Skip to content

Oral Iron Repletion Effects On Oxygen Uptake in Heart Failure

Oral Iron Repletion Effects On Oxygen Uptake in Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02188784
Acronym
IRONOUT
Enrollment
225
Registered
2014-07-14
Start date
2014-09-03
Completion date
2016-04-06
Last updated
2017-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Heart Failure

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if oral iron (Fe) polysaccharide is superior to oral placebo in improving functional capacity as measured by change in peak VO2 (oxygen uptake) by CPET (Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing) , of a broad population of patients with HFrEF (Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction) and Fe deficiency at 16 weeks. Hypothesis: In a broad population of HFrEF patients with Fe deficiency, compared to oral placebo, therapy with oral Fe polysaccharide will be associated with improvement in functional capacity at 16 weeks as assessed by CPET.

Detailed description

Therapeutic options to further improve functional capacity and symptoms in HF beyond neurohormonal antagonism are limited. Studies have demonstrated impaired oxidative capacity of skeletal muscle among HF patients, which may contribute to symptoms of breathlessness and persistent fatigue. In addition to its role in erythropoiesis, iron (Fe) plays a critical role in skeletal muscle's oxygen (O2)-storage capacity (myoglobin) and systemic aerobic energy production. As Fe deficiency is common in patients with symptomatic HF, repletion of iron stores may improve submaximal exercise capacity among these patients beyond the effects on erythropoiesis. While intravenous Fe repletion in HF patients with mild Fe-deficiency (i.e. Ferritin \<100 or Ferritin 100-299 with transferrin saturation \<20%) with or without anemia global well-being and functional status, oral Fe repletion has not been studied. Furthermore, the efficacy of oral Fe to replete iron stores in a similar population and its impact on functional capacity, measured objectively by peak VO2, remains unknown.

Interventions

DRUGPolysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mg

Oral Iron

DRUGPlacebo (for Polysaccharide Iron Complex)

Sugar capsule designed to mimic Polysaccharide Iron Complex.

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Adrian Hernandez
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age \>18 years 2. Previous clinical diagnosis of heart failure with current New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-IV symptoms LVEF≤0.40 within 2 years prior to consent, and ≥3 months after a major change in cardiac status (i.e. CABG or CRT). 3. Serum ferritin between 15-100 ng/ml or serum ferritin between 100-299 ng/ml with transferrin saturation \<20% 4. Hemoglobin 9.0-13.5 g/dL (males), 9-13.5 (females) at time of enrollment 5. Stable evidence-based medical therapy for HF (including beta-blocker and ACE-inhibitor/ARB unless previously deemed intolerant, and diuretics as necessary) with \</= 100% change in dose for 30 days prior to randomization a. Changes in diuretic dose guided by a patient-directed flexible dosing program are considered stable medical therapy 6. Willingness to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Presence of a neuromuscular, orthopedic or other non-cardiac condition that prevents the patient from exercise testing on a bicycle/treadmill ergometer and/or inability to achieve an RER ≥ 1.0 on screening/baseline CPET 2. Severe renal dysfunction (eGFR\< 20 ml/min/1.73m2) 3. Severe liver disease (ALT or AST \> 3x normal, alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin \>2x normal) 4. Gastrointestinal conditions known to impair Fe absorption (i.e. inflammatory bowel disease) 5. Known active infection as defined by current use of oral or intravenous antimicrobial agents 6. Documented active gastrointestinal bleeding 7. Active malignancy other than non-melanoma skin cancers 8. Anemia with known cause other than Fe deficiency or chronic disease 9. Fe overload disorders (i.e. hemochromatosis or hemosiderosis) 10. History of erythropoietin, IV or oral Fe therapy, or blood transfusion in previous 3 months. 11. Current ventricular assist device 12. Anticipated cardiac transplantation within the next 4 months 13. Primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, infiltrative cardiomyopathy, acute myocarditis, constrictive pericarditis or tamponade 14. Previous adverse reaction to study drug or other oral Fe preparation 15. Known or anticipated pregnancy in the next 4 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Peak VO2 (ml/Min) (VO2 =Oxygen Consumption)Baseline (BL) and Week 16To determine if oral Fe (Iron) polysaccharide is superior to oral placebo in improving functional capacity as measured by change in peak VO2 by CPET (Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing) , of a broad population of patients with HFrEF (Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction) and Fe deficiency at 16 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Sub-maximal Exercise Capacity as Assessed by the 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Measured at BL, week 8 and week 16To determine the impact of oral Fe repletion on Submaximal exercise capacity as measured by 6MWT
Change in Plasma NT-pro BNPMeasured at Baseline and Week 16To determine the impact of oral Fe repletion on Plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP)
Change in Health Status: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) - Clinical Summary ScoreMeasured at Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16To determine the impact of oral Fe repletion on Health Status: KCCQ. KCCQ is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life for patients with congestive heart failure. It is a predictive tool that tracks how patients are doing if they have weakened heart muscle due to prior heart attacks, heart valve problems, viral infections, or other causes. The KCCQs questions are used to calculate scores in ten domains. Physical Limitation, Symptom Stability, Frequency, Burden and Total Symptom. Social Limitation, Self-Efficacy, Quality of Life, and Clinical Summary. Overall summary: a combined measure of all the above. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Change From Baseline in O2 Uptake Kinetics as Assessed by Mean Response Time From CPETMeasured at BL week 16To determine the impact of oral Fe repletion on O2 Uptake Kinetics as measured by CPET
Change From Baseline in Ventilatory Efficiency Defined by Ve/VCO2Measured at BL week 16Change from baseline in Ventilatory Efficiency defined by Ve/VCO2 (carbon dioxide output) as measured by CPET

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mg
oral Fe polysaccharide 150mg twice daily for 16 weeks Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mg: Oral Iron
111
Placebo (for Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mg)
Oral placebo twice a day for 16 weeks Placebo (for Polysaccharide Iron Complex): Sugar capsule designed to mimic Polysaccharide Iron Complex.
114
Total225

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath31
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision23
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject39

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPolysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mgTotalPlacebo (for Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mg)
Age, Continuous61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
51.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants9 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
108 Participants215 Participants107 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
31 Participants57 Participants26 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
79 Participants164 Participants85 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
111 Participants225 Participants114 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
44 Participants80 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
67 Participants145 Participants78 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 11124 / 114
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 1119 / 114

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Peak VO2 (ml/Min) (VO2 =Oxygen Consumption)

To determine if oral Fe (Iron) polysaccharide is superior to oral placebo in improving functional capacity as measured by change in peak VO2 by CPET (Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing) , of a broad population of patients with HFrEF (Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction) and Fe deficiency at 16 weeks.

Time frame: Baseline (BL) and Week 16

Population: All randomized patients with available change data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mgChange in Peak VO2 (ml/Min) (VO2 =Oxygen Consumption)28.04 mL/minStandard Deviation 212.75
Placebo (for Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mg)Change in Peak VO2 (ml/Min) (VO2 =Oxygen Consumption)3.90 mL/minStandard Deviation 190.24
p-value: 0.45795% CI: [-34.38, 76.43]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline in O2 Uptake Kinetics as Assessed by Mean Response Time From CPET

To determine the impact of oral Fe repletion on O2 Uptake Kinetics as measured by CPET

Time frame: Measured at BL week 16

Population: All randomized patients with available change data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mgChange From Baseline in O2 Uptake Kinetics as Assessed by Mean Response Time From CPET2.63 secondsStandard Deviation 13.31
Placebo (for Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mg)Change From Baseline in O2 Uptake Kinetics as Assessed by Mean Response Time From CPET-0.95 secondsStandard Deviation 13.29
p-value: 0.064395% CI: [-0.21, 7.33]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Sub-maximal Exercise Capacity as Assessed by the 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

To determine the impact of oral Fe repletion on Submaximal exercise capacity as measured by 6MWT

Time frame: Measured at BL, week 8 and week 16

Population: All randomized patients with available change data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mgChange From Baseline in Sub-maximal Exercise Capacity as Assessed by the 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)8 weeks12.65 metersStandard Deviation 95.89
Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mgChange From Baseline in Sub-maximal Exercise Capacity as Assessed by the 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)16 weeks10.76 metersStandard Deviation 62.29
Placebo (for Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mg)Change From Baseline in Sub-maximal Exercise Capacity as Assessed by the 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)8 weeks16.63 metersStandard Deviation 83.2
Placebo (for Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mg)Change From Baseline in Sub-maximal Exercise Capacity as Assessed by the 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)16 weeks30.94 metersStandard Deviation 77.33
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 8p-value: 0.948795% CI: [-24.12, 22.59]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 16p-value: 0.192195% CI: [-31.71, 6.37]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ventilatory Efficiency Defined by Ve/VCO2

Change from baseline in Ventilatory Efficiency defined by Ve/VCO2 (carbon dioxide output) as measured by CPET

Time frame: Measured at BL week 16

Population: All randomized patients with available change data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mgChange From Baseline in Ventilatory Efficiency Defined by Ve/VCO2-0.48 VE/VCO2 SlopeStandard Deviation 5.85
Placebo (for Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mg)Change From Baseline in Ventilatory Efficiency Defined by Ve/VCO2-1.31 VE/VCO2 SlopeStandard Deviation 8.85
p-value: 0.400695% CI: [-1.04, 2.58]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Health Status: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) - Clinical Summary Score

To determine the impact of oral Fe repletion on Health Status: KCCQ. KCCQ is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life for patients with congestive heart failure. It is a predictive tool that tracks how patients are doing if they have weakened heart muscle due to prior heart attacks, heart valve problems, viral infections, or other causes. The KCCQs questions are used to calculate scores in ten domains. Physical Limitation, Symptom Stability, Frequency, Burden and Total Symptom. Social Limitation, Self-Efficacy, Quality of Life, and Clinical Summary. Overall summary: a combined measure of all the above. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.

Time frame: Measured at Baseline, Week 8 and Week 16

Population: All randomized patients with available change data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mgChange in Health Status: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) - Clinical Summary ScoreWeek 83.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.91
Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mgChange in Health Status: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) - Clinical Summary ScoreWeek 163.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.05
Placebo (for Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mg)Change in Health Status: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) - Clinical Summary ScoreWeek 80.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.63
Placebo (for Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mg)Change in Health Status: Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) - Clinical Summary ScoreWeek 164.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
Comparison: Change from baseline to week 8p-value: 0.072295% CI: [-0.33, 7.52]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Change from baseline to week 16p-value: 0.692795% CI: [-2.83, 4.24]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in Plasma NT-pro BNP

To determine the impact of oral Fe repletion on Plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP)

Time frame: Measured at Baseline and Week 16

Population: All randomized patients with available change data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mgChange in Plasma NT-pro BNP119.36 pg/mlStandard Deviation 1937.58
Placebo (for Polysaccharide Iron Complex 150 mg)Change in Plasma NT-pro BNP-70.88 pg/mlStandard Deviation 1256.49
p-value: 0.429695% CI: [-272.14, 637]Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026