Skip to content

Upper Extremity Dysfunction Post Radial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Upper Extremity Dysfunction Post Radial PCI: A Cohort Study Evaluating Upper Extremity Dysfunction After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the Radial Artery as Access Route

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02204423
Enrollment
500
Registered
2014-07-30
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2015-11-30
Last updated
2014-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Upper Extremity Dysfunction

Keywords

Upper extremity dysfunction, Trans-Radial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Brief summary

Trans-Radial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (TR-PCI) is rapidly becoming the gold standard. This is especially the case in primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI), where most benefits of the radial approach, such as reduced major bleeding and mortality, can be expected. However there is very limited research available looking at the consequences of trans-radial access for upper extremity function. The main objective of this study is to provide insight in the morbidity with regards to the upper extremity surrounding the radial access route in percutaneous coronary interventions. Secondary objectives are to provide insight in the consequences for functional status, factors influencing and financial costs of this morbidity, to identify subject who might benefit from early referral and treatment of this morbidity and to generate hypotheses for further clinical research into this matter. The investigators hypothesis is that approximately 20% of the population will experience upper extremity dysfunction after TR-PCI.

Interventions

PROCEDURETrans-Radial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (TR-PCI)

Sponsors

Albert Schweitzer Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Presenting for TR-PCI at the study centre. * The radial artery can be palpated and Doppler ultrasound examination of the radial artery shows non-occlusive flow.

Exclusion criteria

* Currently enrolled in another study that clinically interferes with this study and that has not passed the primary endpoint. * The clinical condition prohibits or hinders informed consent and/or baseline examinations. E.g. cardiogenic shock and cardiopulmonary resuscitation or subconscious and semiconscious state,. * Co-morbid condition(s) that could limit the subject's ability to participate in the study or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific integrity of the study, e.g. loss of voluntary motor control of the studied extremities.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
A binary score of upper extremity dysfunction2 weeksA positive score is defined as the presence of at least a ≥1 point increase in the Levine-Katz (Boston) questionnaire; or at least 2 of the following decreased scores compared to baseline, 2 weeks after TR-PCI: * ≥15% decrease in the DASH-outcome measure. * Increase in VAS pain score with regard to the upper extremity of ≥2 points * Absent signal of the radial artery using Doppler * 10% decrease in goniometry of the upper extremity, with a minimum decrease of 10 degree Strength * 60N decrease in palmar grip strength * 12N decrease in pinch grip strength * 15% decrease in isometric strength of the following manoeuvres: * Flexion and extension of the elbow and/or wrist * Sensibility loss of ≥1 filament of the hand using Semmes-Weinstein filaments according to WEST * 1cm increase at volumetry of the hand, using the Figure of 8-method * 1cm increase at volumetry of the forearm, measured circumferentially 8 cm distal of the medial epicondyle * Compartment syndrome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VAS6 monthsVisual Analogue Scale pain score (VAS) with regard to the upper extremity at one day, two weeks, one and six months.
Successful arterial accessDuring procedureSuccessful arterial access of the target radial artery, defined as the ability to successfully advance a guiding catheter and position it in the coronary ostium.
Cross-overDuring procedurePercentage of cross-over from radial to femoral access
AnomalyDuring procedurePresence of branching anomaly (high radial artery take-off), tortuosity (none, mild, moderate or severe), stenosis (not encountered or percentage of stenosis encountered) and/or spasm (none, mild, moderate or severe) of the radial artery
Access route complications6 monthsAccess route complications, dissection or perforation of radial, brachial or subclavian artery, as evidenced by angiography or computed tomography
Procedural successDuring procedureProcedural success (defined as \<30% residual stenosis at the end of the procedure)
Catheter performanceDuring procedureOverall catheter performance ranging from 0 (very bad) - 5 (very good)
Procedure timeDuring procedureProcedure time in minutes, from guide catheter insertion to withdrawal
RadiationDuring procedureRadiation time and dose, in minutes and mGy
Bleeding6 monthsBleeding events (according to Academic Research Consortium definitions) at procedure and at each consecutive follow-up
DASH6 monthsDisabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measured at two weeks, one and six months
Occlusion6 monthsPresence or absence of arterial pulse when evaluating the radial artery using Doppler ultrasound examination extremity at one day, two weeks, one and six months
AROM6 monthsActive Range Of Motion (AROM) goniometry values in degrees of the upper extremity at two weeks, one and six months.
Strength6 monthso Strength in Newton at two weeks, one and six months: * Palmar grip strength * Pinch grip strength * Isometric strength of the following manoeuvres: * Flexion and extension of the elbow * Flexion and extension of the wrist
Sensibility6 monthsSensibility of the hand using Semmes-Weinstein filaments according to WEST at two weeks, one and six months.
Volumetry of the hand6 monthsVolumetry of the hand in centimeters using the Figure of eight-method extremity at one day, two weeks, one and six months.
Volumetry of the forearm6 monthsVolumetry of the forearm in centimetres at one day, two weeks, one and six months.
Levine-Katz (Boston) questionnaire6 monthsSymptom-severity score and the functional-status score of the Levine-Katz (Boston) questionnaire at two weeks, one and six months
MACCE6 monthsMajor adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as: * Myocardial infarction (MI), according to the Third Universal definition of Myocardial Infarction * Target vessel revascularisation, either by PCI or surgical * Death * Cerebrovascular accident (CVA)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hand centreAfter reaching primary endpointo If the primary endpoint has been reached: * Diagnostic procedures performed at the hand centre * Diagnosis of the hand centre * Performed treatment at the hand centre * Upper extremity related absence of work in days

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactSander IJsselmuiden, MD, PHD
s.ijsselmuiden@asz.nl+31-78-6542039
Backup ContactRoos Koopman, MD
A.g.m.koopman@asz.nl+31-78-6550594

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026