Skip to content

Safety and Immunogenicity of Three Formulations of Takeda's Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TDV)

A Randomized, Double Blind, Phase 2 Study to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of Three Formulations of Takeda's Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TDV) in Healthy Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02193087
Enrollment
1002
Registered
2014-07-17
Start date
2014-08-06
Completion date
2015-05-19
Last updated
2019-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dengue Fever

Keywords

Drug therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the equivalence of the lyophilized formulation of Takeda's Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TDV) compared with the liquid formulation of TDV.

Detailed description

The vaccine being tested in this study is Takeda's Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TDV). This study is designed to determine whether the lyophilized formulation provides equivalent safety and immunogenicity as the original liquid formulation. An exploratory analysis has been added for the purpose of understanding whether there is a manufacturing or formulation effect on the vaccine. The study will enroll approximately 1000 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to one of the four study groups-which will remain undisclosed to the participant and study doctor during the study (unless there is an urgent medical need): * Group A: TDV Liquid Formulation 1, subcutaneous (SC) injection on Day 1 and placebo (dummy) SC at Month 3 - this is a liquid that looks like the study drug but has no active ingredient * Group B: TDV Liquid Formulation 1, SC injection Day 1 and Month 3 * Group C: TDV Liquid Formulation 2, SC injection Day 1 and Month 3 * Group D: TDV Lyophilized formulation SC injection Day 1 and Month 3 In order to keep the treatment arms undisclosed to the participant and the doctor, participants will receive a placebo injection at any study visit where TDV is not being administered (Month 3). Participants will be asked to record any adverse events that may be related to the vaccine or the injection in a diary card for 28 days after each vaccination. This multi-center trial will be conducted in the United States. The overall time to participate in this study is up to 10 months. Participants will make 9 visits to the clinic including a final visit 1 month after last dose of study drug for a follow-up assessment. A follow up phone call will be done 6 months after the last dose to assess serious adverse events.

Interventions

DRUGTDV Liquid Formulation 1

TDV Liquid Formulation 1 for subcutaneous injection

DRUGTDV Liquid Formulation 2

TDV Liquid Formulation 2 for subcutaneous injection

DRUGTDV IDT Lyophilized

TDV Lyophilized Formulation for subcutaneous injection

DRUGPlacebo

TDV liquid formulation placebo-matching solution for subcutaneous injection

Sponsors

Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Is aged 18 to 49 years, at the time of enrollment inclusive. 2. Individuals who are in good health at the time of entry into the trial as determined by medical history, physical examination (including vital signs) and clinical judgment of the investigator. 3. Signs and dates a written, informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any trial procedures, after the nature of the trial has been explained according to local regulatory requirements. 4. Individuals who can comply with trial procedures and are available for the duration of follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

1. Febrile illness (temperature ≥ 38°C or 100.4°F) or moderate or severe acute illness or infection at the time of enrollment. Trial entry should be delayed until the illness has improved. 2. History or any illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the results of the trial or pose additional risk to the participants due to participation in the trial, including but not limited to: a. Known hypersensitivity or allergy to any of the vaccine components; b. Individuals with history of substance or alcohol abuse within the past 6 months; c. Female participants who are pregnant or breastfeeding; d. Individuals with any serious chronic or progressive disease according to judgment of the investigator (e.g., neoplasm, insulin dependent diabetes, cardiac, renal or hepatic disease, neurologic or seizure disorder or Guillain-Barré syndrome); e. Known or suspected impairment/alteration of immune function, including: i. Chronic use of oral steroids (equivalent to 20 mg/day prednisone ≥ 12 weeks / ≥ 2 mg/kg body weight / day prednisone ≥ 2 weeks) within 60 days prior to Day 1 (use of inhaled, intranasal, or topical corticosteroids is allowed); Receipt of parenteral steroids (equivalent to 20 mg/day prednisone ≥ 12 weeks / ≥ 2 mg/kg body weight / day prednisone ≥ 2 weeks) within 60 days prior to Day 1; iii. Administration of immunoglobulins and/or any blood products within the three months preceding the first administration of the investigational vaccine or planned administration during the trial; iv. Receipt of immunostimulants within 60 days prior to Day 1; v. Immunosuppressive therapy such as anti-cancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy within 6 months preceding (first) vaccination; vi. human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or HIV-related disease; vii. Genetic immunodeficiency. 3. Individuals who received any other vaccines within 14 days (for inactivated vaccines) or 28 days (for live vaccines) prior to enrollment in this trial or who are planning to receive any vaccine within 28 days of investigational vaccine administration. 4. Individuals participating in any clinical trial with another investigational product 30 days prior to first trial visit or intent to participate in another clinical trial at any time during the conduct of this trial. 5. Individuals who are first degree relatives of individuals involved in trial conduct. 6. If female of childbearing potential, sexually active, and has not used any of the acceptable contraceptive methods for at least 2 months prior to trial entry: a. Of childbearing potential is defined as status post onset of menarche and not meeting any of the following conditions: menopausal (for at least 2 years), bilateral tubal ligation (at least 1 year previously), bilateral oophorectomy (at least 1 year previously) or hysterectomy; b. Acceptable birth control methods are defined as one or more of the following: i. Hormonal contraceptive (such as oral, injection, transdermal patch, implant, cervical ring); ii. Barrier (condom with spermicide or diaphragm with spermicide) each and every time during intercourse; iii. Intrauterine device (IUD); iv. Monogamous relationship with vasectomized partner. Partner must have been vasectomized for at least six months prior to the participants' trial entry. 7. If female of childbearing potential, sexually active and refuses to use an acceptable contraceptive method through to 6 weeks after the last dose of investigational vaccine. 8. Individuals with body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 35. 9. Participants who received previous vaccination (in a clinical trial or with an approved product) against flaviviruses including dengue, yellow fever (YF), West Nile (WN), Japanese Encephalitis (JE), and St. Louis encephalitis. 10. Documented or suspected disease caused by dengue, JE, WN, YF virus, and/or St. Louis encephalitis. 11. History of travel to dengue endemic areas including the Caribbean, Mexico, Central America, South America or Southeast Asia during the 6 months prior to screening or planned travel to a dengue endemic area during the study period. 12. Clinically significant abnormality in the screening laboratory tests as judged by the Investigator. 13. History of recurring headaches or migraines (more frequent than once per week) or on prescription medication for treatment of recurring headaches or migraines. 14. Blood tests positive for antibodies to HIV-1/2, Hepatitis C and Hepatitis B surface antigen.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D To Groups A and B CombinedMonth 1Geometric mean titer (GMT) of neutralizing antibodies for each of the four dengue serotypes as measured by Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test resulting in 50% reduction in Plaques (PRNT50). The four dengue serotypes are DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3 and DEN-4. A 90% Confidence Interval (CI) for the ratio of GMT (or equivalently the difference of the log transformed GMT) was provided, for each serotype, for the comparison of the lyophilized formulation (Group D) versus the liquid formulation 1 (Groups A+B combined). An Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) model for the natural log-transformed GMT at month 1 with study group as a factor was used for analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Groups A and B CombinedMonth 1A seropositive response is defined as a reciprocal neutralizing titer ≥ 10. The four dengue serotypes are DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3 and DEN-4.
Percentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonths 1 and 4A seropositive response is defined as a reciprocal neutralizing titer ≥ 10. The four dengue serotypes are DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3 and DEN-4.
Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Days 1 through 7 after each vaccinationSolicited local AEs at injection site are defined as pain, erythema and swelling that occurred at least once within 7 days after either vaccination, as recorded by the participants in a diary. Percentages are based on the number of participants with diary data available.
Percentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Days 1 through 14 after each vaccinationSolicited systemic AEs are defined as asthenia, fever, headache, malaise, and myalgia that occurred at least once within 14 days after either vaccination, as recorded by the participants in a diary. Percentages are based on the number of participants with diary data available.
Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonths 1 and 4Geometric mean titer (GMT) of neutralizing antibodies for each of the four dengue serotypes as measured by Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test resulting in 50% reduction in Plaques (PRNT50). The four dengue serotypes are DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3 and DEN-4. ANOVA model for the natural log-transformed GMT at month 1 with study group as a factor was used for analysis.
Percentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityDays 1 through 14 after each vaccinationThe percentage of participants with solicited systemic AEs of varying severity are reported. Solicited systemic AEs are defined as asthenia, fever, headache, malaise, and myalgia that occurred at least once within 14 days after either vaccination, as recorded by the participants in a diary. Participants with multiple episodes are categorized using the highest severity level. Percentages are based on the number of participants with diary data available.
Percentage of Participants With Any Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)Up to Day 28 after each vaccinationUnsolicited AEs are any AEs that are not solicited local or systemic AEs, as defined by this study, that occurred at least once within 28 days after either vaccination. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assessed whether the AE was related to the study vaccination.
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to 6 Months after the last dose (9 months)A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability / incapacity, is a congenital anomaly / birth defect or is medically important due to other reasons than the above mentioned criteria.
Percentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetDays 8, 15, 91, 97 and 104Percentage of participants with markedly abnormal standard safety laboratory values collected at any time after the first vaccination.
Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityDays 1 through 7 after each vaccinationThe percentage of participants with solicited local AEs at injection site of varying severity are reported. Solicited local AEs are defined as pain, erythema and swelling that occurred at least once within 7 days after either vaccination, as recorded by the participants in a diary. Participants with multiple episodes are categorized using the highest severity level. Percentages are based on the number of participants with diary data available.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 7 investigative sites in the United States from 22 July 2014 to 19 May 2015.

Pre-assignment details

Healthy volunteers were enrolled in a 2:1:1:6 ratio into 1 of 4 study groups: 1 study group received 1 dose and 3 study groups received 2 doses.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A: TDV Liquid + Placebo
Takeda's Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine Candidate (TDV) Liquid Formulation 1, diluted 1:5 with vaccine diluent, subcutaneous injection on Day 1, and TDV Liquid Formulation placebo-matching solution, subcutaneous injection, once on Day 90 (Month 3).
199
Group B: TDV Liquid
TDV Liquid Formulation 1, diluted 1:5 with vaccine diluent, subcutaneous injection on Day 1 and Day 90 (Month 3).
100
Group C: TDV Liquid
TDV Liquid Formulation 2, subcutaneous injection on Day 1 and Day 90 (Month 3).
100
Group D: TDV Lyophilized
TDV Lyophilized Formulation reconstituted with water, subcutaneous injection on Day 1 and Day 90 (Month 3).
603
Total1,002

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event20011
Overall StudyDid Not Receive Any Vaccination2301
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up146437
Overall StudyOther Reason Not Specified7219
Overall StudyProtocol Violation2012
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject103119

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalGroup A: TDV Liquid + PlaceboGroup B: TDV LiquidGroup C: TDV LiquidGroup D: TDV Lyophilized
Age, Continuous32.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.88
32.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.66
30.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.72
34.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
31.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.89
Age, Customized
Adults (18-64 Years)
1002 participants199 participants100 participants100 participants603 participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)26.57 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.494
26.71 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.18
26.81 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.496
26.30 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.006
26.53 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.513
Height170.42 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.689
169.55 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.284
171.13 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.466
169.84 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.727
170.69 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.68
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
15 participants4 participants2 participants1 participants8 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
25 participants5 participants1 participants3 participants16 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
250 participants51 participants27 participants26 participants146 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
203 participants40 participants22 participants21 participants120 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
1 participants9 participants3 participants0 participants8 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiracial
19 participants3 participants1 participants0 participants15 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
5 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic or Latino
767 participants152 participants75 participants76 participants464 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
28 participants7 participants3 participants3 participants15 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
3 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
668 participants125 participants66 participants69 participants408 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
1002 participants199 participants100 participants100 participants603 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
505 Participants109 Participants51 Participants47 Participants298 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
497 Participants90 Participants49 Participants53 Participants305 Participants
Weight77.37 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.569
76.95 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.362
78.96 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.878
75.96 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.099
77.49 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.649

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
50 / 19734 / 9729 / 100178 / 602
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1971 / 970 / 1008 / 602

Outcome results

Primary

Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D To Groups A and B Combined

Geometric mean titer (GMT) of neutralizing antibodies for each of the four dengue serotypes as measured by Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test resulting in 50% reduction in Plaques (PRNT50). The four dengue serotypes are DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3 and DEN-4. A 90% Confidence Interval (CI) for the ratio of GMT (or equivalently the difference of the log transformed GMT) was provided, for each serotype, for the comparison of the lyophilized formulation (Group D) versus the liquid formulation 1 (Groups A+B combined). An Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) model for the natural log-transformed GMT at month 1 with study group as a factor was used for analysis.

Time frame: Month 1

Population: Per-Protocol Set (PPS) included all randomized participants who received the planned number of investigational vaccine doses, had serology data at Baseline and Month 1 and had no major protocol violations. Participants seropositive at Baseline are not included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Group A + Group B CombinedGeometric Mean Titer (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D To Groups A and B CombinedDEN-1635.04 titer
Group A + Group B CombinedGeometric Mean Titer (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D To Groups A and B CombinedDEN-215104.68 titer
Group A + Group B CombinedGeometric Mean Titer (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D To Groups A and B CombinedDEN-3186.32 titer
Group A + Group B CombinedGeometric Mean Titer (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D To Groups A and B CombinedDEN-488.87 titer
Group D: TDV LyophilizedGeometric Mean Titer (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D To Groups A and B CombinedDEN-465.67 titer
Group D: TDV LyophilizedGeometric Mean Titer (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D To Groups A and B CombinedDEN-1181.23 titer
Group D: TDV LyophilizedGeometric Mean Titer (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D To Groups A and B CombinedDEN-3272.75 titer
Group D: TDV LyophilizedGeometric Mean Titer (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D To Groups A and B CombinedDEN-216072.59 titer
Comparison: DEN-190% CI: [0.23, 0.36]
Comparison: DEN-290% CI: [0.9, 1.26]
Comparison: DEN-390% CI: [1.13, 1.89]
Comparison: DEN-490% CI: [0.57, 0.95]
Secondary

Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group B

Geometric mean titer (GMT) of neutralizing antibodies for each of the four dengue serotypes as measured by Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test resulting in 50% reduction in Plaques (PRNT50). The four dengue serotypes are DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3 and DEN-4. ANOVA model for the natural log-transformed GMT at month 1 with study group as a factor was used for analysis.

Time frame: Months 1 and 4

Population: PPS included all randomized participants who received the planned number of investigational vaccine doses, had serology data at Baseline and Month 1 and had no major protocol violations. Participants seropositive at Baseline are not included. n in each of the categories is the number of participants with data available at the given time-point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Group A + Group B CombinedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-1 (n=74, 454)627.56 titer
Group A + Group B CombinedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-2 (n=74, 454)17876.66 titer
Group A + Group B CombinedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-3 (n=74, 454)220.29 titer
Group A + Group B CombinedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-4 (n=74, 454)88.25 titer
Group A + Group B CombinedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-1 (n=73, 435)267.80 titer
Group A + Group B CombinedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-2 (n=73, 435)4160.29 titer
Group A + Group B CombinedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-3 (n=73, 435)106.98 titer
Group A + Group B CombinedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-4 (n=73, 435)31.56 titer
Group D: TDV LyophilizedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-4 (n=73, 435)28.84 titer
Group D: TDV LyophilizedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-1 (n=74, 454)181.23 titer
Group D: TDV LyophilizedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-1 (n=73, 435)113.43 titer
Group D: TDV LyophilizedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-2 (n=74, 454)16072.59 titer
Group D: TDV LyophilizedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-3 (n=73, 435)132.73 titer
Group D: TDV LyophilizedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-3 (n=74, 454)272.75 titer
Group D: TDV LyophilizedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-2 (n=73, 435)3772.95 titer
Group D: TDV LyophilizedGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) of Neutralizing Antibodies for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-4 (n=74, 454)65.67 titer
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Any Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)

Unsolicited AEs are any AEs that are not solicited local or systemic AEs, as defined by this study, that occurred at least once within 28 days after either vaccination. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assessed whether the AE was related to the study vaccination.

Time frame: Up to Day 28 after each vaccination

Population: SS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine (or placebo), including a partial dose.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Any Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)40.1 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Any Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)47.4 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Any Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)45.0 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Any Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)43.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group B

A seropositive response is defined as a reciprocal neutralizing titer ≥ 10. The four dengue serotypes are DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3 and DEN-4.

Time frame: Months 1 and 4

Population: PPS included all randomized participants who received the planned number of investigational vaccine doses, had serology data at Baseline and Month 1 and had no major protocol violations. Participants seropositive at Baseline are not included. n in each of the categories is the number of participants with data available at the given time-point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-3 (n=74, 454)95.9 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-4 (n=74, 454)78.4 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-1 (n=73, 435)97.3 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-2 (n=73, 435)100.0 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-3 (n=73, 435)98.6 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-4 (n=73, 435)83.6 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-1 (n=74, 454)97.3 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-2 (n=74, 454)100.0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-2 (n=74, 454)99.6 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-3 (n=74, 454)93.4 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-3 (n=73, 435)98.9 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-4 (n=74, 454)80.0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 1 DEN-1 (n=74, 454)93.6 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-1 (n=73, 435)98.2 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-4 (n=73, 435)79.3 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Group BMonth 4 DEN-2 (n=73, 435)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Groups A and B Combined

A seropositive response is defined as a reciprocal neutralizing titer ≥ 10. The four dengue serotypes are DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3 and DEN-4.

Time frame: Month 1

Population: Per-Protocol Set (PPS) included all randomized participants who received the planned number of investigational vaccine doses, had serology data at Baseline and Month 1, and have no major protocol violations. Participants seropositive at Baseline are not included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Groups A and B CombinedDEN-197.7 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Groups A and B CombinedDEN-2100.0 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Groups A and B CombinedDEN-391.8 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Groups A and B CombinedDEN-480.9 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Groups A and B CombinedDEN-480.0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Groups A and B CombinedDEN-193.6 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Groups A and B CombinedDEN-393.4 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With a Seropositive Response for Each of the Four Dengue Serotypes Comparing Group D With Groups A and B CombinedDEN-299.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-Set

Percentage of participants with markedly abnormal standard safety laboratory values collected at any time after the first vaccination.

Time frame: Days 8, 15, 91, 97 and 104

Population: The Safety Laboratory Sub-Set included randomly chosen participants from each treatment group for whom samples for clinical safety lab tests were collected and who received at least one vaccination dose. n in each of the categories is the number of participants with data available at the given time-point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetProthrombin Time0 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetPlatelet Count0 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetNeutrophils (%)0.8 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetBUN (n=121,61,64,404)0 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetEosinophils (%)2.5 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetLymphocytes (%)0 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetAST(SGOT) (n=121,61,64,404)2.5 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetHemoglobin0 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetLymphocytes (Abs.)0.8 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetAlkaline Phosphatase (n=121,61,64,404)0.8 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetALT(SGPT) (n=121,61,64,404)3.3 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetaPTT0 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetEosinophils (Abs.)0.8 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetNeutrophils (Abs.)2.5 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetALT(SGPT) (n=121,61,64,404)0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetHemoglobin0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetNeutrophils (Abs.)0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetLymphocytes (Abs.)0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetEosinophils (Abs.)1.6 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetNeutrophils (%)0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetLymphocytes (%)0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetEosinophils (%)1.6 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetPlatelet Count0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetProthrombin Time0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetaPTT0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetAST(SGOT) (n=121,61,64,404)0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetAlkaline Phosphatase (n=121,61,64,404)0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetBUN (n=121,61,64,404)0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetALT(SGPT) (n=121,61,64,404)3.1 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetAlkaline Phosphatase (n=121,61,64,404)0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetNeutrophils (Abs.)0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetEosinophils (Abs.)0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetAST(SGOT) (n=121,61,64,404)1.6 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetHemoglobin0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetaPTT0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetPlatelet Count0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetLymphocytes (%)0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetLymphocytes (Abs.)0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetNeutrophils (%)0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetBUN (n=121,61,64,404)0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetEosinophils (%)0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetProthrombin Time0 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetEosinophils (%)0.5 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetPlatelet Count0.2 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetAlkaline Phosphatase (n=121,61,64,404)0.2 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetProthrombin Time0.7 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetLymphocytes (Abs.)0.5 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetaPTT0.5 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetNeutrophils (Abs.)0.5 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetALT(SGPT) (n=121,61,64,404)1.7 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetBUN (n=121,61,64,404)0.2 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetAST(SGOT) (n=121,61,64,404)1.5 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetNeutrophils (%)0.2 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetHemoglobin0.2 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetLymphocytes (%)0.5 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values in the Safety Sub-SetEosinophils (Abs.)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability / incapacity, is a congenital anomaly / birth defect or is medically important due to other reasons than the above mentioned criteria.

Time frame: Up to 6 Months after the last dose (9 months)

Population: SS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine (or placebo), including a partial dose.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)1.0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)1.0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)0 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)1.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)

Solicited local AEs at injection site are defined as pain, erythema and swelling that occurred at least once within 7 days after either vaccination, as recorded by the participants in a diary. Percentages are based on the number of participants with diary data available.

Time frame: Days 1 through 7 after each vaccination

Population: Participants from the Safety Set (SS) with evaluable data and who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine (or placebo), including a partial dose. n in each of the categories is the number of participants with data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Pain (n=191, 95, 99, 583)43.5 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Swelling (n=191, 95, 99, 582)11.5 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Erythema (n=191, 95, 99, 582)35.6 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Erythema (n=191, 95, 99, 582)41.1 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Pain (n=191, 95, 99, 583)48.4 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Swelling (n=191, 95, 99, 582)20.0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Erythema (n=191, 95, 99, 582)37.4 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Pain (n=191, 95, 99, 583)45.1 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Swelling (n=191, 95, 99, 582)14.3 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Pain (n=191, 95, 99, 583)51.5 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Swelling (n=191, 95, 99, 582)24.2 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Erythema (n=191, 95, 99, 582)51.5 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Erythema (n=191, 95, 99, 582)43.0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Pain (n=191, 95, 99, 583)45.3 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs)Swelling (n=191, 95, 99, 582)21.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity

The percentage of participants with solicited local AEs at injection site of varying severity are reported. Solicited local AEs are defined as pain, erythema and swelling that occurred at least once within 7 days after either vaccination, as recorded by the participants in a diary. Participants with multiple episodes are categorized using the highest severity level. Percentages are based on the number of participants with diary data available.

Time frame: Days 1 through 7 after each vaccination

Population: Participants from the SS with evaluable data and who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine (or placebo), including a partial dose. n in each of the categories is the number of participants with data available for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeveritySwelling_Mild (n=191, 95, 99, 582)1.6 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityPain_Mild (n=191, 95, 99, 583)34.6 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityPain_Moderate (n=191, 95, 99, 583)6.8 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityPain_Severe (n=191, 95, 99, 583)2.1 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityErythema_Mild (n=191, 95, 99, 582)18.3 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityErythema_Moderate (n=191, 95, 99, 582)2.1 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityErythema_Severe (n=191, 95, 99, 582)0 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeveritySwelling_Moderate (n=191, 95, 99, 582)0 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeveritySwelling_Severe (n=191, 95, 99, 582)0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityPain_Severe (n=191, 95, 99, 583)3.2 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityErythema_Moderate (n=191, 95, 99, 582)9.5 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeveritySwelling_Severe (n=191, 95, 99, 582)0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeveritySwelling_Moderate (n=191, 95, 99, 582)3.2 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityPain_Moderate (n=191, 95, 99, 583)8.4 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityErythema_Severe (n=191, 95, 99, 582)0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityPain_Mild (n=191, 95, 99, 583)36.8 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityErythema_Mild (n=191, 95, 99, 582)22.1 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeveritySwelling_Mild (n=191, 95, 99, 582)5.3 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityPain_Severe (n=191, 95, 99, 583)2.0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeveritySwelling_Severe (n=191, 95, 99, 582)0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityErythema_Mild (n=191, 95, 99, 582)18.2 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityPain_Mild (n=191, 95, 99, 583)41.4 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityPain_Moderate (n=191, 95, 99, 583)8.1 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeveritySwelling_Mild (n=191, 95, 99, 582)9.1 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityErythema_Moderate (n=191, 95, 99, 582)11.1 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeveritySwelling_Moderate (n=191, 95, 99, 582)5.1 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityErythema_Severe (n=191, 95, 99, 582)0 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeveritySwelling_Severe (n=191, 95, 99, 582)0.2 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityPain_Severe (n=191, 95, 99, 583)1.2 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityErythema_Mild (n=191, 95, 99, 582)16.0 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeveritySwelling_Moderate (n=191, 95, 99, 582)1.4 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityErythema_Moderate (n=191, 95, 99, 582)6.4 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityPain_Moderate (n=191, 95, 99, 583)9.3 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityErythema_Severe (n=191, 95, 99, 582)0.2 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeveritySwelling_Mild (n=191, 95, 99, 582)5.0 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local (Injection Site) Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityPain_Mild (n=191, 95, 99, 583)34.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)

Solicited systemic AEs are defined as asthenia, fever, headache, malaise, and myalgia that occurred at least once within 14 days after either vaccination, as recorded by the participants in a diary. Percentages are based on the number of participants with diary data available.

Time frame: Days 1 through 14 after each vaccination

Population: Participants from the SS with evaluable data and who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine (or placebo), including a partial dose.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Myalgia30.4 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Asthenia27.7 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Fever (≥38 °C)1.6 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Malaise29.3 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Headache40.8 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Malaise27.4 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Myalgia38.9 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Fever (≥38 °C)3.2 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Asthenia23.2 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Headache43.2 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Malaise25.3 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Headache38.4 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Asthenia25.3 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Myalgia30.3 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Fever (≥38 °C)1.0 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Myalgia33.2 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Asthenia26.9 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Headache41.1 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Malaise25.3 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)Fever (≥38 °C)1.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity

The percentage of participants with solicited systemic AEs of varying severity are reported. Solicited systemic AEs are defined as asthenia, fever, headache, malaise, and myalgia that occurred at least once within 14 days after either vaccination, as recorded by the participants in a diary. Participants with multiple episodes are categorized using the highest severity level. Percentages are based on the number of participants with diary data available.

Time frame: Days 1 through 14 after each vaccination

Population: Participants from the SS with evaluable data and who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine (or placebo), including a partial dose.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityAsthenia_Moderate5.8 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityHeadache_Moderate8.4 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityHeadache_Severe5.2 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityAsthenia_Mild18.8 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityHeadache_Mild27.2 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityAsthenia_Severe3.1 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMalaise_Mild17.8 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMalaise_Moderate7.3 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMalaise_Severe4.2 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMyalgia_Mild20.9 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMyalgia_Moderate7.3 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMyalgia_Severe2.1 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_38.0 - 38.4 °C1.0 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_38.5 - 38.9 °C0.5 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_39.0 - 40.0 °C0 percentage of participants
Group A + Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_>40 °C0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityAsthenia_Severe1.1 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMalaise_Severe2.1 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_>40 °C0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMyalgia_Severe4.2 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_39.0 - 40.0 °C0 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMyalgia_Mild23.2 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityHeadache_Severe7.4 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMyalgia_Moderate11.6 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityAsthenia_Moderate10.5 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMalaise_Mild15.8 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityAsthenia_Mild11.6 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityHeadache_Moderate9.5 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_38.0 - 38.4 °C2.1 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMalaise_Moderate9.5 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_38.5 - 38.9 °C1.1 percentage of participants
Group D: TDV LyophilizedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityHeadache_Mild26.3 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityAsthenia_Severe2.0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityAsthenia_Moderate10.1 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_38.5 - 38.9 °C0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMalaise_Mild15.2 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMalaise_Moderate7.1 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_>40 °C0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMalaise_Severe3.0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMyalgia_Mild22.2 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_39.0 - 40.0 °C0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMyalgia_Moderate6.1 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMyalgia_Severe2.0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityHeadache_Mild21.2 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityHeadache_Moderate13.1 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_38.0 - 38.4 °C1.0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityHeadache_Severe4.0 percentage of participants
Group A and Group B CombinedPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityAsthenia_Mild13.1 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_>40 °C0 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMalaise_Moderate8.7 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityHeadache_Severe4.5 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityHeadache_Mild23.1 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_38.5 - 38.9 °C0.7 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMalaise_Mild14.0 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_38.0 - 38.4 °C1.0 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityHeadache_Moderate13.5 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityAsthenia_Moderate7.9 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMyalgia_Mild23.5 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityAsthenia_Severe2.6 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMyalgia_Moderate8.4 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityFever_39.0 - 40.0 °C0 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMalaise_Severe2.6 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityAsthenia_Mild16.4 percentage of participants
Group C: TDV LiquidPercentage of Participants With Solicited Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) by SeverityMyalgia_Severe1.4 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026