Skip to content

Effectiveness of Inelastic LSO Versus Standard Medical Treatment for Back Pain Associated With Kyphosis

A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study To Determine Clinical Effectiveness and Patient Wellness of Inelastic Lumbosacral Orthoses Versus Standard Medical Treatment in Patients With Back Pain AssociatEd With Kyphosis (The ARISE Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02180776
Acronym
ARISE
Enrollment
16
Registered
2014-07-03
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2014-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain, Kyphosis

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate clinical effectiveness and the effect on quality of life of an inelastic thoracolumbarasacral orthosis in male and female hyperkyphotic patients with moderate to severe back pain disability and to demonstrate the safety of the intervention through detailed reporting and analysis of adverse events.

Interventions

OTHERSummit 456 TLSO

Thoracolumbarsacral orthosis

Sponsors

Aspen Medical Products
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with moderate to complete disability (crippled) as defined by a score of 21% to 80% on the baseline evaluation of the Oswestry Back Pain Disability Questionnaire; * Patients diagnosed with kyphosis and have a Cobb angle of at least 55 degrees; * Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients under the age of 19; * Pregnant patients or patients who are considering future pregnancies; * Patients who were participating in any other investigational device or drug study or whose participation in a previous investigational study within 30 days of study entry may, in the opinion of the clinical investigator, impact analysis of this orthotic; * Patients who, in the clinical judgment of the investigator, are not suitable for this study; Patients who, in the investigators opinion, are mentally or legally incapacitated preventing informed consent or unable to read or understand written material; * Patients who are unable or unwilling to return to the study center for follow-up visits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean difference in the Oswestry Disability Index Scores of the intervention versus control groups4 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Measured amount of opioid medication consumed in the intervention group versus control groupBaseline and weeks 2,3,4,8,12,16,20 and 24

Other

MeasureTime frame
ODI scores between the intervention group versus control groupWeeks 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
SF-26v2 Survey scores in the intervention versus the control groupBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24.
Cost and return on investment of the LSO intervention24 weeks
Number of adverse events associated with the LSO interventionBaseline and weeks 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026