Skip to content

Comparison of Melatonin or Metformin and Dacarbazine Combination Versus Dacarbazine Alone in Disseminated Melanoma

Phase II Multicenter Randomized Study to Compare Dacarbazine With Melatonin or Metformin Versus Dacarbazine in the First Line Therapy of Disseminated Melanoma

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02190838
Enrollment
57
Registered
2014-07-15
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2019-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melanoma

Keywords

Melanoma, Melatonin, Metformin, Dacarbazine

Brief summary

Treatment of disseminated melanoma is still a difficult issue. Obvious achievements of recent years proves efficacy of immunologic approachees in this field. The ability of melatonin and metformin to decrease metabolic immunosuppression was shown in many experimental studies. Some literature data confirm the possibility of increasing efficacy of melatonin with dacarbazine (DTIC) and metformin with DTIC combinations. We hypothesized that this combinations could be more effective than DTIC monotherapy in terms of response rate and time to progression.

Interventions

DRUGMetformin

per os 850 mg BID

DRUGMelatonin

per os 3 mg daily

DRUGDacarbazine

IV 1 hour 1000 mg/m\^2 once in 28 days

Sponsors

N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>18. * Obtained Inform Consent * Morphologically confirmed disseminated Stage IV melanoma * Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale 0 - 2. * Expected survival \>3 month

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of active brain lesions (brain lesions after stereotaxic ray therapy allowed) * Evidence of liver and bone marrow clinically meaningful disfunction * Severe uncontrolled concomitant conditions and diseases * Pregnancy or lactation * Systemic therapy for disseminated melanoma * Second malignancy * Diabetes mellitus requiring drug therapy * Any condition preventing study participation by investigator opinion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response Rate23 months after FPFVPer Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. ORR is defined as the proportion of patients with a best overall response of complete response or partial response
Progression Free Survival23 months after FPFVAs per RECIST v1.1. progression-free survival (PFS) is the time from date of randomization/start of treatment to the date of event defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse events (AE) incidenceuntil 30 days after last patient treatment visitIncidence of AE classified using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for AE v4
Metabolic Changes Incidence23 months after FPFVNutritional status will be assessed using Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), Subjective global assessment (SGA), and Body Mass Index (BMI) tools.
Immune system assessment23 months after FPFVFollowing tests will be performed at baseline and each response assessment: * Lymphocyte subpopulations detection * Immunosuppressive factors measurements

Countries

Russia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026