Skip to content

Effectiveness and Safety of Synvisc® Versus Usual Treatments in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

A Multicentre, Open-label and Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare in Patient With Knee Osteoarthritis the Medicoeconomic Benefits as Well as Effectiveness and Safety of Synvisc® Versus Usual Treatments.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02197026
Enrollment
518
Registered
2014-07-22
Start date
1998-10-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

Comparison of treatment cost of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in patients treated with Synvisc® versus usual treatments as well as evaluation of safety and effectiveness of these treatments.

Interventions

DRUGStandard treatment

Standard drug treatment at the discretion of the investigator

PROCEDUREPhysiotherapy
PROCEDUREHydrotherapy

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female outpatient aged at least 18 years * Patient suffering from predominant femoro-tibial knee osteoarthrosis with or without effusion. The diagnosis must be based on American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. Radiological grade will be assess according to Kellgren-Lawrence scale * Assessment of pain on active movement (i.e. walking) (by the patient) must be at least 40 mm on a 100 mm VAS * Patient who received at least two courses of at least ten days within the last three months with non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) and/or who are treated continuously for the last two month with slow-acting anti-osteoarthritis drugs * Patient's informed written consent obtained in accordance with French legislation

Exclusion criteria

* Patient suffering from acute congestive osteoarthritis flare of the target knee (at the time of inclusion) which means that concomitantly to knee effusion at least 2 of the following criteria are present: * nocturnal disturbances due to knee pain * morning stiffness over 45 minutes * increase of knee pain more than 50% within the last week * articular reddening * articular heat * Intra-articular administration of hyaluronic acid in the target knee within the previous year * Intra-articular administration of hyaluronic acid in the target knee within the three previous months * Any other intra-articular injection in the target knee within the last 6 months * Any contraindication to intra-articular injections * Present or past history of infected target knee joint * Previous prosthesis knee surgery, tibial osteotomy, synovectomy or synoviorthese of the target knee * Arthroscopy, articular lavage, debridement, menisectomy of the target knee within the previous year * Planned knee surgery within the nine following month * Any other musculoskeletal disorders that can interfere with osteoarthritis diagnosis or the evaluation of its severity * Known hypersensitivity to avian products * Presence of lymphatic or venous stasis * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * Clinical evidence of or known severe cardiac, hepatic, renal, metabolic, haematological disease, mental disturbance * Participation in another clinical trial during this study or during the previous month * Previous participation in this trial * Patient who requires help concerning shopping or house keeping * Patient unable to comply with the protocol (e.g. patient unable to attend each trial visit or to fill the diary booklet or the quality of life questionnaire)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost of knee OA treatment including cost of side effect related to OA treatmentup to 274 days
Area under the curve (AUC) Lequesne indexDay 1, 29, 91, 182 and 274Index of severity

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Disease activity assessment by patient and investigator on a VASDay 1, 29, 91, 182 and 274
Acute congestive OA flares assessed through a questionnaireDay 1, 29, 91, 182 and 274
Assessment of state of health of the patients with a quality of life questionnaire (SF 12)Day 1, 91, 182, 274
Assessment of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) index by patientDay 1, 91, 182 and 274
Final global assessment of tolerability by patient and investigator on a four-point VRSDay 274
Incidence and intensity of adverse eventsup to day 274
Number of withdrawals due to adverse eventup to day 274
Final global assessment of efficacy by patient and investigator on a four-point verbal rating scale (VRS)Day 274
Patient's assessment of pain on movement and rest on a visual analogue scale (VAS) through WOMAC question 1 and 3Day 1, 91, 182 and 274

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026