Skip to content

CONTRAST (Can cONTrast Injection Better Approximate FFR compAred to Pure reSTing Physiology?)

CONTRAST (Can cONTrast Injection Better Approximate FFR compAred to Pure reSTing Physiology?)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02184117
Acronym
CONTRAST
Enrollment
763
Registered
2014-07-09
Start date
2014-07-31
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2016-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial, Adenosine, Contrast Media

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic performances of iodine contrast medium and resting conditions to predict fractional flow reserve (FFR). Reference FFR will be measured using standard adenosine. We hypothesize that contrast FFR will offer superior diagnostic agreement compared to resting conditions.

Detailed description

We are conducting a diagnostic accuracy study. The reference standard is adenosine-derived FFR. The diagnostic tests undergoing evaluation are resting conditions and hyperemia induced by intracoronary injection of contrast medium. While all these tests give a continuous result, we will apply binary cutoffs for comparison to FFR≤0.8 as the reference standard. Subjects will be selected prospectively from consecutive patients undergoing FFR assessment for standard clinical indications. The paired comparative design means that each patient will undergo resting (baseline), post-contrast, and adenosine-derived measurements. To enhance test integrity, all pressure recordings will be analyzed in a central physiology core laboratory blinded to clinical data and recruiting site.

Interventions

DRUGAdenosine

Intracoronary or intravenous adenosine to induce hyperemia for reference FFR

DRUGContrast Media

Intracoronary injection of contrast medium to induce hyperemia for contrast FFR

Baseline measurement of aortic and coronary pressures

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years or older. * Undergoing FFR assessment for standard clinical indications. * Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). * Extremely tortuous or calcified coronary arteries precluding intracoronary physiologic measurements. Operators may exclude subtotal or similar high-grade lesions, which in their judgment may be threatened by pressure wire placement. * Known severe left ventricular hypertrophy (septal wall thickness at echocardiography of \>13 mm). * Inability to receive adenosine (for example, severe reactive airway disease, marked hypotension, or advanced atrioventricular block without pacemaker). * Recent (within 3 weeks prior to cardiac catheterization) ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in any arterial distribution (not specifically target lesion). * Culprit lesions (based on clinical judgment of the operator) for either STEMI or non-STEMI cannot be included. * Severe cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction \<30%). * Renal insufficiency such that an additional 12 to 20 mL of contrast would, in the opinion of the operator, pose unwarranted risk to the patient.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Agreement with binary FFR≤0.80BaselineTo quantify any improvement in binary agreement from resting conditions to contrast medium injection, using adenosine-derived FFR≤0.8 as the reference standard.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Binary diagnostic performanceBaselineTo describe the diagnostic performance of resting conditions and contrast medium injection using sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, compared to adenosine-derived FFR≤0.8 as the reference standard.
Continuous relationship with FFRBaselineTo determine the relationship between adenosine-derived FFR and either resting conditions or contrast medium injection using scatter plots (correlation coefficient) and Bland-Altman analysis (bias and limits of agreement).

Countries

Belgium, France, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, South Korea, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026