Deviation 11.2
Secondary

Max Ground Reaction Force - Gait

Collected simultaneously with fluoroscopy data, ground reaction forces were obtained using a force plate (fixed to the ground) while subject performed activity. Maximum force measured in the vertical direction measured during the described activity, then normalized with respect to participant's body weight. As such, the data are presented as the percentage of the individuals' body weight that was supported on the implanted knee using a force plate (fixed to the ground) and has been termed maximum reaction force.

Time frame: 3 months post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DePuy Attune PS FB TKAMax Ground Reaction Force - Gait106.0 percentage of body weightStandard Deviation 3
Secondary

Max Ground Reaction Force - Ramp Down

Collected simultaneously with fluoroscopy data, ground reaction forces were obtained using a force plate (fixed to the ground) while subject performed activity. Maximum force measured in the vertical direction measured during the described activity was normalized with respect to participant's body weight. As such, the data are presented as the percentage of the individuals' body weight that was supported on the implanted knee using a force plate (fixed to the ground) and has been termed maximum reaction force.

Time frame: 3 months post-operative

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DePuy Attune PS FB TKAMax Ground Reaction Force - Ramp Down97.2 percentage of body weightStandard Deviation 15

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026