Adult-Onset Still´s Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Adult-Onset Still´s Disease, Canakinumab, Joint involvement, AOSD
Brief summary
The purpose of this trial is to investigate the efficacy of the treatment with canakinumab in participants with Adult-onset Still's Disease (AOSD) and active joint involvement.
Interventions
Canakinumab, single-dose 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg administered subcutaneously.
Matching placebo administered subcutaneously.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Written and signed consent from the participant to take part in the study 2. Men and women aged ≥ 18 years and ≤ 75 years 3. Fulfilment of AOSD classification criteria (according to Yamaguchi et al, J. Rheumatology, 1992) 4. Disease activity based on Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) of ≥3.2 at screening 5. At least 4 painful and 4 swollen joints at screening and baseline (of the 28 joints according to DAS28) 6. If undergoing treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to randomisation 7. If undergoing treatment with glucocorticoids, stable dose of ≤10 milligrams per day (mg/day) (prednisolone or equivalent) for at least 4 weeks prior to randomisation 8. If undergoing treatment with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD), stable dose for at least 3 months prior to randomisation 9. Normalisation period for biological DMARDS (anakinra 1 week, etanercept 1 month, adalimumab and certolizumab 2 months, infliximab, golimumab, abatacept and tocilizumab 3 months, rituximab 9 months, canakinumab 6 months) prior to randomisation 10. In participants of reproductive age, use of an effective method of contraception as well as negative pregnancy test prior to the study commencing.
Exclusion criteria
1. Previous treatment with the study drug with repeated administration of canakinumab 2. Intraarticular or intravenous administration of glucocorticoids within 4 weeks prior to the baseline or use of narcotic analgesics except for analgesics permitted within the framework of the investigation (codeine and tramadol) 3. Presence of another, serious chronic-inflammatory disease 4. Positive hepatitis B antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis C antibodies and/or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies. 5. Presence of a relevant, active infection or other diseases, which entail a tendency towards infection 6. Positive screening for latent tuberculosis, in accordance with usual local practice 7. Raised liver count (raised bilirubin; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥ 3-fold the normal range) 8. Serum-creatinine concentration \>1.5 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) 9. Inadequate haematological findings (hemoglobin \[Hb\] ≤ 10 grams per deciliter (g/dL), neutrophils ≤2,500/microliter (µl) and thrombocytes ≤100,000/µl) 10. Simultaneous participation in any other interventional clinical study within the last 30 days preceding the commencement of the study 11. History of neoplasia with the exception of a curatively treated non-melanoma skin tumour or carcinoma of the cervix treated in situ without any indication of recurrence within the last 10 years 12. Relevant cardiac or pulmonary disorders 13. Severe intercurrent neurological or psychiatric disorders 14. Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) as part of previous treatment with IL-1 blockade (e.g. anakinra, rilonacept) 15. Vaccination with a live vaccine within 3 months before the baseline 16. Alcohol or drug abuse in the past 12 months 17. ≥400 milliliter (mL) donation of blood or loss up to 8 weeks before the baseline 18. Pregnancy or breast-feeding 19. Commitment of the patient to an institution at the direction of an authority or court
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders as Assessed by Disease Activity Score 28 Joints (DAS28) Score at Week 12 | Week 12 | Responders included participants with change in disease activity score based on 28 joint counts and ESR (DAS28) score \> 1.2. The DAS28 score index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value \< 2.6 = disease remission. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and CRP value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-CRP score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value \< 2.6 = disease remission. A positive change in score indicates worsening, and a negative change indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC) | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The 68 TJC included the 8 distal interphalangeal (IP), 10 proximal IP and 10 metacarpophalangeal (MTP) joints of hands, the 10 MTP and 10 proximal IP joints of feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows, 2 shoulders, 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 hip, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Joint tenderness was graded present (1) or absent (0). Total score is calculated by adding the scores, which range from 0 (no tender joint) to 68 (all tender joints). Lower scores indicate no tender joint and higher scores indicate worsening tender joints. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The 66 SJC included the 8 distal interphalangeal (IP), 10 proximal IP and 10 metacarpophalangeal (MTP) joints of hands, the 10 MTP and 10 proximal IP joints of feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows, 2 shoulders, 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Swelling was graded present (1) or absent (0). Total score is calculated by adding the scores, which range from 0 (no swollen joint) to 66 (all swollen joints). Lower scores indicate no swollen joint and higher scores indicate worsening swollen joints. A negative change in Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | A total of 28 joints were assessed for tenderness. The number of tender joints could range from 0 to 28, where higher values represented more tender joints. The change from Baseline to any time points was averaged among all participants, where negative changes indicated an improvement in disease activity. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | A total of 28 joints were assessed for swelling. The number of swollen joints could range from 0 to 28, where higher values represented more swollen joints. The change from Baseline to any time point was averaged among all participants, where negative changes indicated an improvement in disease activity. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | A negative change from Baseline in CRP level indicates an improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | A negative change from Baseline in ESR level indicates an improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in Serum Ferritin Level at Week 12 | Week 12 | LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With Fever Episodes | Week 12 | Fever is defined as an oral or rectal body temperature greater than 38 degrees Celsius (°C). |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The physician's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10 where 0= no disease activity and 10= activity to maximal disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The participant's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximal disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The participant's global assessment of pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximal disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. |
| Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 | The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR value.Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value \< 2.6 = disease remission. A positive change in score indicates worsening, and a negative change indicates improvement. Least squares (LS) mean was calculated by mixed linear model for repeated measures (MMRM) analyses. |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With American College of Rheumatology Response of 20 (ACR20) | Baseline, Week 12 | ACR20 response was defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR. |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR30 | Baseline, Week 12 | ACR30 response was defined as a ≥ 30% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR. |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With Modified ACR30 | Baseline, Week 12 | A participant was considered responder if he/she had achieved the incidence of modified adapted response (ACR30 criteria) of at least a 30% improvement in no intermittent fever and had at least 30% improvement in at least 6 of the following 7 measures: tender and swollen 68-joint counts, participant's assessment of pain, participant's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's functional capacity (HAQ-DI score) and acute phase reactant- ESR. Participant were modified ACR30 responders at a given post-randomization visit if they satisfied the modified ACR30 criteria, respectively. |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR50 | Baseline, Week 12 | ACR50 response was defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR. |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR70 | Baseline, Week 12 | ACR70 response was defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR. |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR90 | Baseline, Week 12 | ACR90 response was defined as a ≥ 90% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR. |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response | Baseline, Week 12 | EULAR response is based on DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP scores. The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, subject global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR or CRP value. A DAS28-CRP or ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value \< 2.6 = disease remission. EULAR response has 3 categories: EULAR Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and a change from Baseline \< -1.2. EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 \>3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline \< -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 or EULAR No response: DAS28 \>5.1 or a change from Baseline \< -0.6 to ≤ -1.2. |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) | Week 12 | Percentage of responders were defined as the participants who achieved LDA (DAS28 score \< 3.2) at Week 12. The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, participant global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR or CRP value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28 score greater than 5.1 implies high disease activity, equal to or less than 3.2 low disease activity, and less than 2.6 remissions. |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Disease Remission and Extended Disease Remission | Week 12 | Participants with disease remission: LDA (DAS28 score\< 2.6). The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including both 28 TJC an SJC, participant global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR or CRP value. A DAS28 score greater than 5.1: high disease activity, ≤ 3.2: low disease activity, and less than 2.6: remission. Extended remission criteria included DAS28 \< 2.6 and no signs of systemic activity for up to two consecutive study visits till Week 12 defined as any of Yamaguchi´s primary classification criteria for AOSD which included fever attacks at 39 °C for more than a week, arthralgia, salmon red, maculate, urticarial or maculo-papular rash and leukocytosis (white blood cells increase) of \> 10000/cubic millimeters (mm\^3) with \> 80% neutrophils. |
| Core Study Part I: Change in Joint Mobility (Degrees of Motion) Assessed by Neutral Zero Method | Baseline, Week 12 | Number of joints with limitation of motion according to neutral zero method was assessed which included mobility of joints (elbows, wrists, shoulder joints, hip joints, knee joints, and upper ankle joints) within the reference range/degree. Response is defined as an improvement of ≥ 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% from Baseline. A negative change score indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score | Baseline, Week 12 | The SF-36 determines overall quality of life assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 contribute to physical component summary score (PCS). Items 5-8 contribute to mental component summary score (MCS). Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 worst-100 best). Positive numbers indicate improvement from Baseline. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Up to Month 27 | An AE is an adverse medical event which occurs in a participant of the study and which is not necessarily in a causal relationship with the treatment the participant receives. AEs include symptoms of illnesses, as well as every unfavourable and unintended reaction. SAEs are AEs leading to death, are life-threatening, require hospitalizations or prolongation of hospitalizations, represent an innate malformation or a congenital abnormality. |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | Baseline, Week 12 | The HAQ measures physical disability and functional status. It has 4 dimensions: disability, pain, drug side effects and dollar costs. The HAQ score is calculated by summing the computed scores for each category and dividing by the number of categories answered. It ranges from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. |
Countries
Germany
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants with adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) took part in the study from June 21, 2012 to May 5, 2018 at 14 investigative sites located in Germany to participate in two double-blind parts - Part I (Up to Week 12) and Part II (Up to Week 24) and one open-label Long-Term Extension (LTE) phase (Up to Month 27).
Pre-assignment details
A total of 36 participants entered in Part I to receive canakinumab/placebo. Out of 31, 5 participants from canakinumab arm, and 3 from placebo arm did not enter Part II, 23 participants entered Part II and received canakinumab or placebo up to Week 24. 7 participants who achieved clinical remission entered LTE Phase to receive canakinumab.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12. | 18 |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12. | 17 |
| Total | 35 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I | Adverse Event | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Core Study Part I | Met one or more exclusion criteria | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Core Study Part I | Physician Decision | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| LTE Phase | Study Suspended | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 41.06 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 | 40.53 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 | 40.79 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 10 Participants | 13 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 8 Participants | 4 Participants | 12 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 20 | 0 / 15 | 0 / 14 | 0 / 2 | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 16 / 20 | 10 / 15 | 13 / 14 | 2 / 2 | 6 / 7 | 7 / 7 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 2 / 20 | 0 / 15 | 1 / 14 | 1 / 2 | 1 / 7 | 1 / 7 |
Outcome results
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders as Assessed by Disease Activity Score 28 Joints (DAS28) Score at Week 12
Responders included participants with change in disease activity score based on 28 joint counts and ESR (DAS28) score \> 1.2. The DAS28 score index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value \< 2.6 = disease remission.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders as Assessed by Disease Activity Score 28 Joints (DAS28) Score at Week 12 | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders as Assessed by Disease Activity Score 28 Joints (DAS28) Score at Week 12 | 41.2 percentage of participants |
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC)
The 66 SJC included the 8 distal interphalangeal (IP), 10 proximal IP and 10 metacarpophalangeal (MTP) joints of hands, the 10 MTP and 10 proximal IP joints of feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows, 2 shoulders, 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Swelling was graded present (1) or absent (0). Total score is calculated by adding the scores, which range from 0 (no swollen joint) to 66 (all swollen joints). Lower scores indicate no swollen joint and higher scores indicate worsening swollen joints. A negative change in Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | Baseline | 5.78 swollen joints |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | CFB at Week 4 | 2.5 swollen joints |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | CFB at Week 8 | 1.33 swollen joints |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | CFB at Week 12 | 2.89 swollen joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | CFB at Week 12 | 4.71 swollen joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | Baseline | 8.0 swollen joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | CFB at Week 8 | 2.65 swollen joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | CFB at Week 4 | 2.5 swollen joints |
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP
A negative change from Baseline in CRP level indicates an improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP | Baseline | 45.55 milligrams per liter (mg/L) |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP | CFB at Week 4 | 17.53 milligrams per liter (mg/L) |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP | CFB at Week 8 | 14.61 milligrams per liter (mg/L) |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP | CFB at Week 12 | 17.05 milligrams per liter (mg/L) |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP | CFB at Week 12 | 28.52 milligrams per liter (mg/L) |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP | Baseline | 57.26 milligrams per liter (mg/L) |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP | CFB at Week 8 | 32.51 milligrams per liter (mg/L) |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP | CFB at Week 4 | 36.74 milligrams per liter (mg/L) |
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR
A negative change from Baseline in ESR level indicates an improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR | Baseline | 44.11 millimeter per hour (mm/h) |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR | CFB at Week 4 | 24.28 millimeter per hour (mm/h) |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR | CFB at Week 8 | 25.4 millimeter per hour (mm/h) |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR | CFB at Week 12 | 15.85 millimeter per hour (mm/h) |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR | CFB at Week 12 | 22.41 millimeter per hour (mm/h) |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR | Baseline | 38.82 millimeter per hour (mm/h) |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR | CFB at Week 8 | 25.25 millimeter per hour (mm/h) |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR | CFB at Week 4 | 38.6 millimeter per hour (mm/h) |
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score
The participant's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximal disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | Baseline | 6.08 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | CFB at Week 4 | 3.78 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | CFB at Week 8 | 2.84 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | CFB at Week 12 | 3.63 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | CFB at Week 12 | 4.32 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | Baseline | 5.85 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | CFB at Week 8 | 4.58 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | CFB at Week 4 | 4.74 score on a scale |
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score
The participant's global assessment of pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximal disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score | Baseline | 6.61 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score | CFB at Week 4 | 3.61 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score | CFB at Week 8 | 2.73 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score | CFB at Week 12 | 3.71 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score | CFB at Week 12 | 4.25 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score | Baseline | 6.35 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score | CFB at Week 8 | 4.18 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score | CFB at Week 4 | 4.85 score on a scale |
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score
The physician's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10 where 0= no disease activity and 10= activity to maximal disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | Baseline | 5.5 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | CFB at Week 4 | 3.06 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | CFB at Week 8 | 2.72 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | CFB at Week 12 | 2.86 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | CFB at Week 12 | 4.26 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | Baseline | 6.0 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | CFB at Week 8 | 3.56 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | CFB at Week 4 | 3.67 score on a scale |
Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC)
The 68 TJC included the 8 distal interphalangeal (IP), 10 proximal IP and 10 metacarpophalangeal (MTP) joints of hands, the 10 MTP and 10 proximal IP joints of feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows, 2 shoulders, 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 hip, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Joint tenderness was graded present (1) or absent (0). Total score is calculated by adding the scores, which range from 0 (no tender joint) to 68 (all tender joints). Lower scores indicate no tender joint and higher scores indicate worsening tender joints. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC) | Baseline | 8.89 tender joints |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC) | CFB at Week 4 | 5.33 tender joints |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC) | CFB at Week 8 | 3.72 tender joints |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC) | CFB at Week 12 | 4.66 tender joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC) | CFB at Week 12 | 6.9 tender joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC) | Baseline | 11.18 tender joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC) | CFB at Week 8 | 5.1 tender joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC) | CFB at Week 4 | 5.85 tender joints |
Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score
The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and CRP value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-CRP score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value \< 2.6 = disease remission. A positive change in score indicates worsening, and a negative change indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score | CFB at Week 4 | 3.4 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score | Baseline | 5.0 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score | CFB at Week 8 | 2.8 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score | CFB at Week 12 | 3.31 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score | CFB at Week 12 | 4.01 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score | CFB at Week 8 | 3.81 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score | Baseline | 5.07 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score | CFB at Week 4 | 4.01 score on a scale |
Core Study Part I: CFB in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
The HAQ measures physical disability and functional status. It has 4 dimensions: disability, pain, drug side effects and dollar costs. The HAQ score is calculated by summing the computed scores for each category and dividing by the number of categories answered. It ranges from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | Baseline | 1.31 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | CFB at Week 12 | 0.69 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | Baseline | 1.29 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | CFB at Week 12 | 0.98 score on a scale |
Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score
The SF-36 determines overall quality of life assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 contribute to physical component summary score (PCS). Items 5-8 contribute to mental component summary score (MCS). Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 worst-100 best). Positive numbers indicate improvement from Baseline. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score | SF-36 Physical: Baseline | 29.39 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score | SF-36 Physical: CFB at Week 12 | 41.03 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score | SF-36 Mental: Baseline | 37.8 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score | SF-36 Mental: CFB at Week 12 | 43.47 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score | SF-36 Mental: CFB at Week 12 | 49.82 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score | SF-36 Physical: Baseline | 28.73 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score | SF-36 Mental: Baseline | 46.31 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score | SF-36 Physical: CFB at Week 12 | 33.45 score on a scale |
Core Study Part I: CFB in Serum Ferritin Level at Week 12
LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in Serum Ferritin Level at Week 12 | 466.9 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in Serum Ferritin Level at Week 12 | 634.71 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) |
Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC
A total of 28 joints were assessed for swelling. The number of swollen joints could range from 0 to 28, where higher values represented more swollen joints. The change from Baseline to any time point was averaged among all participants, where negative changes indicated an improvement in disease activity. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC | Baseline | 4.97 swollen joints |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC | CFB at Week 4 | 2.11 swollen joints |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC | CFB at Week 8 | 0.83 swollen joints |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC | CFB at Week 12 | 2.28 swollen joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC | CFB at Week 12 | 4.51 swollen joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC | Baseline | 6.29 swollen joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC | CFB at Week 8 | 2.79 swollen joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC | CFB at Week 4 | 2.47 swollen joints |
Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC
A total of 28 joints were assessed for tenderness. The number of tender joints could range from 0 to 28, where higher values represented more tender joints. The change from Baseline to any time points was averaged among all participants, where negative changes indicated an improvement in disease activity. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC | Baseline | 6.78 tender joints |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC | CFB at Week 4 | 3.67 tender joints |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC | CFB at Week 8 | 2.39 tender joints |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC | CFB at Week 12 | 3.47 tender joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC | CFB at Week 12 | 4.43 tender joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC | Baseline | 7.24 tender joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC | CFB at Week 8 | 3.85 tender joints |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC | CFB at Week 4 | 4.29 tender joints |
Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score
The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR value.Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value \< 2.6 = disease remission. A positive change in score indicates worsening, and a negative change indicates improvement. Least squares (LS) mean was calculated by mixed linear model for repeated measures (MMRM) analyses.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score | Baseline | 5.37 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score | CFB at Week 4 | 3.56 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score | CFB at Week 8 | 2.86 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score | CFB at Week 12 | 3.1 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score | CFB at Week 12 | 4.0 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score | Baseline | 5.3 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score | CFB at Week 8 | 3.92 score on a scale |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score | CFB at Week 4 | 4.27 score on a scale |
Core Study Part I: Change in Joint Mobility (Degrees of Motion) Assessed by Neutral Zero Method
Number of joints with limitation of motion according to neutral zero method was assessed which included mobility of joints (elbows, wrists, shoulder joints, hip joints, knee joints, and upper ankle joints) within the reference range/degree. Response is defined as an improvement of ≥ 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% from Baseline. A negative change score indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Change in Joint Mobility (Degrees of Motion) Assessed by Neutral Zero Method | Baseline | 4.94 degrees |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Change in Joint Mobility (Degrees of Motion) Assessed by Neutral Zero Method | Week 12 | 5.37 degrees |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Change in Joint Mobility (Degrees of Motion) Assessed by Neutral Zero Method | Baseline | 6.29 degrees |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Change in Joint Mobility (Degrees of Motion) Assessed by Neutral Zero Method | Week 12 | 6.05 degrees |
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Disease Remission and Extended Disease Remission
Participants with disease remission: LDA (DAS28 score\< 2.6). The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including both 28 TJC an SJC, participant global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR or CRP value. A DAS28 score greater than 5.1: high disease activity, ≤ 3.2: low disease activity, and less than 2.6: remission. Extended remission criteria included DAS28 \< 2.6 and no signs of systemic activity for up to two consecutive study visits till Week 12 defined as any of Yamaguchi´s primary classification criteria for AOSD which included fever attacks at 39 °C for more than a week, arthralgia, salmon red, maculate, urticarial or maculo-papular rash and leukocytosis (white blood cells increase) of \> 10000/cubic millimeters (mm\^3) with \> 80% neutrophils.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Disease Remission and Extended Disease Remission | DAS28 (ESR) Remission | 33.3 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Disease Remission and Extended Disease Remission | DAS28 (CRP) Remission | 38.9 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Disease Remission and Extended Disease Remission | Extended Remission | 27.8 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Disease Remission and Extended Disease Remission | DAS28 (ESR) Remission | 11.8 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Disease Remission and Extended Disease Remission | DAS28 (CRP) Remission | 11.8 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Disease Remission and Extended Disease Remission | Extended Remission | 11.8 percentage of participants |
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA)
Percentage of responders were defined as the participants who achieved LDA (DAS28 score \< 3.2) at Week 12. The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, participant global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR or CRP value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28 score greater than 5.1 implies high disease activity, equal to or less than 3.2 low disease activity, and less than 2.6 remissions.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) | DAS28 (ESR) LDA | 33.3 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) | DAS28 (CRP) LDA | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) | DAS28 (ESR) LDA | 29.4 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) | DAS28 (CRP) LDA | 23.5 percentage of participants |
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR30
ACR30 response was defined as a ≥ 30% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR30 | 61.1 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR30 | 29.4 percentage of participants |
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR50
ACR50 response was defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR50 | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR50 | 17.6 percentage of participants |
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR70
ACR70 response was defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR70 | 27.8 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR70 | 11.8 percentage of participants |
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR90
ACR90 response was defined as a ≥ 90% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR90 | 11.1 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR90 | 5.9 percentage of participants |
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With American College of Rheumatology Response of 20 (ACR20)
ACR20 response was defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With American College of Rheumatology Response of 20 (ACR20) | 61.1 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With American College of Rheumatology Response of 20 (ACR20) | 41.2 percentage of participants |
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response
EULAR response is based on DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP scores. The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, subject global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR or CRP value. A DAS28-CRP or ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value \< 2.6 = disease remission. EULAR response has 3 categories: EULAR Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and a change from Baseline \< -1.2. EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 \>3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline \< -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 or EULAR No response: DAS28 \>5.1 or a change from Baseline \< -0.6 to ≤ -1.2.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response | EULAR DAS28-ESR Response | 77.8 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response | EULAR DAS28-CRP Response | 72.2 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response | EULAR DAS28-ESR Response | 52.9 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response | EULAR DAS28-CRP Response | 47.1 percentage of participants |
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With Fever Episodes
Fever is defined as an oral or rectal body temperature greater than 38 degrees Celsius (°C).
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With Fever Episodes | 8.3 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With Fever Episodes | 0 percentage of participants |
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With Modified ACR30
A participant was considered responder if he/she had achieved the incidence of modified adapted response (ACR30 criteria) of at least a 30% improvement in no intermittent fever and had at least 30% improvement in at least 6 of the following 7 measures: tender and swollen 68-joint counts, participant's assessment of pain, participant's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's functional capacity (HAQ-DI score) and acute phase reactant- ESR. Participant were modified ACR30 responders at a given post-randomization visit if they satisfied the modified ACR30 criteria, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With Modified ACR30 | 55.6 percentage of participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With Modified ACR30 | 23.5 percentage of participants |
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE is an adverse medical event which occurs in a participant of the study and which is not necessarily in a causal relationship with the treatment the participant receives. AEs include symptoms of illnesses, as well as every unfavourable and unintended reaction. SAEs are AEs leading to death, are life-threatening, require hospitalizations or prolongation of hospitalizations, represent an innate malformation or a congenital abnormality.
Time frame: Up to Month 27
Population: Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 16 Participants |
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 2 Participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 10 Participants |
| Core Study Part I: Placebo | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 0 Participants |
| Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 13 Participants |
| Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 1 Participants |
| Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 2 Participants |
| Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 1 Participants |
| Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 6 Participants |
| Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 1 Participants |
| LTE Phase: Canakinumab | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 7 Participants |
| LTE Phase: Canakinumab | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 1 Participants |