Skip to content

BOTOX® in the Treatment of Crow's Feet Lines in China

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02195687
Enrollment
417
Registered
2014-07-21
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2015-06-30
Last updated
2016-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crow's Feet Lines, Lateral Canthal Lines

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of BOTOX® (botulinum toxin Type A) compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe crow's feet lines (lateral canthal lines).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALbotulinum toxin Type A

botulinum toxin Type A (BOTOX®) injected into bilateral crow's feet line areas.

DRUGNormal Saline

Normal Saline (placebo) injected into bilateral Crow's Feet Line areas.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-Moderate to severe Crow's Feet Lines.

Exclusion criteria

* Current or previous treatment with botulinum toxin of any serotype for any condition within the last year * Diagnosis of myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis * Facial laser or light treatment, microdermabrasion or chemical peels within 3 months * Radio frequency laser treatments, phototherapy, blepharoplasty, brow-lift or related procedure, permanent make-up, oral retinoid therapy or treatment with non-permanent soft tissue fillers within 1 year * Any medium-depth or deep facial peels within 5 years * Periorbital surgery, face-lift, mid facial or periorbital treatment with permanent soft tissue fillers, synthetic implants or autologous fat transplant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects Achieving None or Mild on the Investigator's Assessment of the Severity of Crow's Feet Lines (CFL) at Maximum Smile Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale-Asian (FWS-A)Day 30The Investigator assessed the severity of the subject's CFLs at maximum smile using the 4-point FWS-A where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe. The percentage of subjects with a score of none or mild at Day 30 is reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 1-grade Improvement on the Investigator's Assessment of CFL Severity at Rest Using the 4-point FWS-ADay 30The Investigator assessed the severity of the subject's CFLs at rest using the 4-point Facial Wrinkle Scale where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe among subjects rated as at least mild at baseline by the Investigator. The percentages of subjects with at least a 1-grade improvement are noted.
Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 1-grade Improvement on the Investigator's Assessment of CFL Severity at Maximum Smile on the 4-point FWS-ADay 30The Investigator assessed the severity of the subject's CFLs at maximum smile using the 4-point Facial Wrinkle Scale where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe. The percentages of subjects with at least a 1-grade improvement are noted.
Percentage of Subjects Reporting Their Global Change in Appearance as Very Much Improved or Much Improved Using the 7-point Subject's Global Assessment of Change in CFL (SGA-CFL)Day 30Subjects assessed their global change in appearance using the 7-point SGA-CFL scale where 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse. The percentage of subjects reporting very much improved or much improved are noted.
Percentage of Subjects Assessing Their Age-related Facial Appearance as Looking Younger on the Self-Perception of Age (SPA) QuestionnaireBaseline, Day 30Subjects assessed their age-related appearance according to the following on the SPA questionnaire: look my current age, look younger, and look older when compared to their baseline assessment. The percentages of subjects who reported looking younger amongst subjects who rated themselves as looking their current age or older at baseline are noted.
Percentage of Subjects Achieving None or Mild on the Subject's Assessment of the Severity of Crow's Feet Lines (CFL) at Maximum Smile Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale-Asian (FWS-A)Day 30The subject assessed the severity of their CFLs at maximum smile using the 4-point FWS-A where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe. The percentage of subjects with a score of none or mild at Day 30 is reported.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The participant flow reflects the Safety Population, which includes all randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug injection.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Botulinum Toxin Type A
24U botulinum toxin Type A (BOTOX®) total dose injected into bilateral Crow's Feet Line areas on Day 1.
316
Placebo
Placebo (Normal Saline) injected into bilateral Crow's Feet Line areas on Day 1.
101
Total417

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up41
Overall StudyPersonal Reasons11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBotulinum Toxin Type APlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous46.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.64
46.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.39
46.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.57
Sex: Female, Male
Female
273 Participants87 Participants360 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
43 Participants14 Participants57 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 3160 / 101
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3160 / 101

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Subjects Achieving None or Mild on the Investigator's Assessment of the Severity of Crow's Feet Lines (CFL) at Maximum Smile Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale-Asian (FWS-A)

The Investigator assessed the severity of the subject's CFLs at maximum smile using the 4-point FWS-A where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe. The percentage of subjects with a score of none or mild at Day 30 is reported.

Time frame: Day 30

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat: all randomized subjects who received at least 1 injection of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Botulinum Toxin Type APercentage of Subjects Achieving None or Mild on the Investigator's Assessment of the Severity of Crow's Feet Lines (CFL) at Maximum Smile Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale-Asian (FWS-A)63.9 Percentage of Subjects
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Achieving None or Mild on the Investigator's Assessment of the Severity of Crow's Feet Lines (CFL) at Maximum Smile Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale-Asian (FWS-A)5.0 Percentage of Subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Achieving None or Mild on the Subject's Assessment of the Severity of Crow's Feet Lines (CFL) at Maximum Smile Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale-Asian (FWS-A)

The subject assessed the severity of their CFLs at maximum smile using the 4-point FWS-A where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe. The percentage of subjects with a score of none or mild at Day 30 is reported.

Time frame: Day 30

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat: all randomized subjects who received at least 1 injection of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Botulinum Toxin Type APercentage of Subjects Achieving None or Mild on the Subject's Assessment of the Severity of Crow's Feet Lines (CFL) at Maximum Smile Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale-Asian (FWS-A)60.8 Percentage of Subjects
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Achieving None or Mild on the Subject's Assessment of the Severity of Crow's Feet Lines (CFL) at Maximum Smile Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale-Asian (FWS-A)5.9 Percentage of Subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Assessing Their Age-related Facial Appearance as Looking Younger on the Self-Perception of Age (SPA) Questionnaire

Subjects assessed their age-related appearance according to the following on the SPA questionnaire: look my current age, look younger, and look older when compared to their baseline assessment. The percentages of subjects who reported looking younger amongst subjects who rated themselves as looking their current age or older at baseline are noted.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 30

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat: all randomized subjects who received at least 1 injection of study drug and rated themselves as looking their current age or older at baseline

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Botulinum Toxin Type APercentage of Subjects Assessing Their Age-related Facial Appearance as Looking Younger on the Self-Perception of Age (SPA) Questionnaire53.9 Percentage of Subjects
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Assessing Their Age-related Facial Appearance as Looking Younger on the Self-Perception of Age (SPA) Questionnaire14.7 Percentage of Subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Reporting Their Global Change in Appearance as Very Much Improved or Much Improved Using the 7-point Subject's Global Assessment of Change in CFL (SGA-CFL)

Subjects assessed their global change in appearance using the 7-point SGA-CFL scale where 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse. The percentage of subjects reporting very much improved or much improved are noted.

Time frame: Day 30

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat: all randomized subjects who received at least 1 injection of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Botulinum Toxin Type APercentage of Subjects Reporting Their Global Change in Appearance as Very Much Improved or Much Improved Using the 7-point Subject's Global Assessment of Change in CFL (SGA-CFL)54.4 Percentage of Subjects
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Reporting Their Global Change in Appearance as Very Much Improved or Much Improved Using the 7-point Subject's Global Assessment of Change in CFL (SGA-CFL)3.0 Percentage of Subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 1-grade Improvement on the Investigator's Assessment of CFL Severity at Maximum Smile on the 4-point FWS-A

The Investigator assessed the severity of the subject's CFLs at maximum smile using the 4-point Facial Wrinkle Scale where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe. The percentages of subjects with at least a 1-grade improvement are noted.

Time frame: Day 30

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat: all randomized subjects who received at least 1 injection of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Botulinum Toxin Type APercentage of Subjects With a ≥ 1-grade Improvement on the Investigator's Assessment of CFL Severity at Maximum Smile on the 4-point FWS-A85.1 Percentage of Subjects
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With a ≥ 1-grade Improvement on the Investigator's Assessment of CFL Severity at Maximum Smile on the 4-point FWS-A12.9 Percentage of Subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 1-grade Improvement on the Investigator's Assessment of CFL Severity at Rest Using the 4-point FWS-A

The Investigator assessed the severity of the subject's CFLs at rest using the 4-point Facial Wrinkle Scale where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe among subjects rated as at least mild at baseline by the Investigator. The percentages of subjects with at least a 1-grade improvement are noted.

Time frame: Day 30

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat: all randomized subjects who received at least 1 injection of study drug

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Botulinum Toxin Type APercentage of Subjects With a ≥ 1-grade Improvement on the Investigator's Assessment of CFL Severity at Rest Using the 4-point FWS-A60.1 Percentage of Subjects
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With a ≥ 1-grade Improvement on the Investigator's Assessment of CFL Severity at Rest Using the 4-point FWS-A5.4 Percentage of Subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026