Skip to content

A Study of Combination of Daratumumab and Velcade (Bortezomib) Melphalan-Prednisone (DVMP) Compared to Velcade Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) in Participants With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Study of VELCADE (Bortezomib) Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) Compared to Daratumumab in Combination With VMP (D-VMP), in Subjects With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Who Are Ineligible for High-dose Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02195479
Enrollment
706
Registered
2014-07-21
Start date
2014-12-09
Completion date
2024-08-07
Last updated
2025-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

Multiple Myeloma, Bortezomib, Velcade, Melphalan, Prednisone, Daratumumab

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the addition of daratumumab to velcade (bortezomib) melphalan-prednisone (VMP) will prolong progression-free survival (PFS) compared with VMP alone in participants with previously untreated multiple myeloma who are ineligible for high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT).

Detailed description

The study consists of 3 phases: Screening Phase (within 21 days prior to randomization), Treatment Phase (Cycle 1 Day 1 to discontinuation of all study treatment), and Follow-up Phase (from discontinuation of all study treatment up to death, lost to follow up, withdrawal of consent, or the study ends, whichever occurs first). Treatment phase will include 2 treatments (Treatment A: participants will receive Velcade MelphalanPrednisone (VMP) alone and Treatment B: participants will receive daratumumab in combination with VMP).Two interim analyses are planned. The first will be to evaluate safety after a total of approximately 100 participants have been treated for at least 2 cycles or discontinued the study treatment. The second will be to evaluate cumulative interim safety and efficacy data, and will be performed when approximately 216 PFS events have been accumulated. The final OS analysis will occur when approximately 382 deaths have occurred. Efficacy will be primarily measured by comparison of PFS between the two treatment arms. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Interventions

DRUGVelcade

Participants will receive velcade 1.3 mg/m\^2, as subcutaneous injection, twice weekly at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 5 in Cycle 1 followed by once weekly at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 5 in Cycles 2 to 9.

DRUGMelphalan

Participants will receive melphalan 9 mg/m\^2, orally, once daily on Days 1 to 4 of each cycle up to Cycle 9.

DRUGPrednisone

Participants will receive prednisone 60 mg/m\^2, orally, once daily, on Days 1 to 4 of each cycle up to Cycle 9.

Participants will receive daratumumab 16 mg/kg as intravenous infusion, once weekly, for 6 weeks in Cycle 1 and then once every 3 weeks, in Cycle 2 to 9 and thereafter, once every 4 weeks until documented progression, unacceptable toxicity, or until the end of study .

DRUGDexamethasone

Participants administered with dexamethasone 20 mg IV or PO is given 1 hour or less prior to daratumumab administration as pre medication and prednisone substitute.

Daratumumab SC will be administered by SC injection at a fixed dose of 1800 mg once every 4 weeks until documented progression, unacceptable toxicity, or until the end of study. Following amendment 7, participants can switch from daratumumab IV to daratumumab SC.

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant must have documented multiple myeloma satisfying the calcium elevation, renal insufficiency, anemia, and bone abnormalities (CRAB) diagnostic criteria, monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow greater than or equal to 10 percent (%) or presence of a biopsy proven plasmacytoma, and measurable secretory disease, as assessed by the central laboratory, and defined in protocol * Participants who are newly diagnosed and not considered candidate for high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation (SCT) due to: being age \>=65 years, or in participants \<65 years: presence of important comorbid conditions likely to have a negative impact on tolerability of high dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation * Participant must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0, 1, or 2 * Meet the clinical laboratory criteria as specified in the protocol * A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening within 14 days prior to randomization * Women of childbearing potential must commit to either abstain continuously from heterosexual sexual intercourse or to use 2 methods of reliable birth control simultaneously. This includes one highly effective form of contraception (tubal ligation, intrauterine device, hormonal \[birth control pills, injections, hormonal patches, vaginal rings or implants\] or partner's vasectomy) and one additional effective contraceptive method (male latex or synthetic condom, diaphragm, or cervical cap). Contraception must begin prior to dosing. Reliable contraception is indicated even where there has been a history of infertility, unless due to hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy

Exclusion criteria

* Participant has a diagnosis of primary amyloidosis, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, or smoldering multiple myeloma * Participant has a diagnosis of Waldenstrom's disease, or other conditions in which IgM M-protein is present in the absence of a clonal plasma cell infiltration with lytic bone lesions * Participant has prior or current systemic therapy or SCT for multiple myeloma, with the exception of an emergency use of a short course (equivalent of dexamethasone 40 mg/day for 4 days) of corticosteroids before treatment * Participant has peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain Grade 2 or higher, as defined by the national cancer institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4 * Participant has a history of malignancy (other than multiple myeloma) within 3 years before the date of randomization (exceptions are squamous and basal cell carcinomas of the skin and carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or malignancy that in the opinion of the investigator, with concurrence with the sponsor's medical monitor, is considered cured with minimal risk of recurrence within 3 years) * Participant has had radiation therapy within 14 days of randomization * Participant has had plasmapheresis within 28 days of randomization * Participant has known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (defined as a forced expiratory volume in 1 second \[FEV1\] \<50% of predicted normal), known moderate or severe persistent asthma within the last 2 years or currently has uncontrolled asthma of any classification (controlled intermittent asthma or controlled mild persistent asthma is allowed) * Participants with known or suspected COPD must have a FEV1 test during screening * Participant is known to be seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), known to have hepatitis B surface antigen positivity, or history of to have a history of hepatitis C * Participant has any concurrent medical or psychiatric condition or disease (example active systemic infection, uncontrolled diabetes, acute diffuse infiltrative pulmonary disease) that is likely to interfere with the study procedures or results, or that in the opinion of the investigator, would constitute a hazard for participating in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS)From randomization (Day -3) up to 2.4 yearsPFS: duration from date of randomization to progressive disease (PD)/death, whichever occurs first. PD per IMWG criteria-Increase of 25% from lowest response value in one of following: Serum M-component (absolute increase \>=0.5 grams per deciliter \[g/dL\]); Urine M-component (absolute increase \>=200 milligrams \[mg\]/24 hours); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase \>10 mg/dL); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, without measurable disease by FLC levels, bone marrow Plasma cells (PC) percentage (%) (absolute % \>=10%); Bone marrow PC%: absolute% \>10%; Definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas/definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas and Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to the PC proliferative disorder.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or BetterFrom randomization (Day -3) up to 2.4 yearsVGPR or better rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved VGPR or complete response (CR) (including stringent complete response\[sCR\]) according to the IMWG criteria during or after the study treatment. VGPR: Serum and urine component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, or \>= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level less than (\<) 100 milligram (mg) per 24 hour; CR: negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5% plasms cells (PCs) in bone marrow; sCR: CR in addition to having a normal FLC ratio and an absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, 2-4 color flow cytometry.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or BetterFrom randomization (Day -3) up to 2.4 yearsCR or better rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a CR or better (i.e. CR and sCR) as per IMWG criteria. CR: as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and less than (\<) 5 percent plasma cells in bone marrow; sCR: CR plus normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry.
Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)From randomization (Day -3) up to 2.4 yearssCR as per IMWG criteria is CR plus normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry. CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine; Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas; \<5% plasma cells (PCs) in bone marrow.
Percentage of Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)From randomization (Day -3) up to 8.3 yearsThe Minimal Residual Disease negativity rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had negative MRD (detection of less than 1 malignant cell among 100,000 normal cells) assessment at any timepoint after the first dose of study drugs by evaluation of bone marrow aspirates or whole blood at 10\^-5 threshold. MRD was evaluated by using Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing of immunoglobulin genes. MRD was assessed in participants who achieved complete response or stringent complete response (CR/sCR).
Overall Survival (OS)From randomization (Day -3) up to 8.3 yearsOverall Survival (OS) was measured from the date of randomization to date of death. Median Overall Survival was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Progression Free Survival on Next Line of Therapy (PFS2)From randomization (Day -3) up to 8.3 yearsProgression-free survival after next-line therapy is defined as the time from randomization to progression on the next line of subsequent antimyeloma therapy or death due to any cause (prior to start of second line of antimyeloma therapy), whichever comes first. Disease progression on next line of treatment was based on investigator judgment.
Time to Disease Progression (TTP)From randomization (Day -3) up to 2.4 yearsTTP: Time from date of randomization to date of first documented evidence of PD or death due to PD, whichever occurs first. PD per IMWG criteria- Increase of 25 % from lowest response value in one of following: Serum M-component (absolute increase \>=0.5 g/dL); Urine M-component (absolute increase \>=200 mg/24 hours); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase \>10 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels and without measurable disease by FLC levels, bone marrow plasma cells (PC)% (absolute % \>=10%); Bone marrow PC %: absolute % \>10%; Definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas and Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to the PC proliferative disorder.
Overall Response Rate (ORR)From randomization (Day -3) up to 2.4 yearsThe Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a partial response (PR) or better, according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, during the study or during follow up. IMWG criteria for PR: greater than or equal to (\>=) 50 percentage (%) reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urinary M-protein by \>=90% or to \<200 mg/24 hours, if the serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of \>=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria, If serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, and serum free light assay is also not measurable, \>=50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells (PCs) is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell percentage was \>=30%, in addition to the above criteria, if present at baseline, a \>=50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required.
Duration of Response (DOR)From first documentation of response up to 2.4 yearsDOR: participants with confirmed response (PR or better) as time between first documentation of response and disease progression per IMWG response criteria, or death due to PD, whichever occurs first. PD: Increase of 25% from lowest response value in any one of following: Serum M-component (absolute increase\>=0.5 g/dL); Urine M-component (absolute increase\>=200 mg/24 hours); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase \>10mg/dL); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels and without measurable disease by FLC levels, bone marrow PC%(absolute%\>=10%); Bone marrow PC's %: absolute%\>10%; Definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas/definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas and Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to PC proliferative disorder.
Time to Next Treatment (TNT)From randomization (Day -3) up to 8.3 yearsTime to next treatment is defined as the time from randomization to the start of the next-line treatment. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis.
Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein ResponseUp to 2.4 yearsPercentage of participants with Best M- protein response of 100% reduction and \>=90% to \< 100% reduction were assessed. Best M-protein response was defined as the maximal percent reduction or the lowest percent increase from baseline in serum M-protein for participants with measurable heavy chain at baseline or urine M-protein for participants without measurable heavy chain, but with measurable light chain disease at baseline. For participants without measurable heavy chain and light chain disease at baseline, best response in serum free light chain (FLC) was defined as the maximal percent reduction or the lowest percent increase from baseline in the difference between involved and uninvolved serum FLC level (dFLC).
Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreBaseline (Day -24), Months 3, 6, 9, 12 ,18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30 items self-reporting questionnaire, with a 1 week recall period, resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 Global Health Status (GHS) scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The questionnaire includes 28 items with 4-point Likert type responses from 1-not at all to 4-very much to assess functioning and symptoms; 2 items with 7-point Likert scales (1= poor and 7= excellent) for global health and overall QoL. Scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores representing better GHS, better functioning, and more symptoms. Negative change from baseline values for function and GHS scale indicated deterioration in quality of life or functioning and positive values indicate improvement.
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleBaseline (Day -24), Months 3, 6, 9, 12 ,18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30 items self-reporting questionnaire, with a 1 week recall period, resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 Global Health Status (GHS) scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The questionnaire includes 28 items with 4-point Likert type responses from 1-not at all to 4-very much to assess functioning and symptoms; 2 items with 7-point Likert scales (1= poor and 7= excellent) for global health and overall QoL. Scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores representing better GHS, better functioning, and more symptoms. Negative change from baseline values for function and GHS scale indicated deterioration in quality of life or functioning and positive values indicate improvement.
Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline (Day- 24), Months 3, 6, 9, 12 ,18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state profile (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The Visual Analogue Scale is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreBaseline (Day -24), Months 3, 6, 9, 12 ,18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state profile (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems) that reflect increasing levels of difficulty. The participant was asked to indicate his/her current health state by selecting the most appropriate level in each of the 5 dimensions. Responses to the 5 dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score 0 (0.0- worst health state) to 1 (1.0- better health state) representing the general health status of the individual based on the UK scoring algorithm.
Time to ResponseFrom randomization (Day -3) up to 2.4 yearsTime to response, defined as the time between the date of randomization and the first efficacy evaluation that the participant has met all criteria for PR or better. PR: \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by \>=90% or to \<200 mg/24 hours; If the serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of \>=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria; If serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, and serum free light assay is also not measurable, \>=50% reduction in bone marrow PCs is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell percentage was \>=30%. In addition to the above criteria, if present at baseline, a \>=50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Japan, North Macedonia, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, South Korea, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)
Participants received Velcade (bortezomib) 1.3 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) as subcutaneous (SC) injection, twice weekly at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 5 in Cycle 1 followed by once weekly at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 5 in Cycles 2 to 9, melphalan 9 mg/m\^2 orally once daily on Days 1 to 4 and prednisone 60 mg/m\^2 orally once daily on Days 1 to 4 of each cycle up to Cycle 9. Each treatment cycle was of 6 weeks. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group \[IMWG\] criteria). After implementation of Amendment 7, post interim overall survival (OS) analysis, sponsor confirmation of disease progression was no longer required prior to initiation of subsequent anti-myeloma therapy, except for participants who progressed on VMP arm and requested subsequent therapy with daratumumab.
356
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)
Participants received Velcade 1.3 mg/m\^2 as SC injection, twice weekly at Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 5 in Cycle 1 followed by once weekly at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 5 in Cycles 2 to 9, melphalan 9 mg/m\^2, orally once daily on Days 1 to 4 and prednisone 60 mg/m\^2, orally once daily on Days 2 to 4 of each cycle up to Cycle 9. In addition, participants also received daratumumab 16 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) as intravenous (IV) infusion once weekly for 6 weeks in Cycle 1 and then once every 3 weeks in Cycle 2 to 9 and thereafter, once every 4 weeks (post-VMP treatment phase) until documented progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end. On Day 1 of each cycle, dexamethasone 20 mg IV or per oral (PO) was given 1 hour or less prior to daratumumab infusion as pre-medication and prednisone substitute. Each treatment cycle was of 6 weeks. After implementation of Amendment 7, participants who were ongoing with daratumumab IV treatment were given an option to switch to daratumumab SC injection on Day 1 of any cycle, as per investigator's discretion. After completion of treatment, participants entered follow-up phase and were not started on subsequent anti-myeloma therapy without confirmed disease progression (assessed by IMWG criteria).
350
Total706

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath217171
Overall StudyDiscontinued at clinical cutoff (due to end of data collection period)87130
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1815
Overall StudyOther34
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3030

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVelcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Total
Age, Continuous71.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.82
71.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.66
71.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.25
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants24 Participants40 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
332 Participants320 Participants652 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
45 Participants47 Participants92 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
304 Participants297 Participants601 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
10 Participants5 Participants15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
15 Participants8 Participants23 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Croatia
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
29 Participants21 Participants50 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Georgia
11 Participants11 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
15 Participants14 Participants29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
12 Participants14 Participants26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
26 Participants28 Participants54 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
26 Participants24 Participants50 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
18 Participants23 Participants41 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Macedonia
10 Participants1 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
27 Participants39 Participants66 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
18 Participants10 Participants28 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
21 Participants22 Participants43 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Serbia
3 Participants7 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
47 Participants56 Participants103 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
10 Participants5 Participants15 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
20 Participants28 Participants48 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
15 Participants9 Participants24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
189 Participants190 Participants379 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
167 Participants160 Participants327 Participants
Stage of Disease (ISS)
Stage I
67 Participants69 Participants136 Participants
Stage of Disease (ISS)
Stage II
160 Participants139 Participants299 Participants
Stage of Disease (ISS)
Stage III
129 Participants142 Participants271 Participants
Time from multiple myeloma (MM) diagnosis1.27 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.737
1.09 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.056
1.18 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.442

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
217 / 356172 / 350
other
Total, other adverse events
331 / 354329 / 346
serious
Total, serious adverse events
117 / 354186 / 346

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS: duration from date of randomization to progressive disease (PD)/death, whichever occurs first. PD per IMWG criteria-Increase of 25% from lowest response value in one of following: Serum M-component (absolute increase \>=0.5 grams per deciliter \[g/dL\]); Urine M-component (absolute increase \>=200 milligrams \[mg\]/24 hours); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase \>10 mg/dL); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, without measurable disease by FLC levels, bone marrow Plasma cells (PC) percentage (%) (absolute % \>=10%); Bone marrow PC%: absolute% \>10%; Definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas/definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas and Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to the PC proliferative disorder.

Time frame: From randomization (Day -3) up to 2.4 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all participants randomized into the study; classified according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Progression Free Survival (PFS)18.14 Months
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Progression Free Survival (PFS)NA Months
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning Score

The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30 items self-reporting questionnaire, with a 1 week recall period, resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 Global Health Status (GHS) scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The questionnaire includes 28 items with 4-point Likert type responses from 1-not at all to 4-very much to assess functioning and symptoms; 2 items with 7-point Likert scales (1= poor and 7= excellent) for global health and overall QoL. Scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores representing better GHS, better functioning, and more symptoms. Negative change from baseline values for function and GHS scale indicated deterioration in quality of life or functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -24), Months 3, 6, 9, 12 ,18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48

Population: ITT population: participants randomized into the study; classified according to assigned treatment group, regardless actual treatment received. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants who were analyzed at each specified timepoint, for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 39.4 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 610.5 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 911.8 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 1211.2 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 1812.8 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 2411.8 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 3010.8 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 3610.8 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 426.5 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 486.2 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 3612.3 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 38.5 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 2410.7 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 610.8 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 4810.5 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 911.1 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 3012.4 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 1212.6 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 4212.8 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning ScoreMonth 1812.5 Units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health Scale

The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30 items self-reporting questionnaire, with a 1 week recall period, resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 Global Health Status (GHS) scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The questionnaire includes 28 items with 4-point Likert type responses from 1-not at all to 4-very much to assess functioning and symptoms; 2 items with 7-point Likert scales (1= poor and 7= excellent) for global health and overall QoL. Scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores representing better GHS, better functioning, and more symptoms. Negative change from baseline values for function and GHS scale indicated deterioration in quality of life or functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -24), Months 3, 6, 9, 12 ,18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48

Population: ITT population: participants randomized into the study; classified according to assigned treatment group, regardless actual treatment received. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants who were analyzed at each specified timepoint, for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 34 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 68.8 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 910.2 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 1210.7 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 1811.8 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 2411.5 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 3010.8 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 368.6 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 424.8 Units on a scale
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 488.9 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 3611.9 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 37.5 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 249.5 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 68.5 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 489.8 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 910.6 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 3011.8 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 1211.4 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 4210.4 Units on a scale
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Global Health ScaleMonth 1812.8 Units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state profile (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems) that reflect increasing levels of difficulty. The participant was asked to indicate his/her current health state by selecting the most appropriate level in each of the 5 dimensions. Responses to the 5 dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score 0 (0.0- worst health state) to 1 (1.0- better health state) representing the general health status of the individual based on the UK scoring algorithm.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -24), Months 3, 6, 9, 12 ,18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48

Population: ITT population: participants randomized into the study; classified according to assigned treatment group, regardless actual treatment received. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants who were analyzed at each specified timepoint, for each arm, respectively. n=0 indicated that no participant was available for assessment at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 30.09 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.312
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 60.12 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.269
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 90.16 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 120.15 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.281
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 180.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.268
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 240.15 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.252
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 300.16 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.291
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 360.16 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.315
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 420.08 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.303
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 480.07 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.246
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 360.21 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.306
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 30.12 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.266
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 240.18 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.312
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 60.14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.271
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 480.15 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.319
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 90.16 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.271
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 300.19 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.303
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 120.17 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.288
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 420.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.287
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility ScoreMonth 180.17 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.293
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state profile (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The Visual Analogue Scale is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state.

Time frame: Baseline (Day- 24), Months 3, 6, 9, 12 ,18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48

Population: ITT population: participants randomized into the study; classified according to assigned treatment group, regardless actual treatment received. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants who were analyzed at each specified timepoint, for each arm, respectively. n=0 indicated that no participant was available for assessment at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 910.08 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.475
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 2410.62 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.531
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 67.51 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.957
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 3012.38 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.817
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 1211.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.139
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 3612 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.856
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 4212.88 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.789
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 34.27 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.38
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 489.17 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.612
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 1810.75 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.146
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 4811.93 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.031
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 39.37 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.222
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 611.02 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.168
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 912.51 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.564
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 1210.93 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.447
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 1815.35 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.168
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 2412.17 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.592
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 3014.41 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.305
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 4214.33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.502
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Month 3613.94 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.984
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR: participants with confirmed response (PR or better) as time between first documentation of response and disease progression per IMWG response criteria, or death due to PD, whichever occurs first. PD: Increase of 25% from lowest response value in any one of following: Serum M-component (absolute increase\>=0.5 g/dL); Urine M-component (absolute increase\>=200 mg/24 hours); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase \>10mg/dL); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels and without measurable disease by FLC levels, bone marrow PC%(absolute%\>=10%); Bone marrow PC's %: absolute%\>10%; Definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas/definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas and Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to PC proliferative disorder.

Time frame: From first documentation of response up to 2.4 years

Population: Response-evaluable set: participants who have a confirmed diagnosis of MM and measurable disease at baseline or screening. Participants must have received at least one component of study treatment and have adequate post-baseline disease assessments. Here 'N'(overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable for this endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Duration of Response (DOR)21.3 Months
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Duration of Response (DOR)NA Months
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

The Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a partial response (PR) or better, according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, during the study or during follow up. IMWG criteria for PR: greater than or equal to (\>=) 50 percentage (%) reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urinary M-protein by \>=90% or to \<200 mg/24 hours, if the serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of \>=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria, If serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, and serum free light assay is also not measurable, \>=50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells (PCs) is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell percentage was \>=30%, in addition to the above criteria, if present at baseline, a \>=50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required.

Time frame: From randomization (Day -3) up to 2.4 years

Population: ITT population included all participants randomized into the study; classified according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Overall Response Rate (ORR)73.9 Percentage of participants
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Overall Response Rate (ORR)90.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival (OS) was measured from the date of randomization to date of death. Median Overall Survival was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From randomization (Day -3) up to 8.3 years

Population: ITT population included all participants randomized into the study; classified according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Overall Survival (OS)53.59 Months
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Overall Survival (OS)82.96 Months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein Response

Percentage of participants with Best M- protein response of 100% reduction and \>=90% to \< 100% reduction were assessed. Best M-protein response was defined as the maximal percent reduction or the lowest percent increase from baseline in serum M-protein for participants with measurable heavy chain at baseline or urine M-protein for participants without measurable heavy chain, but with measurable light chain disease at baseline. For participants without measurable heavy chain and light chain disease at baseline, best response in serum free light chain (FLC) was defined as the maximal percent reduction or the lowest percent increase from baseline in the difference between involved and uninvolved serum FLC level (dFLC).

Time frame: Up to 2.4 years

Population: Response-evaluable set: participants have confirmed diagnosis of MM and measurable disease at baseline or screening. Participants must receive at least one component of study treatment, have adequate post-baseline disease assessments. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein ResponseBest M-protein response in serum: 100% reduction38.7 Percentage of participants
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein ResponseBest M-protein response in serum:>= 90 to < 100%14.6 Percentage of participants
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein ResponseBest M-protein response in urine:100% reduction69.4 Percentage of participants
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein ResponseBest M-protein response in urine:>=90 to < 100%13.9 Percentage of participants
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein ResponseBest response in dFLC:100% reduction0 Percentage of participants
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein ResponseBest response in dFLC: >=90% to < 100% reduction77.8 Percentage of participants
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein ResponseBest response in dFLC:100% reduction0 Percentage of participants
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein ResponseBest M-protein response in serum: 100% reduction58.5 Percentage of participants
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein ResponseBest M-protein response in urine:>=90 to < 100%7.1 Percentage of participants
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein ResponseBest M-protein response in serum:>= 90 to < 100%15.2 Percentage of participants
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein ResponseBest response in dFLC: >=90% to < 100% reduction100.0 Percentage of participants
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein ResponseBest M-protein response in urine:100% reduction90.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Better

CR or better rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a CR or better (i.e. CR and sCR) as per IMWG criteria. CR: as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and less than (\<) 5 percent plasma cells in bone marrow; sCR: CR plus normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry.

Time frame: From randomization (Day -3) up to 2.4 years

Population: ITT population included all participants randomized into the study; classified according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Better24.4 Percentage of participants
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Better42.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)

The Minimal Residual Disease negativity rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had negative MRD (detection of less than 1 malignant cell among 100,000 normal cells) assessment at any timepoint after the first dose of study drugs by evaluation of bone marrow aspirates or whole blood at 10\^-5 threshold. MRD was evaluated by using Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing of immunoglobulin genes. MRD was assessed in participants who achieved complete response or stringent complete response (CR/sCR).

Time frame: From randomization (Day -3) up to 8.3 years

Population: ITT population included all participants randomized into the study; classified according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Percentage of Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)7.0 Percentage of participants
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Percentage of Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)28.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)

sCR as per IMWG criteria is CR plus normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry. CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine; Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas; \<5% plasma cells (PCs) in bone marrow.

Time frame: From randomization (Day -3) up to 2.4 years

Population: ITT population included all participants randomized into the study; classified according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)7.0 Percentage of participants
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)18.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better

VGPR or better rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved VGPR or complete response (CR) (including stringent complete response\[sCR\]) according to the IMWG criteria during or after the study treatment. VGPR: Serum and urine component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, or \>= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level less than (\<) 100 milligram (mg) per 24 hour; CR: negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5% plasms cells (PCs) in bone marrow; sCR: CR in addition to having a normal FLC ratio and an absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, 2-4 color flow cytometry.

Time frame: From randomization (Day -3) up to 2.4 years

Population: ITT population included all participants randomized into the study; classified according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better49.7 Percentage of participants
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better71.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival on Next Line of Therapy (PFS2)

Progression-free survival after next-line therapy is defined as the time from randomization to progression on the next line of subsequent antimyeloma therapy or death due to any cause (prior to start of second line of antimyeloma therapy), whichever comes first. Disease progression on next line of treatment was based on investigator judgment.

Time frame: From randomization (Day -3) up to 8.3 years

Population: ITT population included all participants randomized into the study; classified according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Progression Free Survival on Next Line of Therapy (PFS2)42.41 Months
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Progression Free Survival on Next Line of Therapy (PFS2)66.73 Months
Secondary

Time to Disease Progression (TTP)

TTP: Time from date of randomization to date of first documented evidence of PD or death due to PD, whichever occurs first. PD per IMWG criteria- Increase of 25 % from lowest response value in one of following: Serum M-component (absolute increase \>=0.5 g/dL); Urine M-component (absolute increase \>=200 mg/24 hours); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase \>10 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels and without measurable disease by FLC levels, bone marrow plasma cells (PC)% (absolute % \>=10%); Bone marrow PC %: absolute % \>10%; Definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas and Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to the PC proliferative disorder.

Time frame: From randomization (Day -3) up to 2.4 years

Population: ITT population included all participants randomized into the study; classified according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Time to Disease Progression (TTP)19.35 Months
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Time to Disease Progression (TTP)NA Months
Secondary

Time to Next Treatment (TNT)

Time to next treatment is defined as the time from randomization to the start of the next-line treatment. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis.

Time frame: From randomization (Day -3) up to 8.3 years

Population: ITT population included all participants randomized into the study; classified according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Time to Next Treatment (TNT)25.9 Months
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Time to Next Treatment (TNT)66.8 Months
Secondary

Time to Response

Time to response, defined as the time between the date of randomization and the first efficacy evaluation that the participant has met all criteria for PR or better. PR: \>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by \>=90% or to \<200 mg/24 hours; If the serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of \>=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria; If serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, and serum free light assay is also not measurable, \>=50% reduction in bone marrow PCs is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell percentage was \>=30%. In addition to the above criteria, if present at baseline, a \>=50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required.

Time frame: From randomization (Day -3) up to 2.4 years

Population: Response-evaluable population: participants who have a confirmed diagnosis of MM and measurable disease at baseline or screening, must receive at least one component of study treatment and have adequate post-baseline disease assessments. Here, 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable for this endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Time to Response0.82 Months
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Time to Response0.79 Months
Post Hoc

Progression Free Survival at Data Cutoff Date of 24 June 2019

PFS: duration from date of randomization to PD/death, whichever occurs first. PD per IMWG criteria-Increase of 25% from lowest response value in one of following: Serum M-component (absolute increase \>=0.5 g/dL); Urine M-component (absolute increase \>=200 mg/24 hours); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase \>10 mg/dL); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, without measurable disease by FLC levels, bone marrow PC %(absolute % \>=10%); Bone marrow PC %: absolute % \>10 %; Definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas/definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas and development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium \>11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to the PC proliferative disorder.

Time frame: From randomization (Day -3) up to 4.4 years

Population: ITT population included all participants randomized into the study; classified according to assigned treatment group, regardless of the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)Progression Free Survival at Data Cutoff Date of 24 June 201919.29 Months
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)Progression Free Survival at Data Cutoff Date of 24 June 201936.40 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 7, 2026