Skip to content

Advanced XLIF Monitoring Pilot Study

Evaluation of Transcutaneous Stimulation of Lumbosacral Nerve Roots: A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02192112
Enrollment
57
Registered
2014-07-16
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2018-05-08
Last updated
2025-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease

Brief summary

Though the utility of NVM5 neuromonitoring by stimulating within the surgical site during XLIF has been demonstrated, it is hypothesized that more information may be gathered if a greater section of the motor neural pathway was monitored (i.e., stimulation above the surgical site and recording the subsequent muscle response in the lower limbs). Currently, there has not been demonstrated a practical method of stimulating the lumbosacral nerve roots locally, but well-above the surgical site in this fashion. This protocol is intended to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of using surface stimulation and return (anode) electrodes to stimulate the lumbosacral nerve roots, and record responses from the relevant innervated muscle groups of the lower limbs.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

NuVasive
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female spine surgery patients who are at least 18 years of age 2. Surgical candidates for lateral approach lumbar spine surgery at spinal levels L2 to L5, inclusive of L4-5 3. Patients who understand the conditions of enrollment and are willing to sign an informed consent to participate in the evaluation

Exclusion criteria

1. Currently undergoing surgical treatment at any spinal level other than L2 to L5, including S1 2. Pregnant women 3. Implanted pacemaker, defibrillator, or other electronic devices 4. Involved in active litigation relating to the spine (worker's compensation claim is allowed if it is not contested) 5. Underlying neurological disease or neurological deficit that is not associated with the condition for which he/she is seeking surgical intervention (e.g., diabetic peripheral neuropathy)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reproducibility of obtaining reliable responses and response thresholds monitored over the course of surgery.Intraoperative

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Correlation between patient characteristics and the ability to generate and reliably record responses and response thresholds.Intraoperative
Correlation of any observed changes in the response or response thresholds with surgical events.Intraoperative
Correlation between observed changes in the response or response threshold and postoperative neural status.6 weeks postoperative

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026