Skip to content

Sulphonylurea Receptor Mutation and Responsiveness to Gliclazide - a Pilot Proof of Concept, Randomised Cross-over Study

Sulphonylurea Receptor Mutation and Responsiveness to Gliclazide - a Pilot Proof of Concept, Randomised Cross-over Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02201602
Enrollment
8
Registered
2014-07-28
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2016-07-31
Last updated
2016-09-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes

Keywords

sulphonylureas, gliclazide, glibenclamide

Brief summary

Gliclazide has greater glucose lowering efficacy than glibenclamide among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with minor haplotype (K23/A1369) at the KCNJ11/ABCC gene locations.

Detailed description

Sulphonylurea (SU) is a glucose-lowering agent used widely to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). SU promotes insulin secretion from the pancreatic islet beta cell via binding and inhibition of the ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channel. The KATP channel is made up of two subcomponents, an inner Kir6.2 K+ channel (coded by the KCNJ11 gene) and an outer SU receptor 1 (SUR1) (coded by the ABCC8 gene). Although all SUs are mechanistically similar in terms of increasing insulin secretion, they bind to distinct regions of Kir 6.2 and SUR1 to exert their function. Different types of SU (e.g. tolbutamide, glibenclamide, glipizide, glimepiride and gliclazide) can therefore be grouped by their binding sites (A/B/A+B site) on the KATP channel \[3\]. Interestingly, the KCNJ11 E23K (rs5219) variant was shown to confer susceptibility to T2DM and the ABCC8 S1369A (rs757110) variant was found to be in complete linkage disequilibrium with it i.e. inherited together as a genetic block (haplotype). A recent in vitro molecular study suggested that the minor haplotype (K23/A1369) of KATP channel is sensitive to inhibition by gliclazide (binds to A-site) but not glibenclamide (binds to A+B site), and that the increased responsiveness to gliclazide was largely due to the A1369 allele. Understanding how the response to these two SUs may vary with the presence of the minor haplotype (K23/A1369) would therefore be beneficial for customization of patient treatment to achieve better clinical outcomes.

Interventions

DRUGGliclazide
DRUGGlibenclamide

Sponsors

Khoo Teck Puat Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Type 2 diabetes * Age 21-65 * HbA1c \>8.0% on two consecutive visits

Exclusion criteria

* Currently taking insulin at a regime more complex than basal insulin * Not willing to perform self-blood glucose monitoring (SBGM) * Renal impairment i.e. eGFR\<50mls/min * Pregnancy or unwilling to practice adequate contraception * Taking other medications that may affect blood glucose e.g. systemic glucocorticoids.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean blood glucose level6 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glycemic variability6 daysGlycemic variability will be assessed using the EasyGV software (http://www.phc.ox.ac.uk/research/diabetes/software/easygv/) which is capable of calculating 10 different measures of glycemic variability from continuous glucose monitoring data, such as Standard Deviation (SD) and M-value, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE).

Countries

Singapore

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026