Skip to content

Efficacy of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in High-risk NSTE-ACS Patients Undergoing Early PCI

An Open-label Study Evaluating the Acute Efficacy of Treatment With Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel on Myocardial Tissue-level Perfusion Assessed by TMPFC and MRI in Patients With High-risk NSTE-ACS Undergoing Early PCI(EARLY-MYO II)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02201667
Enrollment
444
Registered
2014-07-28
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2014-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Keywords

non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome, myocardial perfusion, magnetic Resonance Imaging, antiplatelet

Brief summary

The goal of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) therapy is to successfully restore both epicardial blood flow and myocardial perfusion. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been documented as being the most effective method for restoration of epicardial blood flow. However, epicardial blood flow does not necessarily equate to myocardial perfusion. Clopidogrel binds irreversibly to platelet P 2 Y 12 receptors to inhibit platelet aggregation, with main limitations of slow onset, prevention of recovery of platelet functions, and interindividual variability. Clinical pharmacology and early dose-finding studies suggested a faster onset and greater and more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. Two currently main methods of angiographic assessment of myocardial perfusion includes thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI) myocardial perfusion grading (TMPG) and myocardial blush grading (MBG). These established myocardial perfusion parameters have been widely used in various important trials and are reported to be highly useful in predicting clinical outcomes. However, visual assessment of these methods is categorical, subjective, and operator dependent of contrast in the myocardium using cine-angiographic frame-counting, was developed by the investigators' center to quantify myocardial tissue- level perfusion and was proved to be a predictive value on clinical prognosis. Thus, the investigators aim to initiate an open-label study evaluating the acute efficacy of treatment with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on myocardial tissue-level perfusion assessed by Myocardial Perfusion Frame Count(TMPFC) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with high-risk non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) . The investigators hypothesize that compared with clopidogrel, ticagrelor can significantly improve myocardial perfusion assessed by Myocardial Perfusion Frame Count(TMPFC) in high-risk non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), without additional increased major bleeding.

Detailed description

The goal of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) therapy is to successfully restore both epicardial blood flow and myocardial perfusion. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been documented as being the most effective method for restoration of epicardial blood flow. However, epicardial blood flow does not necessarily equate to myocardial perfusion; not every patient with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI) 3 flow after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) achieves effective myocardial tissue-level perfusion. Although epicardial thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI) 3 flow could be restored in \>90% of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) , normalization of myocardial perfusion was achieved less frequently, with detrimental impacts on survival. Clopidogrel, the most widely used antiplatelet agent in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), is a thienopyridine prodrug, which is inactive until in undergoes biotransformation into its active metabolite, which then binds irreversibly to platelet P 2 Y 12 receptors. This irreversible binding means that the receptors are inhibited for the lifespan of the platelet. The main limitations of clopidogrel administration include slow onset, prevention of recovery of platelet functions, and interindividual variability. Clinical pharmacology and early dose-finding studies suggested a faster onset and greater and more consistent inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. ONSET/OFFSET study showed that in patients with stable coronary artery disease on aspirin, ticagrelor demonstrates a rapid onset of pharmacological effect, as demonstrated by a mean platelet aggregation (IPA) for ticagrelor at 0.5 h after 180 mg loading dose of about 41%, with the maximum platelet aggregation (IPA) effect of 87.9-89.6% by 2-4 hours post dose. A total of 90% of patients had final extent Inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) \>70% by 2 h post-dose. The high inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) effect of ticagrelor (between 87% and 89%) was maintained for 2-8 hours. Ticagrelor might overcome the slow-onset limitation of clopidogrel and bring extra benefit for improving myocardial perfusion in the acute phase of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) when undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Currently, there are two main methods of angiographic assessment of myocardial perfusion: Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) myocardial perfusion grading (TMPG), described by Gibson et al. and myocardial blush grading (MBG), described by Van't Hof et al. These established myocardial perfusion parameters, myocardial perfusion grading (TMPG), and myocardial blush grading (MBG), have been widely used in various important trials and are reported to be highly useful in predicting clinical outcomes. However, visual assessment of these methods is categorical, subjective, and operator dependent. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI) Myocardial Perfusion Frame Count (TMPFC), a novel and objective method that measures the filling and clearance of contrast in the myocardium using cine-angiographic frame-counting, was developed by the investigators' center to quantify myocardial tissue- level perfusion and was proved to be a predictive value on clinical prognosis. Thus, the investigators aim to initiate an open-label study evaluating the acute efficacy of treatment with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on myocardial tissue-level perfusion assessed by Myocardial Perfusion Frame Count (TMPFC) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with high-risk non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Interventions

DRUGTicagrelor

180-mg loading dose followed by 90mg twice daily for 30 days

DRUGclopidogrel

300-mg loading dose followed by 75mg once daily for 30 days.

DRUGAspirin

300mg loading dose aspirin and followed by 100mg once daily

PROCEDUREPCI

PCI is performed according to indication for early PCI according to 2012 Chinese NSTE-ACS guideline recommendation

Sponsors

RenJi Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

For inclusion in the study subjects should fulfill the following criteria: 1. Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures; 2. Men or women \> 18 years of age, with documented evidence of non-ST segment elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome(ACS) in the 24 hours before randomisation; 3. Hospitalized for high-risk non-ST segment elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome(ACS)(GRACE risk score\>140) with indication for early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to 2012 Chinese non-S T segment elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome(ACS) guideline recommendation.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects should not enter the study if any of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
TIMI Myocardial Perfusion Frame Count (TMPFC)Within 0 to 24 hours after randomizationThe Myocardial Perfusion Frame Count (TMPFC) is developed to standardize and quantify myocardial perfusion by timing the filling and clearance of contrast in the myocardium using cine-angiographic frame-counting. The first frame of Myocardial Perfusion Frame Count (TMPFC) is defined as the frame that clearly demonstrates the first appearance of myocardial blush beyond the infarct-related artery (IRA) (F1). The last frame of Myocardial Perfusion Frame Count (TMPFC) is then defined as the frame where contrast or myocardial blush disappears (F2). TMPFC is therefore F2-F1 frame counts at filming rate of 15frames/sec.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance ImagingAt 30th day after randomizationCardiovascular MRI will be performed at 30th day, to detect microvascular obstruction (MO) and intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH). Infarct size and myocardial strain will also be measured by the method previously described.
EchocardiographyAt 30th day after randomizationechocardiography will be performed within 24h post PCI and at 30th day to assess changes in left ventricular size and function
Myocardial-specific isoenzyme of creatine kinase (CK-MB) enzyme levels peri-PCIWithin 0 to 48 hours after enrollmentInfarct size is measured by the myocardial-specific isoenzyme of creatine kinase (CK-MB) area under the curve, calculated by the linear-trapezoidal method. If the baseline or last value is missing, the corresponding value will be set to zero. For missing values of intermediate time points, linear interpolation is used.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bleeding events: Incidence of bleeding eventsWithin 0 to 30 dys after randomizationIncidence of bleeding events, classified by TIMI criteria and GUSTO severity criteria.
Other adverse eventsWithin 0 to 30 days after randomizationIncluding any other adverse events (AEs) during the study.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactBen He, MD,PhD
heben1025@hotmail.com68383609

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026