Skip to content

Fixed Dose Intervention Trial of New England Enhancing Survival in SMI Patients

Fixed Dose Intervention Trial of New England Enhancing Survival in Serious Mental Illness Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02188121
Acronym
FITNESS
Enrollment
227
Registered
2014-07-11
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2021-10-31
Last updated
2023-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Disorder, Cardiovascular Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, Psychosis NOS, Schizoaffective Disorder, Schizophrenia, Serious Mental Illness

Brief summary

Patients with severe mental illness (SMI) die younger than persons in the general population. Much of the excess mortality for SMI patients is attributable to cardiovascular disease, and is exacerbated by treatment with second-generation antipsychotics (2GAs). Although the cardiovascular risks are well-known, and safe, efficacious therapy exists, few SMI patients receive cardiovascular prevention drugs. Care delivery fragmentation and poor patient adherence are central problems to reducing cardiovascular risks for patients with SMI. To address these problems, we propose to conduct a multi-site, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing an initial treatment strategy of free, fixed-doses of two generic, cardiovascular prevention drugs (statins and angiotensin drugs) delivered within mental health clinics versus usual treatment. The study will include adult patients (18+ years old) with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, or psychosis not otherwise specified (NOS) who have received 2GAs treatment within the past six months from within four mental health clinics in the Boston area. We have three aims: 1) to compare the proportions of subjects in each arm who are receiving cardiovascular drug treatment and are adherent to therapy during 12-months of follow-up; 2) to compare changes in composite (e.g., Framingham scores) and individual (e.g., lipid levels) cardiovascular risk factor levels using an intent-to-treat (ITT) approach; and 3) to compare risk factor levels, accounting for variation in adherence over time, using causal inference techniques to estimate the per-protocol effect of the intervention. Our three aims examine whether this low cost, streamlined treatment strategy increases the numbers of subjects receiving cardiovascular prevention therapy and improves cardiovascular risk levels. We will follow subjects for 12 months, and collect interview and biometric data at baseline and over the following 12 months. Subjects will have the option to continue for another 12 months, during which we will continue to collect interview and biometric data, but will not prescribe cardiovascular medications. This population-based initial treatment strategy could be an effective and efficient approach for overcoming traditional barriers to cardiovascular disease prevention within the SMI population. Findings from this study will inform efforts to improve care and outcomes, and to enhance survival for patients with severe mental illness.

Detailed description

By design, all subjects in the Intervention arm will start by being under treatment. During the course of follow-up, we expect that some will stay consistently on treatment, some will discontinue treatment (become non-adherent), while others will make transitions on and off treatment in various patterns. In contrast, by design, subjects in the Usual Treatment (control) arm do not start on treatment; however, some will initiate treatment as a result of usual clinical care, e.g., primary care physician initiation. At any point we will be comparing two binary outcomes (on or off treatment) and will use standard methods for comparing two proportions to test statistical significance and get confidence intervals for the difference in the percent on treatment in the two arms. Participants who are ineligible for randomization will be followed similarly to participants in the Usual Treatment Arm, in a third, non-randomized group, which will be excluded from the primary analysis.

Interventions

DRUGSimvastatin

3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors

DRUGLosartan

Angiotensin II receptor antagonist

Sponsors

Michael J. Gill Mental Health Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
Massachusetts Mental Health Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Dauten Family Center for Bipolar Treatment Innovation at Massachusetts General Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The Edinburg Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Mclean Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Incident or prevalent cases: schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, or psychosis NOS (chart diagnosis). * Age 18 years and older. * Recent treatment with a standing 2GA, e.g., receiving a standing 2GA in the past 6 months. * Concomitant psychotropic medications will be allowed. * Ongoing treatment of their mental illnesses at one of four study mental health clinics, defined as entering one of the two-year First Episode Clinic treatment programs as a de novo patient (new disease) or having been diagnosed \>2 years ago and had at least six visits in the past 12 months (prevalent disease).

Exclusion criteria

* • Unstable/active disease or potential contraindications with both study medications, e.g., diabetes, unstable angina or recent acute coronary syndrome, pregnancy, very high risk factors on the screening labs (e.g., A1c\>7%), renal failure, liver failure, or both statin and angiotension drug contraindications. * Unable to provide informed consent, e.g., has dementia, developmental disability, other cognitive disorder, or fails screening mini-mental status exam (subjects with guardians may participate with guardian consent) * Receiving active cardiovascular treatment, defined as receiving both a statin or ARB in the past three months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants on Adequate Cardiovascular Prevention Care (Defined as Taking a Statin and Angiotensin Medication)Baseline to 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Low Density Lipoprotein LevelsBaseline to 12 monthsSimilar to secondary outcome measure but focusing on Low Density Lipoprotein, Systolic Blood Pressure, and Hemoglobin A1c

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Systolic Blood PressureBaseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 monthsSimilar to secondary outcome measure but focusing on Systolic Blood Pressure
Change in Hemoglobin A1CBaseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 monthsSimilar to secondary outcome measure but focusing on Hemoglobin A1c
Change in Modified Framingham Score as a Summary Cardiovascular Risk LevelBaseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 monthsThe outcome here is the difference in summary risk level changes (e.g., modified Framingham score) between our two study groups, i.e., do intervention subjects experience differential changes in cardiovascular risk levels compared to control subjects. This outcome will be continuously measured (but not necessarily normally distributed).
Mean Percentage of Follow up Time During Which Each Group is on Adequate Cardiovascular Prevention CareBaseline to 12 months
Change in Percent on Adequate Cardiovascular Prevention CareBaseline to 3 months
Change in Number of Distinct Cardiovascular Prevention Drugs TakenBaseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 monthsSimilar to primary outcome measure, but here we count the number of distinct cardiovascular prevention drugs taken by the patient as a continuous measure to reflect potential for partial treatment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

23 participants were excluded after enrollment but prior to assignment to a study arm. The reasons for exclusion were vital signs or lab values outside of inclusion criteria, or emergence of details after enrollment that made participant ineligible.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Statin and/or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker
Simvastatin 20mg PO daily and/or Losartan 25mg PO daily Simvastatin: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors Losartan: Angiotensin II receptor antagonist
99
Usual Treatment
We will compare the initial treatment intervention with usual treatment (control arm), with both arms superimposed on a system of regular monitoring base. The investigators will make no effort to alter or influence treatment or use of that treatment for subjects in the control arm. Note that our goal in the Control arm is to characterize usual treatment. We will not intervene in this care except in emergencies. Some patients who need care for metabolic syndrome may not be receiving it - just as they would if not in our trial.
105
Total204

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStatin and/or Angiotensin Receptor BlockerTotalUsual Treatment
Age, Continuous36.0 years37.2 years38.3 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants15 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
85 Participants177 Participants92 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants12 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants34 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
8 Participants12 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
70 Participants145 Participants75 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
99 Participants204 Participants105 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants81 Participants46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
64 Participants123 Participants59 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 992 / 105
other
Total, other adverse events
72 / 9950 / 105
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 994 / 105

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants on Adequate Cardiovascular Prevention Care (Defined as Taking a Statin and Angiotensin Medication)

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Statin and/or Angiotensin Receptor BlockerNumber of Participants on Adequate Cardiovascular Prevention Care (Defined as Taking a Statin and Angiotensin Medication)66 Participants
Usual TreatmentNumber of Participants on Adequate Cardiovascular Prevention Care (Defined as Taking a Statin and Angiotensin Medication)8 Participants
Secondary

Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Levels

Similar to secondary outcome measure but focusing on Low Density Lipoprotein, Systolic Blood Pressure, and Hemoglobin A1c

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Statin and/or Angiotensin Receptor BlockerChange in Low Density Lipoprotein LevelsBaseline100 mg/dL
Statin and/or Angiotensin Receptor BlockerChange in Low Density Lipoprotein Levels12 months86 mg/dL
Usual TreatmentChange in Low Density Lipoprotein LevelsBaseline106 mg/dL
Usual TreatmentChange in Low Density Lipoprotein Levels12 months100 mg/dL
Other Pre-specified

Change in Hemoglobin A1C

Similar to secondary outcome measure but focusing on Hemoglobin A1c

Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Other Pre-specified

Change in Modified Framingham Score as a Summary Cardiovascular Risk Level

The outcome here is the difference in summary risk level changes (e.g., modified Framingham score) between our two study groups, i.e., do intervention subjects experience differential changes in cardiovascular risk levels compared to control subjects. This outcome will be continuously measured (but not necessarily normally distributed).

Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Other Pre-specified

Change in Number of Distinct Cardiovascular Prevention Drugs Taken

Similar to primary outcome measure, but here we count the number of distinct cardiovascular prevention drugs taken by the patient as a continuous measure to reflect potential for partial treatment.

Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Other Pre-specified

Change in Percent on Adequate Cardiovascular Prevention Care

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

Other Pre-specified

Change in Percent on Adequate Cardiovascular Prevention Care

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

Other Pre-specified

Change in Percent on Adequate Cardiovascular Prevention Care

Time frame: Baseline to 9 months

Other Pre-specified

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

Similar to secondary outcome measure but focusing on Systolic Blood Pressure

Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Other Pre-specified

Mean Percentage of Follow up Time During Which Each Group is on Adequate Cardiovascular Prevention Care

Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026