Skip to content

Contrast (Sonazoid)-Enhanced US as a Screening Tool for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhosis: An Exploratory Cross-sectional Study

Contrast (Sonazoid)-Enhanced US as a Screening Tool for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhosis: An Exploratory Cross-sectional Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02188901
Enrollment
523
Registered
2014-07-14
Start date
2014-10-15
Completion date
2016-08-03
Last updated
2018-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

Keywords

HCC, Sonazoid, Ultrasonography, Screening

Brief summary

B-mode ultrasonography (B-US), a standard method of surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), has a fair sensitivity of 63% in detecting early stage HCC. Sonazoid, a contrast agent for ultrasonography, has reported to have superior sensitivity in detecting focal liver lesion since it has ability of Kupffer phase imaging as well as vascular phase imaging. So our aim is to compare the detection rate of early stage HCC and false referral rate of HCC between B-mode US and Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography (S-US) within the same prospective data group. Our hypothesis is that S-US has superior detection rate of early stage HCC (5%) than that of B-mode US (3%).

Interventions

OTHERSonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography

Sonazoid (perflubutane) \[GE healthcare\]

Sponsors

GE Healthcare
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient 20 years old or older, 2. Patient at high risk of HCC and is supposed to take ultrasonography, 3. Patient who has no suspicious HCC on previous examinations or patient who undergoes the first surveillance, 4. Patient who has liver cirrhosis proven by one of the following methods-liver biopsy (METAVIR score 4), identification of esophageal or gastric varix by endoscopically or radiologically, surface nodularity on ultrasonography, CT or MRI, platelet count less than 100,000/mm3, serum albumin less than 3.5 g/dl, or prothrombin time higher than 1.3 INR, 5. Patient without contraindication for sonazoid, 6. Patient willing to sign the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient on pregnancy or breast feeding, 2. Patient with allergy to egg, 3. Patient with left-to-right shunt, respiratory insufficiency, or severe pulmonary hypertension, 4. Patient with history of HCC, 5. Patient with history of malignancy other than HCC -

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
False referral rate of HCC30±30 days after S-US if there is one or more suspicious HCC detected on S-US, or 180±30 days after S-US if there is no suspicious HCC detected on S-USFalse referral rate of HCC =
Detection rate of early stage HCC30±30 days after S-US if there is one or more suspicious HCC detected on S-US, or 180±30 days after S-US if there is no suspicious HCC detected on S-USDetection rate of early-stage HCC = (Number of confirmed early-stage HCC detected by a given modality) / (Total number of patients enrolled) x100

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026