Skip to content

Video-based Consensus Opinion for Hand and Upper Extremity Problems

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02204605
Enrollment
0
Registered
2014-07-30
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2016-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

patients, puzzling, conditions

Brief summary

The investigators would like to determine if there is a difference in patient satisfaction among patients who have puzzling pain conditions and receive one evaluation from their treating physician, and those that receive an evaluation from their treating physician and from a group of consulting physicians by video. The investigators expect to enroll 128 patients at Massachusetts General Hospital.

Detailed description

Before visiting a specialist, patients have assumptions regarding diagnosis, etiology, prognosis, and preferred treatment for their condition. Naturally, some of these assumptions may be inaccurate or incomplete or there may be room for debate and disagreement even among specialists. We are looking for ways to make unexpected and indeterminate aspects of an illness less unsettling for patients. When the hand surgeon's advice doesn't ring true, the patient may lose confidence in that provider. Sometimes the interaction can feel disrespectful and even adversarial. We are curious whether patient's satisfaction with diagnosis, surgeon, and treatment plan would improve if they were able to get an opinion from many surgeons at once. One feasible way to do that would be to show an edited and anonymized video to a set of hand surgeons for their opinions on diagnosis and treatment. Primary study question: 1. Among patients with initially puzzling pains, there is no difference in satisfaction with diagnosis between patients that receive a video based consensus opinion and those that receive routine care from a single hand surgeon controlling for psychological factors, demographics, and initial and final diagnosis. Secondary study questions: 2. Among patients with initially puzzling pains, there is no difference in pain intensity and disability one month after the initial visit between patient that receive a consensus diagnosis and those that receive routine care from a single surgeon. 3. There is no variation in diagnosis between observers (Observers are hand surgeons viewing the visit video and consulting on the diagnosis).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALVideo-based Consensus Opinion

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients (\>18 years) presenting to Dr. David Ring with painful conditions that are puzzling (A puzzling pain condition is defined as Dr. Ring being puzzled about what is causing the pain. Subject eligibility based on this criterion will be determined by Dr. Ring). * English fluency and literacy * Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant Women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Likert Scale for SatisfactionAt enrollment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2)At enrollment
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2)at enrollment
QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand)At enrollment
Numerical Rating Scale for Painat enrollment

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026