Skip to content

Pilot Investigation of Behavioral Alternatives to Indoor Tanning

Pilot Investigation of Behavioral Alternatives to Indoor Tanning

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02192918
Enrollment
74
Registered
2014-07-17
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2015-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Cancer

Brief summary

The goal of this research is to develop and test the feasibility of an intervention that stimulates uptake of healthy alternatives to tanning by providing free access to them for a limited time. Free access gives participants a low-risk opportunity to try something new that is consistent with their motivations. Free access also allows them to experience the reinforcing properties of the alternatives which could prime continued use after the free trial period. The objective of the present study is to determine the feasibility and short-term efficacy of providing free alternatives to indoor tanners in an effort to nudge them to switch from indoor tanning to healthy alternatives.

Detailed description

Melanoma is the second most common cancer diagnosed in young women and is responsible for nearly 8,000 US deaths per year. Exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) increases risk for melanoma. The International Agency for Research on Cancer assigned indoor tanning (IT; use of tanning beds or booths), as a class 1 carcinogen joining arsenic, asbestos, and mustard gas. Unfortunately, interventions educating tanners about the risks have not been very effective. Many tanners are more motivated by the immediate consequences of tanning than the delayed consequence of possibly getting cancer. Research shows the primary motivation for indoor tanning is to improve physical appearance, but a secondary motivation is stress reduction. Behavioral economics theory suggests that the rate of a behavior depends on 1) the reinforcing value of that behavior relative to alternatives, 2) the cost of engaging in the behavior relative to alternatives, and 3) the availability of the behavior relative to alternatives. The purpose of the present study is to determine whether exposure to healthy alternatives changes the behavior of indoor tanners. The investigators will randomize tanners to conditions differing in physical appearance and stress reduction alternatives to determine whether they can get their motivational needs met in healthier ways.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAirbrush

The American Academy of Dermatology Sun Smart pamphlet will be given at the baseline session. It has brief tips for reducing skin cancer risk, but does not mention sunless tanning or relaxation activities. Participants in the airbrush condition will receive 4 airbrush tan sessions, once every two weeks, over the course of 2 months.

BEHAVIORALAirbrush Plus

The American Academy of Dermatology Sun Smart pamphlet will be given at the baseline session. It has brief tips for reducing skin cancer risk, but does not mention sunless tanning or relaxation activities. Participants will complete 4 airbrush tan sessions, once every two weeks, over the course of 2 months. Additionally, they may choose 8 sessions, 1 per week, of the following activities at no cost: massage, pedicure, yoga class, or dance class.

BEHAVIORALDelayed Airbrush

The American Academy of Dermatology Sun Smart pamphlet will be given at the baseline session. It has brief tips for reducing skin cancer risk, but does not mention sunless tanning or relaxation activities. Participants will receive access to one of each of the following after the 6-month assessment at no cost: airbrush tan, massage, pedicure, yoga class, and dance class

Sponsors

University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
16 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Female * Ages 16-65 * Report minimum of 10 indoor tanning visits in the last year with intentions to continue

Exclusion criteria

* Ages \<16 or \>65 * Pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant during the study period * Reporting less than 10 indoor tanning visits per year * No intention to continue indoor tanning * Using sunless tanning more than once in the last year and ever in the last 3 months * Physically limited to do yoga or dance classes * DHA allergy * Inability to consent * Prisoners

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfactionup to 12 monthsA measure of satisfaction will be assessed for each alternative visit on a scale of 1-10 immediately after each activity is completed. Visits occur between baseline and 12 months of participation. Timing of visits depend on which condition is assigned.
Retention12 month follow-up% sessions complete and total withdrawn from study
Recruitment ratebaselineTotal randomized and total screened out.
Effort of alternatives6-month follow-upPerceived effort of alternatives will be discussed in a focus group setting.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
abstinence2-month follow-upthe percent of participants who abstained from indoor tanning.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost of indoor tanning2-month follow-upTotal amount spent on tanning since the previous assessment.
Tanning Dependence2-month follow-upmodified CAGE
Attitudes3-month follow-upIndoor Tanning Attitude Scale and the same scale modified for each of the alternatives
Stress Level2-month follow-upPerceived Stress Scale

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026