Antishivering Effects
Conditions
Keywords
shivering spinal anesthesia
Brief summary
This prospective randomized double-blinded study was conducted to compare the antishivering effects of two different types of intrathecal administration.
Detailed description
This prospective randomized double-blinded study was conducted to compare the antishivering effects of two different types of intrathecal administration.Group Control:traditional intrathecal administration; Group Diluting:Diluting with cerebrospinal fluid
Interventions
PROCEDUREbupivacaine 0.5% 2.5 mL diluting with cerebrospinal fluid
Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 2.5 mL diluting with cerebrospinal fluid was administered intrathecally in 30 seconds
Sponsors
China Medical University, China
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ who were scheduled for elective surgery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with pre-operative fever (\>38℃), diabetes, , Parkinson's disease, hypo or hyperthyroidism, Raynaud's syndrome, obese patients (weight \>100 kg), patients shorter than 152 cm, those with a history of allergy to the study medications, and patients receiving vasodilators were excluded from the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| antishivering effects of two different types of spinal anesthesia | time point 1: 15 minuntes after spinal anesthesia and time point 2 : when patiets were sent to postoperation care unit | antishivering effects of two different types administration of spinal anesthesia |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed