Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage
Conditions
Keywords
Peptic ulcer hemorrhage, second-look endoscopy
Brief summary
The purpose of this prospective study is to identify risk factors which could predict poor fading of SRH or early recurrent bleeding of peptic ulcer hemorrhage after successful endoscopic hemostasis and high-dose PPI infusion. These risk factors will be the selection criteria for patients who are indicated to receive second-look endoscopy.
Detailed description
Peptic ulcer bleeding is a common disease, and recurrent bleeding is an independent risk factor leading to mortality. The appearance of stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) indicates possible recurrence of peptic ulcer bleeding, for which the likelihood decreases over the course of 3-6 days. In addition to endoscopic evidences illustrating the SRH, patients with co-morbidities have a higher risk of recurrent bleeding. Patients with co-morbidities have not only higher recurrent bleeding rates during the first 3 days but also higher delay recurrent bleeding after 3-day proton pump inhibitor (PPI) infusion than those without. More than 50% recurrent bleeding develops after 3-day PPI infusion among patients with end stage renal diseases. Although endoscopic treatment plus a 72-hour intravenous PPI infusion and followed by oral PPI has already been adopted as a standard treatment in peptic ulcer bleeding currently, several studies showed limited effectiveness of such treatment for high risk patients. The reasons may be because lesions of SRH were not completely faded after initial treatment including endoscopic hemostasis and intravenous PPI infusion. Thus, it is an important issue to improve such high recurrent bleeding risk for these patients. Endoscopic treatment plus a 72-hour intravenous PPI infusion is the standard protocol for treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding. Moreover, several studies have shown that PPI treatment could decrease the presentation of SRH. However, there were insufficient data to validate the efficacy of such standard treatment to fade the SRH, especially among high risk patients. Therefore, several studies looked at the efficacy of routine second-look endoscopy, defined as scheduled repeat endoscopy after primary endoscopic hemostasis in patients at high risk of rebleeding. However, the role and the selection criteria for patients who require second-look endoscopy remains uncertain. There is a pressing need to elucidate the role of second-look endoscopy in these patients. Hence, the purpose of this prospective study is to identify risk factors which could predict poor fading of SRH or early recurrent bleeding of peptic ulcer hemorrhage after successful endoscopic hemostasis and high-dose PPI infusion. This data will show the originality and clinical importance to identify the selection criteria for patients who are indicated to receive second-look endoscopy.
Interventions
DRUGesomeprazole or pantoprazole
Each enrolled patient receives an 80 mg loading dose of intravenous esomeprazole (Nexium®, AstraZeneca AB, Södertälje, Sweden) immediately after hemostasis is achieved spontaneously or by gastroscopy. Patients then receive a 3-day continuous high dose (8 mg per hour) of esomeprazole infusion. Because of concern for patient safety with certain drug-drug interactions, patients who take clopidogrel receive intravenous pantoprazole (Pantoloc®, Takeda, Singen, Germany), including an 80 mg loading dose and a 3-day continuous high-dose (8 mg/h) of infusion.
PROCEDUREEndoscopic hemostasis
At the index gastroscopy, bleeding ulcers are checked. If the adherent clot is found over the ulcer base, it will be vigorously washed away with water jet. All of the stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) are treated by one or a combination of endoscopic therapies including local injection of diluted epinephrine 1:10000, bipolar heated probe at 20 J per goal consecutively until achievement of coaptive coagulation, argon plasma coagulation, band ligation, or hemoclip therapy. The success of endoscopic hemostasis is defined as cessation of bleeding together with achievement of cavitation at the vessel after application of the heater probe.
Sponsors
National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
Study design
Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Bleeding peptic ulcers with major stigmata of recent hemorrhage * All of these major SRH are treated by local injection of diluted epinephrine 1:10000 with or without combined therapy with a heater probe, argon plasma coagulation, band ligation, or hemoclip therapy
Exclusion criteria
* Bleeding due to tumor or cancer * Bleeding due to the presence of a Dieulafoy lesion * Ulcer bleeding due to mechanical factors (i.e., gastrostomy tube induction) * Proton pump inhibitors use within one week before enrollment * Failure to establish hemostasis under gastroscopy * Hypersensitivity to esomeprazole, pantoprazole, or any component of the formulation * Previously participated in the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| the fading rate of major stigmata of recent hemorrhage | within 3 days after the index gastroscopy | At the index gastroscopy, bleeding ulcers are checked. All of the major stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) are treated by one or a combination of endoscopic therapies. The success of endoscopic hemostasis is defined as cessation of bleeding together with achievement of cavitation at the vessel after application of the heater probe. Second-look endoscopy is scheduled 48-72 hours after successful index endoscopic hemostasis and intravenous high-dose proton pump inhibitor infusion. For each patient with either suspected or active recurrent bleeding, emergent endoscopy is conducted earlier before the schedule to confirm peptic ulcer recurrent bleeding. Possible risk factors including patient's baseline clinical, laboratory characteristics, and gastroscopic pictures are obtained at the time of admission. Multiple logistic regression analysis is applied to assess the independent risk factors related to residual major stigmata or early recurrent bleeding of peptic ulcers. |
Countries
Taiwan
Outcome results
None listed