Depression
Conditions
Brief summary
Major depression is a highly prevalent, frequently debilitating illness that too often fails to respond to currently available treatments such as antidepressant medication. Furthermore, randomized controlled trials of antidepressants consistently demonstrate large placebo effects. The investigators hypothesize that individual differences in the function of key brain circuits underlie the observed variability in clinical responses to both placebo and antidepressant medication. This study will test this hypothesis by recruiting treatment-seeking volunteers with major depression, with or without comorbid nicotine dependence. Volunteers will participate in positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans in the context of a treatment trial in which they will receive both placebo and antidepressant medication. A major goal of the study is to improve prediction of individual clinical responses in future treatment trials in which brain imaging may be unavailable, and to study the mechanisms of antidepressant response in Major Depression.
Detailed description
We performed a single-blinded two-week cross-over randomized controlled trial of two identical oral placebos (described as having either potentially active fast-acting antidepressant-like effects or to be inactive) followed by a 10-week open-label treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or in some cases, another agent as clinically indicated. The volunteers were studied with PET and the µ-opioid receptor selective radiotracer \[11C\]carfentanil after each 1-week inactive and active oral placebo treatment. In addition, 1 mL of isotonic saline was administered intravenously (i.v.) within sight of the volunteer during PET scanning every 4 min over 20 min only after the 1-week active placebo treatment, with instructions that the compound may be associated with the activation of brain systems involved in mood improvement. This challenge stimulus was utilized to test the individual capacity to acutely activate endogenous opioid neurotransmission under expectations of antidepressant effect.
Interventions
White tablets
Open label s-citalopram, 20 mg start up dose, increasing to 40 mg as clinically indicated; If prior non-response to this medication is noted by the patient, alternative treatments may include another first-line antidepressant:fluoxetine 20 mg; paroxetine up to 60 mg; sertraline up to 200 mg; bupropion up to 300 mg
Blue Capsule
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria will include: * Participants diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder and will include Hamilton Depressive Rating Scale (HDRS) scores \>15
Exclusion criteria
* Comorbid conditions that are medical, neurological or psychiatric, pregnancy, use of hormones (including birth control) or use of psychotropic agents * We will only permit certain past anxiety disorder diagnoses, including generalized anxiety, panic, agoraphobia, social phobia * We also will exclude left-handed individuals and patients who have used any centrally acting medications or recreational drugs with the past 2 months * No history of an implant, pacemaker or pacemaker wires, open heart surgery, artificial heart valve, brain aneurysm surgery, middle ear implant, hearing aid, braces or extensive dental work, cataract surgery or lens implant, implanted mechanical or electrical device, or artificial limb or joint * No metallic object in their body (such as braces) or have a history of foreign metallic object in the body such as bullets, BB's, pellets, shrapnel, or other metal fragments
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding Potential During PET | (90 minute PET scans) assessed at Weeks 1 and 2 | Binding Potential = Bmax/Kd (receptor concentration/affinity). This is the most common measure of in vivo receptor binding with positron emission tomography. Whole brain changes in mu-opioid receptors binding potential during PET from the Inactive to the Active placebo condition. Positive numbers presented here represent reductions in binding potential from the inactive to the active condition. |
| Changes in BOLD Response During Reward fMRI Task (Monetary Incentive Delay, MID) | (90 minute fMRI scans) assessed at Weeks 1 and 2 | % BOLD signal changes in the nucleus accumbens from the Inactive to the Active Placebo condition. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes From Baseline in PHQ-9 Depression Scores. | From Pre to post- active placebo, and from pre to post- inactive placebo (1 week intervention) | The Patient Health Questionnaire-9, is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression, based on participant answers. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represents mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression, respectively. The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 27. The PHQ-9 and QIDS were used to assess changes in mood during the placebo intervention (first 2 weeks), and therefore results are described as changes from the inactive to the active condition. |
| Changes in Dopamine (D 2/3) Binding Potential During PET. | (90 minute PET scan) assessed at Weeks 1 and 2 | Binding Potential= Bmax/Kd (receptor concentration/affinity). This is the most common measure of in vivo receptor binding with PET. Striatal changes in D2/3 receptor binding potential during PET from the Inactive to the Active condition. Positive numbers presented here represented reductions in binding potential from the inactive to the active condition. |
| Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale | Screening, week 0, week 2, week 4, week 8 and week 10 | Designed in 1979 by researchers as an adjunct to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) which would be more sensitive to the changes brought on by antidepressants and other forms of treatment than the Hamilton Scale. MADRS was used to assess symptoms during the open label antidepressant treatment phase, so results are described as mean scores at each bi-weekly visit. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60 where 0 is no depression and 60 is most extreme depression. The questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms 1. Apparent sadness 2. Reported sadness 3. Inner tension 4. Reduced sleep 5. Reduced appetite 6. Concentration difficulties 7. Lassitude 8. Inability to feel 9. Pessimistic thoughts 10. Suicidal thoughts Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6 - normal\[5\] /symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression \>34 - severe depression |
| Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores | Screening, week 0, week 2, week 4, week 8 and week 10 | The total score is obtained by summing the score of each item, 0-4 (symptom is absent, mild, moderate, or severe) or 0-2 (absent, slight or trivial, clearly present). For the 17-item version, scores can range from 0 to 54, with 0 meaning no depression, and 54, severe depression. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was used to assess symptoms during the open label antidepressant treatment phase, so results are described as mean scores at each bi-weekly visit. |
| Changes From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR-16) Score | From Pre to post- active placebo, and from pre to post- inactive placebo (1 week intervention) | This scale is a self-report measure of depression with 16 items. Questions in the QIDS - SR-116 correlate with the nine DSM-IV symptom criterion domains, Including: Sleep disturbance (initial, middle, and late insomnia or hypersomnia) (Q 1 - 4), Sad mood (Q 5), Decrease/increase in appetite/weight (Q 6 - 9), Concentration (Q 10), Self-criticism (Q 11), Suicidal ideation (Q 12), Interest (Q 13), Energy/fatigue (Q 14), Psychomotor agitation/retardation (Q 15 - 16). Severity of depression can be judged based on the total score: 1-5= No depression; 6-10= Mild depression; 11-15= Moderate depression; 16-20= Severe depression; 21-27= Very severe depression. The PHQ-9 and QIDS were used to assess changes in mood during the placebo intervention (first 2 weeks), and therefore results are described as changes from the inactive to the active condition. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
4 consented volunteers dropped because of exclusion criteria
Pre-assignment details
Of 44 participants consented, 4 were not assigned to participate due to screen failures.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Total Study Population | 40 |
| Total | 40 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total Study Population |
|---|---|
| Age, Customized 19 to 59 years | 40 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 40 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 25 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 15 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
Outcome results
Changes in BOLD Response During Reward fMRI Task (Monetary Incentive Delay, MID)
% BOLD signal changes in the nucleus accumbens from the Inactive to the Active Placebo condition.
Time frame: (90 minute fMRI scans) assessed at Weeks 1 and 2
Population: Data was missing in 11 subjects due to movement artifacts, or incidental findings that made the data not usable.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Changes in BOLD Response During Reward fMRI Task (Monetary Incentive Delay, MID) | 0.04 % BOLD changes from Inactive to Active | Standard Deviation 1.13 |
Changes in Mu-opioid Binding Potential During PET
Binding Potential = Bmax/Kd (receptor concentration/affinity). This is the most common measure of in vivo receptor binding with positron emission tomography. Whole brain changes in mu-opioid receptors binding potential during PET from the Inactive to the Active placebo condition. Positive numbers presented here represent reductions in binding potential from the inactive to the active condition.
Time frame: (90 minute PET scans) assessed at Weeks 1 and 2
Population: Data in four subjects was missing due to failure in the synthesis of the radio tracer for at least one of the two scans.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Changes in Mu-opioid Binding Potential During PET | 0.12 Binding potential ratio | Standard Deviation 0.32 |
Changes From Baseline in PHQ-9 Depression Scores.
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9, is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression, based on participant answers. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represents mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression, respectively. The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 27. The PHQ-9 and QIDS were used to assess changes in mood during the placebo intervention (first 2 weeks), and therefore results are described as changes from the inactive to the active condition.
Time frame: From Pre to post- active placebo, and from pre to post- inactive placebo (1 week intervention)
Population: Changes in PHQ-9 score from the beginning of the active/inactive placebo and the end of active/inactive PET scan.~Approximately 1-2 weeks between the two conditions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Changes From Baseline in PHQ-9 Depression Scores. | 1.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| Inactive Placebo | Changes From Baseline in PHQ-9 Depression Scores. | 0.96 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.9 |
Changes From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR-16) Score
This scale is a self-report measure of depression with 16 items. Questions in the QIDS - SR-116 correlate with the nine DSM-IV symptom criterion domains, Including: Sleep disturbance (initial, middle, and late insomnia or hypersomnia) (Q 1 - 4), Sad mood (Q 5), Decrease/increase in appetite/weight (Q 6 - 9), Concentration (Q 10), Self-criticism (Q 11), Suicidal ideation (Q 12), Interest (Q 13), Energy/fatigue (Q 14), Psychomotor agitation/retardation (Q 15 - 16). Severity of depression can be judged based on the total score: 1-5= No depression; 6-10= Mild depression; 11-15= Moderate depression; 16-20= Severe depression; 21-27= Very severe depression. The PHQ-9 and QIDS were used to assess changes in mood during the placebo intervention (first 2 weeks), and therefore results are described as changes from the inactive to the active condition.
Time frame: From Pre to post- active placebo, and from pre to post- inactive placebo (1 week intervention)
Population: Changes in QIDS-16SR from screening active/inactive placebo condition to the post scan active/inactive placebo condition.~Approximately 1-2 weeks between the two conditions.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Changes From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR-16) Score | 1.7 Units on a scale | Standard Error 3.3 |
| Inactive Placebo | Changes From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR-16) Score | -0.5 Units on a scale | Standard Error 3.2 |
Changes in Dopamine (D 2/3) Binding Potential During PET.
Binding Potential= Bmax/Kd (receptor concentration/affinity). This is the most common measure of in vivo receptor binding with PET. Striatal changes in D2/3 receptor binding potential during PET from the Inactive to the Active condition. Positive numbers presented here represented reductions in binding potential from the inactive to the active condition.
Time frame: (90 minute PET scan) assessed at Weeks 1 and 2
Population: Data was only collected in 26 subjects as proposed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Changes in Dopamine (D 2/3) Binding Potential During PET. | 0.08 Binding potential ratio | Standard Deviation 0.15 |
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores
The total score is obtained by summing the score of each item, 0-4 (symptom is absent, mild, moderate, or severe) or 0-2 (absent, slight or trivial, clearly present). For the 17-item version, scores can range from 0 to 54, with 0 meaning no depression, and 54, severe depression. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was used to assess symptoms during the open label antidepressant treatment phase, so results are described as mean scores at each bi-weekly visit.
Time frame: Screening, week 0, week 2, week 4, week 8 and week 10
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores | Screening | 21 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores | week 0 | 17.2 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.5 |
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores | week 2 | 13.3 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.18 |
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores | Week 4 | 11 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.73 |
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores | week 8 | 8.65 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.78 |
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores | week 10 | 5.3 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.75 |
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
Designed in 1979 by researchers as an adjunct to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) which would be more sensitive to the changes brought on by antidepressants and other forms of treatment than the Hamilton Scale. MADRS was used to assess symptoms during the open label antidepressant treatment phase, so results are described as mean scores at each bi-weekly visit. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60 where 0 is no depression and 60 is most extreme depression. The questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms 1. Apparent sadness 2. Reported sadness 3. Inner tension 4. Reduced sleep 5. Reduced appetite 6. Concentration difficulties 7. Lassitude 8. Inability to feel 9. Pessimistic thoughts 10. Suicidal thoughts Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6 - normal\[5\] /symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression \>34 - severe depression
Time frame: Screening, week 0, week 2, week 4, week 8 and week 10
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale | week 2 | 15 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7 |
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale | Baseline | 27 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale | week 0 | 22 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.4 |
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale | week 4 | 13 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10 |
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale | week 8 | 11 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.7 |
| Changes in Mu-opioid Binding (Inactive -Active Placebo) | Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale | week 10 | 7.7 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.36 |