Skip to content

The Use of Paravertebral Block for Cardiac Surgery

Study of Paravertebral Block for Cardiac Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02180893
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-07-03
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2016-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mitral Valve Insufficiency

Brief summary

Pain after robotic cardiac surgery is a known problem and is often difficult to manage. Paravertebral nerve blocks are a proven method of pain relief following thoracotomy. A paravertebral block has been shown to provide good pain relief with minimal side effects, however, paravertebral blocks for robotic surgery have not been well studied. Currently the investigators routinely perform PVB on this patient population (of 50 MV robotic cases done between January and October 2012, 36 received paravertebral blocks with no adverse events noted). The investigators believe this should be studied further and that paravertebral blocks will reduce the amount of additional pain medication patients require in the first 24 hours after surgery, decrease intubation time and improve PACU and hospital discharge times.

Detailed description

Pain after robotic cardiac surgery is a known problem and is often difficult to manage. Paravertebral nerve blocks are a proven method of pain relief following thoracotomy. A paravertebral block has been shown to provide good pain relief with minimal side effects, however, paravertebral blocks for robotic surgery have not been well studied. Currently we routinely perform PVB on this patient population (of 50 MV robotic cases done between January and October 2012, 36 received paravertebral blocks with no adverse events noted). We believe this should be studied further and that paravertebral blocks will reduce the amount of additional pain medication patients require in the first 24 hours after surgery, decrease intubation time and improve PACU and hospital discharge times.

Interventions

OTHERParavertebral Block

Paravertebral nerve block injection

OTHERPlacebo Comparator

No block Patients who did not receive PVB

Sponsors

NYU Langone Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients over the age of 18 years of age undergoing robotic mitral valve surgery. * have capacity to understand and sign consent form

Exclusion criteria

* patients that are not candidates for paravertebral block as per ASRA guidelines (Horlocker, Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2010). In short, this includes patients taking specific anti platelet agents such as clopidigrel, anticoagulants such as heparin or low molecular weight heparin, or patients with an INR of greater than 1.5. -patients with a history of COPD or other respiratory diseases that would confound data on time to extubated will be excluded. * Patients that with a diagnosis of chronic pain, or patients currently taking narcotics are excluded, as this would confound data on postoperative narcotic requirements.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Fentanyl24 hours
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores24 hoursPossible scores range from 0-10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being highest level of pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participant Satisfaction48 hoursParticipants were asked whether or not they were satisfied with their postoperative pain control (yes or no)
Participant Satisfaction Score48 hoursParticipants were asked to score their satisfaction with their postoperative pain control on a scale of 0 (least satisfied) to 10 (most satisfied)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Paravertebral Block
Patient receiving a PVB prior to robotic mitral valce surgery Paravertebral Block: Paravertebral nerve block injection
30
No Block
Patients who did not receive PVB Placebo Comparator: No block Patients who did not receive PVB
30
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParavertebral BlockNo BlockTotal
Age, Continuous60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
62.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
61.15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.05
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants12 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants18 Participants43 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Postoperative Fentanyl

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paravertebral BlockPostoperative Fentanyl4.51 microgram/kilogramStandard Deviation 2.5
No BlockPostoperative Fentanyl6.14 microgram/kilogramStandard Deviation 2.88
Primary

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores

Possible scores range from 0-10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being highest level of pain

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paravertebral BlockVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores3.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
No BlockVisual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores4.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
Secondary

Participant Satisfaction

Participants were asked whether or not they were satisfied with their postoperative pain control (yes or no)

Time frame: 48 hours

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Paravertebral BlockParticipant Satisfaction100 percentage of yes responders
No BlockParticipant Satisfaction86.7 percentage of yes responders
Secondary

Participant Satisfaction Score

Participants were asked to score their satisfaction with their postoperative pain control on a scale of 0 (least satisfied) to 10 (most satisfied)

Time frame: 48 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paravertebral BlockParticipant Satisfaction Score8.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
No BlockParticipant Satisfaction Score6.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026