Skip to content

POLish Bifurcation Optimal Stenting Study

Regular DES Versus BiOSS Expert® Stent in Coronary Bifurcation Treatment - Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Controlled POLBOS I (POLish Bifurcation Optimal Stenting) Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02192840
Acronym
POLBOS
Enrollment
243
Registered
2014-07-17
Start date
2010-10-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2014-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

provisional T stenting, dedicated bifurcation stent

Brief summary

Coronary bifurcation lesions pose therapeutic problems during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and are associated with higher rates of periprocedural complications as well as higher rates of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. Therefore the optimal approach to coronary bifurcations treatment is still a subject of debate, especially when the side branch is large, not easily accessible and narrowed by a long lesion. One of the proposed alternatives are dedicated bifurcation stents (DBS). However, there is large scarcity of randomized trials with DBS. The aim of POLBOS I (POLish Bifurcation Optimal Stenting) study was to compare two intervention strategies for bifurcation treatment: provisional T-stenting (PTS) with any regular drug-eluting stent (rDES), the best treatment strategy at the moment, with stenting of bifurcation lesions with dedicated bifurcation paclitaxel-eluting stent BiOSS Expert® (Balton, PL).

Interventions

Coronary angioplasty in bifurcation lesion with drug-eluting stent implantation: BiOSS or regular DES (rDES)

Sponsors

University National Heart Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, Poland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits of receiving PCI for true bifurcation lesions, and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure. * Target main branch lesion(s) located in a native coronary artery with diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 4.5 mm. Target side branch lesion(s) located in a native coronary artery with diameter of ≥ 2.0 mm. * Target lesion(s) amenable for PCI with balloon angioplasty of the side branch.

Exclusion criteria

* STEMI * Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy \<1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment). * Subjects who refuse to give informed consent. * Subjects with LVEF\<30% * Subjects with moderate or severe degree valvular heart disease or primary cardiomyopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MACE12 monthsCumulative rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) with or without ST-segment elevation and need for repeated revascularization of the target lesion (TLR).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
all-cause death12 months
Target lesion revascularization12 months
cardiac death12 months
myocardial infarction12 months
late lumen loss12 months
Target vessel revascularization12 months

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026