Skip to content

TITAN™ Reverse Shoulder System

A Post-market Clinical Follow-up Study of the TITAN™ Reverse Shoulder System Used in Primary or Revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02204228
Enrollment
151
Registered
2014-07-30
Start date
2014-09-01
Completion date
2023-12-14
Last updated
2026-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder

Keywords

osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, post traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis, severe fractures

Brief summary

The Integra® TITAN™ Reverse Shoulder System (TRS) is a semi-constrained total shoulder construct. When used under the conditions and purposes intended the TRS will relieve pain and restore some functional joint motion to the affected shoulder. The purpose of this study is to assess the short, mid and long term outcomes of the TITAN™ Reverse Shoulder System.

Interventions

DEVICETITAN™ Reverse Shoulder System (TRS)

All patients will be operated on with the TITAN™ Reverse Shoulder System (TRS).

Sponsors

Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with grossly deficient rotator cuff with severe arthropathy or Subjects with failed joint replacement with grossly deficient rotator cuff * Subjects with a shoulder joint anatomically and structurally suited to receive the device * Subjects at least 21 years of age and skeletally mature at the time of surgery * Subject provided consent to participate in the clinical study (having signed the Informed Consent Form)

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects without a functional deltoid muscle * Subjects with active local or systemic infection * Subjects with inadequate bone stock in the proximal humerus or glenoid fossa for supporting the components * Subjects with poor bone quality such as osteoporosis where there could be considerable migration of the prosthesis and/or a chance of fracture of the humerus or glenoid * Subjects with muscular, neurologic, or vascular deficiencies that compromise the affected extremity * Subjects with known metal allergies * Subjects are known to be at risk for lost to follow-up, or failure to return for scheduled visits * Subjects who are prisoners * Female subject who are pregnant, nursing, or of childbearing potential while not practicing effective contraceptive methods

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival (lack of implant component removal or revision)2 YearAny implant revisions or device related adverse events must be reported as soon as the event is discovered. Assessment of adverse events will occur at each clinic visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy assessed by comparing clinical results after surgery as measured with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES)2 Year/5 Year/ 7Year/ 10 YearRelative change of ASES compared to baseline
Efficacy assessed by comparing clinical results after surgery as measured with EuroQOL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score2 Year/5 Year/ 7Year/ 10 YearRelative change of EQ-5D score compared to baseline
Efficacy assessed by comparing clinical results after surgery as measured with Range of motion (ROM)2 Year/5 Year/ 7Year/ 10 YearRelative change of ROM compared to baseline
Efficacy assessed by comparing clinical results after surgery as measured with Constant score.2 Year/5 Year/ 7Year/ 10 YearRelative change of Constant score compared to baseline
Efficacy assessed by comparing clinical results after surgery as measured with Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS).2 Year/5 Year/ 7Year/ 10 YearRelative change of Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) compared to baseline
Efficacy assessed by comparing clinical results after surgery as measured with SANE (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation)2 Year/5 Year/ 7Year/ 10 YearRelative change of SANE compared to baseline
Efficacy assessed by comparing clinical results after surgery as measured with Radiographs2 Year/5 Year/ 7Year/ 10 YearOutcome after surgery will be evaluated using the Radiographs and comparison with pre-operative data.
Lack of unanticipated device related serious adverse events.2 Year/5 Year/ 7Year/ 10 YearAny device related adverse events must be reported as soon as the event is discovered. Assessment of adverse events will occur at each clinic visit.
Survival (lack of implant component removal or revision)5 Year/7 Year/10 YearAny implant revisions or device related adverse events must be reported as soon as the event is discovered. Assessment of adverse events will occur at each clinic visit.

Countries

France, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORKarlie Morgan

Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026