Skip to content

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of an Oxalate Gel or Negative Control on Dentinal Hypersensitivity

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02189382
Enrollment
70
Registered
2014-07-14
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2018-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dentin Sensitivity

Keywords

Sensitivity

Brief summary

This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of a potassium oxalate desensitizer or negative control on dentinal hypersensitivity.

Interventions

OTHERWater

Sponsors

Procter and Gamble
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* be at least 18 years of age; * provide written informed consent prior to participation and be given a signed copy of the informed consent form; * complete a confidentiality disclosure agreement; * be in good general health as determined by the Investigator/designee; * agree not to participate in any other oral/dental product studies during the course of this study; * agree to delay any dentistry (including dental prophylaxis) until the study has been completed; * agree to refrain from the use of any non-study oral hygiene products; * agree to return for all scheduled visits and follow study procedures; and. * have at least one tooth with a Schiff sensitivity score of at least 1 in response to air challenge and a Yeaple Probe score of 10-40 in response to tactile challenge

Exclusion criteria

* self-reported pregnancy or nursing; * severe periodontal disease, as characterized by purulent exudate, generalized mobility, and/or severe recession; * active treatment of periodontitis; * fixed facial orthodontic appliances; * a history of kidney stones; * known allergies to the following ingredients; aqua, glycerin, cellulose gum, dipotassium oxalate, carbomer, sodium hydroxide, sodium benzoate, and potassium sorbate * any diseases or conditions that might interfere with the safe completion of the study; or * an inability to undergo any study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Air Challenge30 daysThe Schiff Sensitivity Scale was assessed for each test tooth via an evaporative air challenge. The examiner recorded the Schiff Index score corresponding to the response to the air challenge. The Schiff Index Sensitivity scale is scored as follows- 0: tooth/subject did not respond to stimulus, 1: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2: tooth/subject responds to stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves form stimulus, 3: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. The higher the Schiff score, the more sensitive the tooth. The mean change from Baseline was calculated for this measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold30 daysTactile Threshold was measured using a Yeaple probe. Testing was performed beginning at 10 g. The examiner recorded tactile scores for responding teeth. After treatment, testing began at 10 g and increase by 10 g to a maximum of 50 g. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. Each successive challenge increased until a yes response was repeated. If a second yes was not obtained, the force setting was increased to the next step and continued until a force was found which elicited two consecutive yes responses and was recorded as the threshold on the Tactile Sensitivity Score form. The mean change from Baseline was calculated for this measure.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Potassium Oxalate Gel
Self Applied Potassium Oxalate
35
Water
Self Applied Water
35
Total70

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWaterTotalPotassium Oxalate Gel
Age, Continuous36.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.25
35.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.74
34.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.13
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Asian Indian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Asian Oriental
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Black
10 Participants20 Participants10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Caucasian
14 Participants26 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Hispanic
6 Participants15 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity
Multi-Racial
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants42 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants28 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 350 / 35
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 350 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 350 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline Air Challenge

The Schiff Sensitivity Scale was assessed for each test tooth via an evaporative air challenge. The examiner recorded the Schiff Index score corresponding to the response to the air challenge. The Schiff Index Sensitivity scale is scored as follows- 0: tooth/subject did not respond to stimulus, 1: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2: tooth/subject responds to stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves form stimulus, 3: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. The higher the Schiff score, the more sensitive the tooth. The mean change from Baseline was calculated for this measure.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Potassium Oxalate GelChange From Baseline Air Challenge-1.200 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.677
WaterChange From Baseline Air Challenge-0.086 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.284
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold

Tactile Threshold was measured using a Yeaple probe. Testing was performed beginning at 10 g. The examiner recorded tactile scores for responding teeth. After treatment, testing began at 10 g and increase by 10 g to a maximum of 50 g. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. Each successive challenge increased until a yes response was repeated. If a second yes was not obtained, the force setting was increased to the next step and continued until a force was found which elicited two consecutive yes responses and was recorded as the threshold on the Tactile Sensitivity Score form. The mean change from Baseline was calculated for this measure.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Potassium Oxalate GelChange From Baseline in Tactile Threshold16.857 Grams (g)Standard Deviation 12.312
WaterChange From Baseline in Tactile Threshold0.286 Grams (g)Standard Deviation 2.956

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026