Skip to content

Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of MK-5592 (Posaconazole) in Japanese Participants With Fungal Infection (MK-5592-101)

A Randomized, Comparative, Open-label Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of MK-5592 Compared With Voriconazole in Japanese Subjects With Deep-seated Fungal Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02180165
Enrollment
116
Registered
2014-07-02
Start date
2014-07-29
Completion date
2018-01-24
Last updated
2021-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aspergillosis

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess and compare the safety of posaconazole with voriconazole in Japanese participants with aspergillosis.

Interventions

DRUGPosaconazole

300 mg posaconazole twice on Day 1, either by oral tablet or IV solution; followed by 300 mg once daily for up to 84 days

DRUGVoriconazole

300 mg voriconazole oral tablet (or 6 mg/kg IV solution) twice on Day 1, followed by 200 mg oral tablet (or 4 mg/kg IV solution) twice daily for up to 84 days

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Body weight \>=45 kg * Can be treated by taking tablet orally or intravenous (IV) formulation via central vein * Female has a negative pregnancy test * Female of non-childbearing potential; or if of childbearing potential, agrees to use proper combination of barrier method of birth control * Met screening criteria for either Invasive aspergillosis, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, zygomycosis or fusariosis.

Exclusion criteria

* Has a fungal infection other than Aspergillus any species (spp.) Zygomycetes (including Mucor spp.) and Fusarium spp. infection * Has allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, allergic sinusitis of aspergillosis, or aspergillosis of the eye * Has long-term inactive aspergilloma not expected to respond to investigational product * Is not expected to survive study duration * Has an underlying disease, complication and systemic condition which makes it difficult to evaluate effect of study drug * Has received, or continues to receive any systemic antifungal therapy, and cannot discontinue this treatment; but if fungal infection does not improve, can switch to study drug * Is expected to need prohibited medications * Has received posaconazole, has received voriconazole for this infection in the past and has deep-seated fungal infection that has not responded to this treatment, has intolerance for azole antifungal treatments, or is receiving antifungal combination therapy for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis * Has known hypersensitivity to any medication * Has history of either Torsade de Pointes, myocardial infarction within previous 90 days, has congenital or acquired long QT interval syndrome, or unstable cardiac arrhythmia * Has significant liver dysfunction * Has liver cirrhosis or cholestasis * Has renal insufficiency * Has a known hereditary problem of either galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency, or glucose-galactose malabsorption * Has acute symptomatic pancreatitis within 6 months of study entry or chronic pancreatitis * Has an active skin lesion consistent with squamous cell carcinoma or melanoma, or within prior 5 years a history of malignant melanoma * Has known or suspected Gilbert's disease * Female is pregnant, or nursing, or intends to become pregnant within 14 days after end of study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With an Adverse EventUp to approximately Day 98An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 42Day 42Successful treatment (or successful overall response) is defined as complete response and partial response to treatment assessed by the clinical adjudication committee (CAC). The 95% confidence interval (CI) is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 84Day 84Successful treatment (or successful overall response) is defined as complete response and partial response to treatment assessed by CAC. The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 84Day 84Successful treatment (or successful overall response) is defined as favorable response to treatment assessed by CAC. The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis and Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at End of Trial (Day 84)Day 84Successful treatment (or successful overall response) for invasive aspergillosis is defined as complete response and partial response to treatment assessed by CAC. Successful treatment (or successful overall response) for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis is defined as favorable response to treatment.The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Zygomycosis in Cohort 2 at Day 42Day 42Zygomycosis is an infection caused by zygomycete fungi. Successful treatment (or successful overall response) is defined as complete response and partial response to treatment assessed by CAC. The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Zygomycosis in Cohort 2 at Day 84Day 84Zygomycosis is an infection caused by zygomycete fungi. Successful treatment (or successful overall response) is defined as complete response and partial response to treatment assessed by CAC. The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 42 as Assessed by the Clinical InvestigatorDay 42Successful treatment (or successful overall response) for invasive aspergillosis is defined as complete response and partial response to treatment assessed by the clinical investigator.The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 84 as Assessed by the Clinical InvestigatorDay 84Successful treatment (or successful overall response) for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis is defined as favorable response to treatment assessed by the clinical investigator.The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Percentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 42Day 42A clinical response of resolution is defined as resolution of attributable signs and symptoms of disease, and a clinical response of improvement is defined as improvement of attributable signs and symptoms of disease as assessed by the CAC.
Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 42Day 42Successful treatment (or successful overall response) is defined as favorable response to treatment assessed by CAC. The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Percentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 42Day 42A radiological response of resolution is defined as resolution of radiological lesions, and a radiological response of improvement is defined as major reduction in size of radiological lesions as assessed by the CAC.
Percentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 84Day 84A radiological response of resolution is defined as resolution of radiological lesions, and a radiological response of improvement is defined as major reduction in size of radiological lesions as assessed by the CAC.
Percentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Mycological Response of Eradication in Cohort 2 at Day 42Day 42A mycological response of eradication is defined as fungus detected from culture or microscopy at the screening is eradicated at the time of evaluation (including presumed eradication), as assessed by the CAC.
Percentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution in Cohort 2 at Day 42Day 42A clinical response of resolution is defined as resolution of attributable signs and symptoms of disease, as assessed by the CAC.
Percentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution in Cohort 2 at Day 84Day 84A clinical response of resolution is defined as resolution of attributable signs and symptoms of disease, as assessed by the CAC.
Percentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution in Cohort 2 at Day 42Day 42A radiological response of resolution is defined as resolution of radiological lesions, as assessed by the CAC.
Percentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Mycological Response of Eradication in Cohort 2 at Day 42Day 42A mycological response of eradication is defined as fungus detected from culture or microscopy at the screening is eradicated at the time of evaluation (including presumed eradication), as assessed by the CAC.
Percentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Mycological Response of Eradication in Cohort 2 at Day 84Day 84A mycological response of eradication is defined as fungus detected from culture or microscopy at the screening is eradicated at the time of evaluation (including presumed eradication), as assessed by the CAC.
Percentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 84Day 84A clinical response of resolution is defined as resolution of attributable signs and symptoms of disease, and a clinical response of improvement is defined as improvement of attributable signs and symptoms of disease as assessed by the CAC.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted in male and female Japanese participants with deep-seated fungal infection.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1: Posaconazole
Participants with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis received 300 mg posaconazole oral tablet (or 300 mg intravenous (IV) solution) twice on Day 1, followed by 300 mg oral tablet or IV solution once daily for up to 84 days
15
Cohort 1: Voriconazole
Participants with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis received 300 mg voriconazole oral tablet (or 6 mg/kg IV solution) twice on Day 1, followed by 200 mg oral tablet (or 4 mg/kg IV solution) twice daily for up to 84 days
7
Cohort 2: Posaconazole
Participants from cohort 2 with invasive aspergillosis and chronic pulmonary aspergillosis received 300 mg posaconazole oral tablet (or 300 mg IV solution) twice on Day 1, followed by 300 mg oral tablet or IV solution once daily for up to 84 days
57
Cohort 2: Voriconazole
Participants from cohort 2 with invasive aspergillosis and chronic pulmonary aspergillosis received 300 mg voriconazole oral tablet (or 6 mg/kg IV solution) twice on Day 1, followed by 200 mg oral tablet (or 4 mg/kg IV solution) twice daily for up to 84 days
27
Total106

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event70183
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy0132
Overall StudyNot Treated0010
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1050
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3021

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1: PosaconazoleTotalCohort 2: VoriconazoleCohort 2: PosaconazoleCohort 1: Voriconazole
Age, Continuous64.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
63.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
58.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
65.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
69.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
15 Participants106 Participants27 Participants57 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants11 Participants2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants95 Participants25 Participants54 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 151 / 76 / 620 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 156 / 758 / 6231 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 152 / 728 / 623 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With an Adverse Event

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE.

Time frame: Up to approximately Day 98

Population: Cohort 1: All randomized participants with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis who received at least one dose of study treatment. Cohort 2: All randomized participants with invasive aspergillosis and chronic pulmonary aspergillosis who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: PosaconazoleNumber of Participants With an Adverse Event15 Participants
Cohort 1: VoriconazoleNumber of Participants With an Adverse Event6 Participants
Cohort 2: PosaconazoleNumber of Participants With an Adverse Event57 Participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazoleNumber of Participants With an Adverse Event27 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution in Cohort 2 at Day 42

A clinical response of resolution is defined as resolution of attributable signs and symptoms of disease, as assessed by the CAC.

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution in Cohort 2 at Day 4243.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution in Cohort 2 at Day 4273.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution in Cohort 2 at Day 84

A clinical response of resolution is defined as resolution of attributable signs and symptoms of disease, as assessed by the CAC.

Time frame: Day 84

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution in Cohort 2 at Day 8445.8 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution in Cohort 2 at Day 8482.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Mycological Response of Eradication in Cohort 2 at Day 42

A mycological response of eradication is defined as fungus detected from culture or microscopy at the screening is eradicated at the time of evaluation (including presumed eradication), as assessed by the CAC.

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Mycological Response of Eradication in Cohort 2 at Day 4233.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Mycological Response of Eradication in Cohort 2 at Day 4221.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Mycological Response of Eradication in Cohort 2 at Day 84

A mycological response of eradication is defined as fungus detected from culture or microscopy at the screening is eradicated at the time of evaluation (including presumed eradication), as assessed by the CAC.

Time frame: Day 84

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Mycological Response of Eradication in Cohort 2 at Day 8435.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Mycological Response of Eradication in Cohort 2 at Day 8421.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution in Cohort 2 at Day 42

A radiological response of resolution is defined as resolution of radiological lesions, as assessed by the CAC.

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution in Cohort 2 at Day 4258.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution in Cohort 2 at Day 4287.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 42

A clinical response of resolution is defined as resolution of attributable signs and symptoms of disease, and a clinical response of improvement is defined as improvement of attributable signs and symptoms of disease as assessed by the CAC.

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 42Resolution60.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 42Improvement20.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 42Resolution0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 42Improvement66.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 84

A clinical response of resolution is defined as resolution of attributable signs and symptoms of disease, and a clinical response of improvement is defined as improvement of attributable signs and symptoms of disease as assessed by the CAC.

Time frame: Day 84

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 84Resolution60.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 84Improvement20.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 84Resolution33.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Clinical Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 84Improvement33.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Mycological Response of Eradication in Cohort 2 at Day 42

A mycological response of eradication is defined as fungus detected from culture or microscopy at the screening is eradicated at the time of evaluation (including presumed eradication), as assessed by the CAC.

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Mycological Response of Eradication in Cohort 2 at Day 4220.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Mycological Response of Eradication in Cohort 2 at Day 420 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 42

A radiological response of resolution is defined as resolution of radiological lesions, and a radiological response of improvement is defined as major reduction in size of radiological lesions as assessed by the CAC.

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 42Resolution0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 42Improvement40.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 42Resolution0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 42Improvement100 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 84

A radiological response of resolution is defined as resolution of radiological lesions, and a radiological response of improvement is defined as major reduction in size of radiological lesions as assessed by the CAC.

Time frame: Day 84

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 84Resolution0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 84Improvement60.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 84Resolution0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Invasive Aspergillosis With Radiological Response of Resolution or Improvement in Cohort 2 at Day 84Improvement100 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 42

Successful treatment (or successful overall response) is defined as favorable response to treatment assessed by CAC. The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 4256.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 4287.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 84

Successful treatment (or successful overall response) is defined as favorable response to treatment assessed by CAC. The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: Day 84

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 8458.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 8487.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 84 as Assessed by the Clinical Investigator

Successful treatment (or successful overall response) for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis is defined as favorable response to treatment assessed by the clinical investigator.The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: Day 84

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 84 as Assessed by the Clinical Investigator60.4 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 84 as Assessed by the Clinical Investigator78.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis and Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at End of Trial (Day 84)

Successful treatment (or successful overall response) for invasive aspergillosis is defined as complete response and partial response to treatment assessed by CAC. Successful treatment (or successful overall response) for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis is defined as favorable response to treatment.The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: Day 84

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis or chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis and Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at End of Trial (Day 84)58.5 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis and Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at End of Trial (Day 84)88.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 42

Successful treatment (or successful overall response) is defined as complete response and partial response to treatment assessed by the clinical adjudication committee (CAC). The 95% confidence interval (CI) is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 4240.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 42100 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 42 as Assessed by the Clinical Investigator

Successful treatment (or successful overall response) for invasive aspergillosis is defined as complete response and partial response to treatment assessed by the clinical investigator.The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 42 as Assessed by the Clinical Investigator80.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 42 as Assessed by the Clinical Investigator66.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 84

Successful treatment (or successful overall response) is defined as complete response and partial response to treatment assessed by CAC. The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: Day 84

Population: Participants in cohort 2 diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1 were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 8460.0 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2: VoriconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Invasive Aspergillosis in Cohort 2 at Day 84100 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Zygomycosis in Cohort 2 at Day 42

Zygomycosis is an infection caused by zygomycete fungi. Successful treatment (or successful overall response) is defined as complete response and partial response to treatment assessed by CAC. The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: Day 42

Population: Participants in cohort 2, posaconazole treatment only, diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable zygomycosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1, and cohort 2 voriconazole treatment were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Zygomycosis in Cohort 2 at Day 4266.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Zygomycosis in Cohort 2 at Day 84

Zygomycosis is an infection caused by zygomycete fungi. Successful treatment (or successful overall response) is defined as complete response and partial response to treatment assessed by CAC. The 95% CI is based on the Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: Day 84

Population: Participants in cohort 2, posaconazole treatment only, diagnosed by CAC with proven or probable zygomycosis; who received at least one dose of study treatment; and had a baseline observation for the analysis endpoint. Participants in cohort 1, and cohort 2 voriconazole treatment were not analyzed for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 2: PosaconazolePercentage of Participants With Successful Overall Response for Zygomycosis in Cohort 2 at Day 84100 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026