Skip to content

Staged Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release: Which Side Hurts More?

Staged Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release: Which Side Hurts More?

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02198521
Enrollment
0
Registered
2014-07-23
Start date
2014-07-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2017-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Pain

Keywords

Patients undergoing staged bilateral open Carpal Tunnel Release (CTR) have no difference in overall pain intensity of pain between sides.

Brief summary

Title Staged Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release: Which Side Hurts More? Primary null hypothesis Patients undergoing staged bilateral open Carpal Tunnel Release (CTR) have no difference in overall pain intensity of pain between sides. Secondary null hypotheses * There is no correlation in overall pain intensity after open CTR surgery and distal sensory latency, distal motor latency, electromyography (EMG), demographics, occupation, avocation, relevant comorbidities, dominance, left vs. right, Pain Self-Efficacy, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity or PROMIS depression when both surgeries are performed within 6 months. * There is no difference in satisfaction with treatment at the time of suture removal after the first and second open CTR surgery when both are performed within 6 months.. IRB: 2009-p-001-019 ClinicalTrials.gov: Not mandatory, (b/o observational) Authors: Drijkoningen, Braun, Ring Journal: To be discussed Design: Prospective cohort study Background Many hand surgeons note that patients undergoing staged bilateral open carpal tunnel release often experience more pain with the second side. The investigator felt this was an easily testable hypothesis worthy of study. Subjects Eligibility: Inclusion: * Age 18 or older * Idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome * No prior surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome Exclude: * Pregnant women * Not fluent in English Response Variables: * 11-point ordinal measure of overall pain intensity during and after surgery measured at the time of suture removal. * 11-point ordinal measure of satisfaction with treatment * PROMIS upper extremity Explanatory Variables: * Distal Sensory Latency (DSL) * Distal Motor Latency (DML) * EMG changes * Demographics: age, sex, race, occupation, avocation * Time limit between two surgeries \< 6 months * Relevant comorbidities: Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthrosis, ulnar neuropathy, trigger finger * Involved hand (Dominance, Side) * First side vs. second side surgery * PROMIS Pain Interference Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) * Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2) * PROMIS Depression Methods The investigator and study staff will invite all adult patients (age 18 and older) presenting to the Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service Department at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome planning staged bilateral carpal tunnel release. Analysis Power analysis An a priori power analysis for matched pairs was performed. To detect the difference between two dependent means an effect size of 0.5 at alpha of 0.05 and 80% power, a total sample size of 34 patients is needed.As the investigator expects to have patients who will be lost to follow-up the investigators will count 10% extra, a total of 38 patients will be needed. Univariate analysis: Variables will be presented with frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and as mean with standard deviation or median with interquartile range for respectively normal or non-normal distributed continuous variables. Normality of continuous distributed variables will be tested a paired T-Test. Bivariate and multivariable analysis will be performed and subsequently all variables with a probability \< 0.10 in bivariate analysis will be inserted in a backward, stepwise, multivariable linear regression analysis to assess their ability to explain variation in outcome. The 11 point Likert Pain scale score is considered significant when there is a difference of more than 1.4 points (2.8 SD\*0.5 effect size)on a scale from 1-10.\[9\]

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 or older * Idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome * No prior surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women * Not fluent in English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Pain Intensity2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframeThe overall pain intensity is measured on an 11-point ordinal measure of overall pain intensity after surgery measured at the time of suture removal.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Reported Outcome for Upper Extremity Function2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframePROMIS upper extremity
Electromyogram ResultsBefore SurgeryEMG DSL and DML
Demographics2 weeks after first surgeryAge, sex, race, occupation, avocation
Comorbidities2 weeks after surgeryRelevant comorbidities: TMC Arthrosis, ulnar neuropathy, trigger finger
Overall Satisfaction2 weeks after surgery within a 6 month timeframe11-point ordinal measure of satisfaction with treatment measured 2 weeks after surgery during suture removal
Patient Reported Pain Interference2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframePROMIS Pain Interference (CAT)
Patient Self Efficacy Questionnaire2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframePSEQ-2
Patient Reported Depression2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframePROMIS Depression
Hand Dominance and Side of Surgery2 weeks after surgery

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026