Skip to content

Efficacy of Macrolide and Glucocorticoid in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Comparison of Different Efficacy of Macrolide and Glucocorticoid in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02182492
Enrollment
187
Registered
2014-07-08
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2018-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Rhinosinusitis, Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Brief summary

Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is widely considered to be the gold standard in the surgical management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) that has failed maximal medical therapy. Nevertheless, the postoperation medical therapy was considered as a crucial procedure for the success of ESS. Both glucocorticoids and macrolide antibiotics have been recommended for the treatment of CRS, but their effect as postoperation medical therapies of ESS need more clinical data to clarify. The purpose of this prospective, randomized,study is to determine the effect of glucocorticoids and macrolide antibiotics for the postoperation medical therapy of ESS in different subtypes of CRS.

Detailed description

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a multifactorial inflammatory disorder that causes various symptoms including nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, olfactory dysfunction, facial pain, and headache . Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is usually recommended for patients who do not response well to conservative treatments. Although surgery is effective to alleviate symptoms and improve the quality of life of CRS patients, a followed long-term postoperative medical treatment is indispensable. Current European and American guidelines recommend glucocorticoids and antibiotics as the primary pharmacotherapeutic approaches for CRS before and after ESS. However, there are a number of CRS patients not responding well to glucocorticoid treatment and conflicting results exist regarding the efficacy of long-term, low-dose macrolide treatment. One potential reason is that CRS is a heterogeneous group of disorders unified by similar clinical presentations and its phenotypes and/or endotypes may be important factors determining the efficacy of treatments.

Interventions

DRUGClarithromycin

Clarithromycin 250 mg tablet once daily for 3 months

DRUGGlucocorticoid

Fluticasone propionate nasal spray 200 μg/d for 3 months

Sponsors

National Natural Science Foundation of China
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Zheng Liu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Meeting the CRS diagnostic criteria including CRSsNP and CRSwNP based on the EP3OS definition * Age ≥16 and ≤70 years * Chinese of either sex * Failure to conventional medical therapies according to EP3OS recommendation

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or breast-feeding women * Cystic fibrosis * Congenital ciliary dyskinesia * Sinonasal fungal disease * Systemic vasculitis * Granulomatous disease * Tumor * Immunodeficiency * Allergic to clarithromycin or topical corticosteroid * With an upper respiratory tract infection within 4 weeks of entering the study * With serious metabolic, cardiovascular, autoimmune, neurology, blood, digestive, cerebrovascular, respiratory system disease, or any disease interfering with the evaluation of results or affecting subjects' safety such as glaucoma and tuberculosis * With emotional or mental problems * Have received immunotherapy within the previous 3 months * Have had a history of local or systemic medications, such as glucocorticoids and macrolides within 4 weeks * Have had an acute asthmatic within the 4 weeks before entering the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Subjective Symptoms Visual Analog Scores (VAS)Scores will be recorded just before ESS and at 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up visit.The treatment will begin one week after ESS. Symptoms visual analog scores (VAS) were recorded just before ESS and at 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up visit. All of the patients were assessed by using symptom questionnaire after enrollment and at follow-up visits. Subjective symptoms were scored by patients on a VAS of 0-10, with 0 being no complaint whatsoever and 10 being the worst imaginable complaint.Five major symptoms were focused on: nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, loss of sense of smell, facial pain or pressure, and headache. Total VAS score was calculated based on the sum of VAS scores of these five symptom domains. Total subjective symptoms VAS range: 0\ 50, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Nasal Endoscopic ScoresScores will be recorded just before ESS and at 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up visit.Nasal endoscopic evaluation was performed by the senior investigator who remained blinded to the treatment, including poly size: 0, absence of polyps; 1, polyps in middle meatus only; 2, polyps beyond middle meatus but not blocking the nose completely; and 3, polyps completely obstructing the nose; discharge: 0, no discharge; 1, clear thin discharge; 2, thick purulent discharge; edema: 0, no edema; 1, mild edema; 2, severe edema; crusting: 0, no crusting; 1, mild crusting; 2, severe crusting; scarring: 0, no scarring; 1, mild scarring; 2, severe scarring). Each side was graded separately, and the scores from both sides were added to determine the overall scores for a particular domain. The total endoscopy score was calculated based on the sum of scores of these endoscopic domains. Endoscopic scores were also recorded before ESS (baseline) and at 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. Total endoscopy score range: 0\ 22, with higher scores indicating greater severity.

Other

MeasureTime frame
Measurement of Protein Levels of Inflammatory Molecules in TissuesPolyp tissues from CRSwNP patients and diseased sinus mucosa from CRSsNP patients will be collected during surgery.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Patients meeting the Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) diagnostic criteria outlined in the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal polyps (EP3OS) definition were enrolled. Three subtypes CRS included: CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP); non-eosinophilic CRS with nasal polyps (Non-Eos CRSwNP); eosinophilic CRS with nasal polyps (Eos CRSwNP).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Glucocorticoid
Fluticasone propionate nasal spray Glucocorticoid: Fluticasone propionate nasal spray 200 μg/d for 3 months
93
Clarithromycin
Clarithromycin tablet Clarithromycin: Clarithromycin 250 mg tablet once daily for 3 months
94
Total187

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicClarithromycinGlucocorticoidTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
86 Participants84 Participants170 Participants
Age, Continuous39.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
40.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
40.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
Region of Enrollment
China
94 participants93 participants187 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants38 Participants80 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
52 Participants55 Participants107 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 935 / 94
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 930 / 94

Outcome results

Primary

Total Subjective Symptoms Visual Analog Scores (VAS)

The treatment will begin one week after ESS. Symptoms visual analog scores (VAS) were recorded just before ESS and at 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up visit. All of the patients were assessed by using symptom questionnaire after enrollment and at follow-up visits. Subjective symptoms were scored by patients on a VAS of 0-10, with 0 being no complaint whatsoever and 10 being the worst imaginable complaint.Five major symptoms were focused on: nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, loss of sense of smell, facial pain or pressure, and headache. Total VAS score was calculated based on the sum of VAS scores of these five symptom domains. Total subjective symptoms VAS range: 0\ 50, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame: Scores will be recorded just before ESS and at 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up visit.

Population: A total of 187 patients met the study eligibility criteria. Seven patients in fluticasone propionate group and 8 patients in clarithromycin group dropped out because of nonadherence.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GlucocorticoidTotal Subjective Symptoms Visual Analog Scores (VAS)6-month5.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
GlucocorticoidTotal Subjective Symptoms Visual Analog Scores (VAS)Baseline20.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
GlucocorticoidTotal Subjective Symptoms Visual Analog Scores (VAS)1-month9.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
GlucocorticoidTotal Subjective Symptoms Visual Analog Scores (VAS)12-month5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
GlucocorticoidTotal Subjective Symptoms Visual Analog Scores (VAS)3-month7.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
ClarithromycinTotal Subjective Symptoms Visual Analog Scores (VAS)12-month4.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
ClarithromycinTotal Subjective Symptoms Visual Analog Scores (VAS)3-month5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
ClarithromycinTotal Subjective Symptoms Visual Analog Scores (VAS)6-month4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
ClarithromycinTotal Subjective Symptoms Visual Analog Scores (VAS)Baseline20.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
ClarithromycinTotal Subjective Symptoms Visual Analog Scores (VAS)1-month8.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Secondary

Total Nasal Endoscopic Scores

Nasal endoscopic evaluation was performed by the senior investigator who remained blinded to the treatment, including poly size: 0, absence of polyps; 1, polyps in middle meatus only; 2, polyps beyond middle meatus but not blocking the nose completely; and 3, polyps completely obstructing the nose; discharge: 0, no discharge; 1, clear thin discharge; 2, thick purulent discharge; edema: 0, no edema; 1, mild edema; 2, severe edema; crusting: 0, no crusting; 1, mild crusting; 2, severe crusting; scarring: 0, no scarring; 1, mild scarring; 2, severe scarring). Each side was graded separately, and the scores from both sides were added to determine the overall scores for a particular domain. The total endoscopy score was calculated based on the sum of scores of these endoscopic domains. Endoscopic scores were also recorded before ESS (baseline) and at 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. Total endoscopy score range: 0\ 22, with higher scores indicating greater severity.

Time frame: Scores will be recorded just before ESS and at 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up visit.

Population: A total of 187 patients met the study eligibility criteria. Seven patients in fluticasone propionate group and 8 patients in clarithromycin group dropped out because of nonadherence.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GlucocorticoidTotal Nasal Endoscopic Scores3-month3.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
GlucocorticoidTotal Nasal Endoscopic Scores6-month3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
GlucocorticoidTotal Nasal Endoscopic Scores1-month5.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
GlucocorticoidTotal Nasal Endoscopic Scores12-month2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
GlucocorticoidTotal Nasal Endoscopic ScoresBaseline8.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
ClarithromycinTotal Nasal Endoscopic Scores12-month2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
ClarithromycinTotal Nasal Endoscopic ScoresBaseline7.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
ClarithromycinTotal Nasal Endoscopic Scores1-month4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
ClarithromycinTotal Nasal Endoscopic Scores6-month2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
ClarithromycinTotal Nasal Endoscopic Scores3-month3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Other Pre-specified

Measurement of Protein Levels of Inflammatory Molecules in Tissues

Time frame: Polyp tissues from CRSwNP patients and diseased sinus mucosa from CRSsNP patients will be collected during surgery.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026