Skip to content

ODEN Trial: Option vs. Denali IVC Filters

Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Denali and Option Inferior Vena Cava Filters

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02201277
Acronym
ODEN
Enrollment
45
Registered
2014-07-28
Start date
2014-05-27
Completion date
2018-04-27
Last updated
2019-09-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Venous Thromboembolism

Keywords

IVC, IVC Filter, Filter, Option, Denali, filter tilt, filter migration, filter fracture, filter thrombus, filter penetration

Brief summary

This research study is a prospective randomized trial evaluating the relative safety of two inferior vena cava (IVC) filters used to prevent the migration of potentially dangerous deadly blood clots from the legs to the lung in patients who cannot take blood thinners. All eligible patients will have been ordered to have a IVC filter placed by their primary medical team and filters will be placed in these patients whether or not they wish to participate in this trial as part of standard of care. The investigators will follow up with patients 30 days after IVC filter placement and ask them to come back for filter removal if medically appropriate. If removal is not medically appropriate in 30 days, the investigators will attempt to schedule removal every 30 days after initial placement. Primary outcome measures will be IVC filter complications such as filter penetration through the IVC wall and into other organs, filter tilt, filter migration, filter fracture and clots formed within the filter. All of these are reported complications of all IVC filters. The research also aims to improve the standard of care for IVC filter patient follow up as the FDA and Society of Interventional Radiology recommend that IVC filters be removed as soon as it is safe to do so. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that there is no significant difference in efficacy and complication rate between the Option and the Denali filter.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized trial comparing two FDA-approved inferior vena cava filters, the Denali retrievable IVC filter (Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc., Tempe, AZ) and the Option Elite (Argon Medical, Athens, Texas). Patients scheduled for IVC filter placement at UCSF Department of Interventional Radiology (IR) will be asked by the IR physician performing the procedure at either UCSF Mt. Zion or Moffitt hospital if they wish to participate in this prospective, randomized study. Recruitment will be conducted by the physicians performing the IR procedures only. No additional recruitment calls, emails, posters or web pages are necessary. All procedures and the randomization to one of the two experimental groups will be carefully explained before obtaining signed written consent. Screening: Screening will be conducted by the IR physician prior to the placement of the IVC filters. Since this is a standard of care study, patients who are recommended for IVC filter placement and are scheduled for the procedure are generally eligible. The screening procedures are part of routine care before IVC filter placement and would be done even if patients did not join the study. The study doctor will review the results of most recent routine care imaging scans (CT or MRI) of the abdomen and pelvis. This is done to confirm that the diameter of IVC is no wider than 2.8cm. Both filters are FDA-approved to be placed in an IVC with maximal diameter of 2.8cm. The study doctor will also review ultrasound of the lower extremity, when available, to confirm that a blood clot was in fact present prior to performing the study. This ensures that patients who present for IVC filter placement are screened properly. The following screening procedures should be done within 12 days before the IVC filter placement procedure as part of the standard of care. * A complete physical exam * The study doctor will ask about medical history and how well patient is able to do daily activities * Routine care blood tests (about 2 tablespoons) o This is to ensure that the INR and platelet count of the patient is within the safe limits to perform an invasive procedure. After Enrollment: If the screening procedures show that the patient is eligible and consents to take part in the study, IVC filter placement will occur after randomization. After enrollment, the following procedures will be done during the study: Just as with screening, all of these procedures are part of regular IVC filter placement care. Randomization: Randomization will occur on the day of procedure or prior clinic visit with IR physician to either the Denali or Option IVC filter. All IR attending physicians on the protocol are familiar with placement of either filter type. Prior to opening study to accrual, 75 sealed security envelopes with the word Denali printed on a card inside and 75 sealed security envelopes with the word Option will be assembled by IR staff not involved in the research. The envelopes will be mixed up and placed in a bag. Computerized randomization programs and tables were considered but we feel the envelopes will work best as there may be limited time after patient is consented and procedure begins. This is especially true as some filters are placed emergently. Previous IR studies have used this randomization technique with great success. Filter Placement: Placement of an IVC filter involves the insertion of a plastic tube (catheter) into a vein in the neck. Some numbing medicine (Lidocaine) will be injected in the skin over the vein before the catheter is inserted. Intravenous medications will be given to induce moderate sedation (Fentanyl for analgesic and Versed for moderate sedation). Once the catheter has been placed into the vein, it will be advanced into the IVC. Once in correct position, x-ray contrast material (x-ray dye-Omnipaque 350) will be injected through the catheter and x-ray pictures taken. A series of x-ray pictures will be obtained of the IVC. These pictures are taken as part of standard of care to determine the position of the renal veins with respect to the IVC. The top of the filter must sit below the renal veins so it does not cause obstruction of the renal veins. In addition, pictures of the IVC are taken to serve as another tool in measuring the diameter of the IVC to make sure the diameter of the IVC is less than 2.8cm. This is particularly important in situations when a CT or MRI of the abdomen and pelvis is not available to have reviewed prior to the procedure. Once pictures are obtained and it is made certain that the IVC diameter is less than 2.8cm, the filter will be inserted through the catheter, and placed below the renal veins. During the placement procedure, positioning of the filter will be monitored with x-ray pictures. At the completion of the procedure the catheter will be removed and pressure will be applied to the insertion site until the bleeding has stopped. All of this is part of routine standard of care for placement of the filter. The doctor performing the procedure will be asked to complete a short questionnaire after IVC filter placement which will be attached to Study Documents. Follow-Up: After the IVC filter placement procedure patient status will be followed by the interventional radiology doctors. Per standard of care after IVC filter placement, patient will be monitored in the hospital for up to 1 hour after the procedure. If patient is in stable condition and sedation has resolved, they will return home the same day or returned to their hospital rooms. A tentative appointment for follow up and filter retrieval will be ordered by IR physician at time of filter placement in APEX. This will ensure that scheduling and study staff will be aware that further patient and primary care follow-up is required. Patient primary care physician and/or relevant medical staff will be telephoned one month after IVC filter placement to determine if patient is medically stable and suitable for IVC filter removal. If IR and other doctors agree that IVC filter removal is recommended, patient will be scheduled to return for follow-up imaging and filter retrieval. If patient is not medically stable or still at high risk for blood clots, we will attempt to schedule a follow up one month later. Close contact with primary physician and patient will be maintained to ensure that filter is removed as soon as possible. APEX scheduling will be used to make sure follow up is performed at regular intervals. At follow-up appointment these routine tests per standard of care before IVC filter removal will be performed: * A physical exam * The study doctor will ask about medical history, how well patient is able to do daily activities, and if they are experiencing any possible symptoms related to the IVC filter placement such as abdominal or back pain. * A rotation CT focused to the site of the filter will be performed as part of routine practice of filter removal. This is done to ensure the filter has not migrated or that the filter has not penetrated through the walls of the IVC such that filter retrieval would be unsafe. * IR physician will determine if patient status is stable and safe for IVC filter removal. If not, physician will discuss with primary care doctor if filter needs to remain permanently in patient or if later retrieval should be considered at subsequent follow up visits. * IVC filter retrieval will be performed under moderate sedation. This procedure is very similar in nature to the filter placement procedure. The IVC filter is removed via a similar process to the way in which it was placed. X-ray dye (contrast) will be injected around the filter to assure that the filter and the area beneath the filter are free of blood clots and that it is safe to proceed with removal. A catheter-based snare will be used to engage the hook at the end of the filter and the filter will then be enveloped by a removal sheath and removed from the body.

Interventions

DEVICEFilter Placed

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

analysis of the imaging data will be masked and filter type and PHI will be redacted so the radiologist assessor will not know which patients receive either the option or denali..

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients scheduled for IVC filter placement at UCSF Moffitt, Mission Bay and Mount Zion hospitals Interventional Radiology 2. 18+

Exclusion criteria

1. Necessity of permanent IVC filter. 2. Genetic or physical abnormalities of the inferior vena cava 3. Circumstances that in the opinion of the primary investigator, patient would be a poor candidate either due to complications in medical condition or lack of ability for follow up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IVC: Filter Penetrationin dwelling time in 1 day after filter insertion up to 3 years.Using imaging analysis, patients will resume their standard care as normal but be encouraged to come back in 30 days for imaging followup and removal. other than that we will look at all available CT and xray imaging that clearly shows the filter and IVC vessel walls. We will count how many participants have penetration of the IVC greater than 3mm and the number of days since placement at imaging timepoints. The number of struts or hooks per filter with penetration will also be recorded.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With IVC Filter Migration30 daysThe number of participants with IVC filter migration in terms of distance migrated from initial placement location 30 days after filter placement will be assessed radiographically.
IVC Filter Tilt0-365 days post placement until project closure or patient endpoint reachednumber of participants with tilt of greater than 15 degrees in any CT imaging studies after filter placement and before removal of filter or study endpoint reached.
IVC Filter Fracture30 daysFracture of the component legs and struts of the IVC filter will be determined radiographically 30 days after placement.
Computerized Tomography (CT) Studies With IVC Penetration0-1733 daysAll CT studies with IVC penetration ≥ 3 mm, (%)
IVC Filter Improved Patient Follow Up and Prompt Filter RemovalNumber of participants who had filters removed after 30 days up to 1 yearThe research also aims to improve the standard of care for IVC filter patient follow up as the FDA and Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) recommend that IVC filters be removed as soon as it is safe to do so. Ideally filters will be imaged and removed after 30 days but in some cases patients will need filters to remain in place longer. We will make every effort to encourage patients and their medical team to return for follow up imaging and filter removal as soon as is deemed medically safe.
IVC Filter Improved Patient Follow Up and Prompt Filter Removal: Number of DaysNumber of participants who had filters removed after 30 days up to 1 yearThe research also aims to improve the standard of care for IVC filter patient follow up as the FDA and Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) recommend that IVC filters be removed as soon as it is safe to do so. Ideally filters will be imaged and removed after 30 days but in some cases patients will need filters to remain in place longer. We will make every effort to encourage patients and their medical team to return for follow up imaging and filter removal as soon as is deemed medically safe.
IVC Filter Clot30 daysThrombus (or clot) formed in the IVC filter 30 days after placement will be assessed radiographically.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

From April 2014-May 2016, patients coming to University of California, San Francisco Interventional Radiology (IR) with a MD referral for an Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) filter were invited to join a study of two FDA approved filters. After informed consent, subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either a Denali or Option Elite filter.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Denali
Denali brand IVC Filter will be placed in patients randomized to Denali Arm.
24
Denali
Denali brand IVC Filter will be placed in patients randomized to Denali Arm.
25
Option
Option Elite IVC Filter brand IVC Filter will be placed in patients randomized to Option Arm.
21
Option
Option Elite IVC Filter brand IVC Filter will be placed in patients randomized to Option Arm.
20
Total90

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath34
Overall StudyFailed retrieval10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalOptionDenali
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
21 Participants9 Participants12 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
24 Participants12 Participants12 Participants
Filter Indwelling Time331.3 days since filter placement277.1 days since filter placement378.7 days since filter placement
Indication for filter placement
Complication from Anti coagulation
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Indication for filter placement
Failure to maintain anti coagulation
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Indication for filter placement
Prophylactic (no current thromboembolic disease)
16 Participants8 Participants8 Participants
Indication for filter placement
Recurrent Pulmonary Embolism Despite Therapy
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Indication for filter placement
VTE and contraindication to anticoagulation
24 Participants11 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
7 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
33 Participants16 Participants17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
45 participants21 participants24 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants10 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants11 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 243 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 240 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 240 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

IVC: Filter Penetration

Using imaging analysis, patients will resume their standard care as normal but be encouraged to come back in 30 days for imaging followup and removal. other than that we will look at all available CT and xray imaging that clearly shows the filter and IVC vessel walls. We will count how many participants have penetration of the IVC greater than 3mm and the number of days since placement at imaging timepoints. The number of struts or hooks per filter with penetration will also be recorded.

Time frame: in dwelling time in 1 day after filter insertion up to 3 years.

Population: patients consented to the trial and needing a temporary ivc filter

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DenaliIVC: Filter Penetration24 Participants
OptionIVC: Filter Penetration20 Participants
Comparison: A Fisher's exact test was used to determine if there was a difference in the numbers of filters with penetration for each type. The numbers were not powered enough to make extensive tests in this area meaningful.p-value: 1t-test, 2 sided
p-value: 1t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Computerized Tomography (CT) Studies With IVC Penetration

All CT studies with IVC penetration ≥ 3 mm, (%)

Time frame: 0-1733 days

Population: Imaging was analyzed to see if filter penetration could be observed and there was some penetration on imaging but nothing beyond 3mm.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DenaliComputerized Tomography (CT) Studies With IVC Penetration0 Penetrating filter struts
OptionComputerized Tomography (CT) Studies With IVC Penetration0 Penetrating filter struts
Secondary

IVC Filter Clot

Thrombus (or clot) formed in the IVC filter 30 days after placement will be assessed radiographically.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: the population sample size was not large enough to see differences between groups.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DenaliIVC Filter Clot2 Participants
OptionIVC Filter Clot2 Participants
Secondary

IVC Filter Fracture

Fracture of the component legs and struts of the IVC filter will be determined radiographically 30 days after placement.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DenaliIVC Filter Fracture0 Participants
OptionIVC Filter Fracture0 Participants
Secondary

IVC Filter Improved Patient Follow Up and Prompt Filter Removal

The research also aims to improve the standard of care for IVC filter patient follow up as the FDA and Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) recommend that IVC filters be removed as soon as it is safe to do so. Ideally filters will be imaged and removed after 30 days but in some cases patients will need filters to remain in place longer. We will make every effort to encourage patients and their medical team to return for follow up imaging and filter removal as soon as is deemed medically safe.

Time frame: Number of participants who had filters removed after 30 days up to 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DenaliIVC Filter Improved Patient Follow Up and Prompt Filter Removal17 Filter
OptionIVC Filter Improved Patient Follow Up and Prompt Filter Removal16 Filter
Secondary

IVC Filter Improved Patient Follow Up and Prompt Filter Removal: Number of Days

The research also aims to improve the standard of care for IVC filter patient follow up as the FDA and Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) recommend that IVC filters be removed as soon as it is safe to do so. Ideally filters will be imaged and removed after 30 days but in some cases patients will need filters to remain in place longer. We will make every effort to encourage patients and their medical team to return for follow up imaging and filter removal as soon as is deemed medically safe.

Time frame: Number of participants who had filters removed after 30 days up to 1 year

Population: Participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DenaliIVC Filter Improved Patient Follow Up and Prompt Filter Removal: Number of Days161.7 Days
OptionIVC Filter Improved Patient Follow Up and Prompt Filter Removal: Number of Days130.8 Days
Secondary

IVC Filter Tilt

number of participants with tilt of greater than 15 degrees in any CT imaging studies after filter placement and before removal of filter or study endpoint reached.

Time frame: 0-365 days post placement until project closure or patient endpoint reached

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DenaliIVC Filter Tilt0 participants
OptionIVC Filter Tilt0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With IVC Filter Migration

The number of participants with IVC filter migration in terms of distance migrated from initial placement location 30 days after filter placement will be assessed radiographically.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DenaliNumber of Participants With IVC Filter Migration0 Participants
OptionNumber of Participants With IVC Filter Migration0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026