Refractive Errors
Conditions
Keywords
cycloplegia, refraction in children, cycloplegic agents, cycloplegic schemes, cyclopentolate
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether tropicamide + phenylephrine cyclopentolate + applied for once waiting 30 minutes to retinoscopy (new scheme) is not inferior to apply cyclopentolate alone and wait 45 minutes to retinoscopy (traditional scheme)
Interventions
Traditional scheme. Cyclopentolate, repeat dosage 5 minutes and then wait 40 minutes to retinoscopy. Total wait 45 minutes.
New scheme. All drugs together and wait 30 minutes for retinoscopy
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Children between 1 and 10 years
Exclusion criteria
* Strabismus * Ocular surgery * Another ocular disease than ametropias (i.e uveitis, cataract) * Cardiovascular or neurologic disease. * Allergy to any of drugs used in the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Spherical equivalent | average 18 days | In the first and second visit the spherical equivalent will be measured with retinoscopy. Change in spherical equivalent refraction from first visit to day average 18 days (second visit). On both visits the patient will receive different cyclopegia schemes. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in spherical refraction | average 18 days | Change in spherical refraction between visit 1 and 2. |
| Change in cylindrical refraction | average 18 days | Change in cylindrical refraction between visit 1 and 2 |
| iris motility | average 18 days | both schemes are effective in cycloplegia ? In visit 1 and 2 the iris motility after the cyclopegic schemes will be evaluated |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| crying with the application | average 18 days | does the child cry with both schemes? |
| eyes color and cycloplegia | average 18 days | there is a difference between the effectiveness of the schemes according to eye color? |
Countries
Chile