Iron Absorption and Utilization During Tuberculosis and After Treatment

Tuberculosis

Background: The disease burden of tuberculosis (TB), second only to HIV/AIDS among infectious diseases, is a major public health problem in developing countries. Accumulating evidence suggests that iron status is a primary determinant of TB progression. Anaemia is prevalent in patients with TB, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, and associated with increased mortality. Anaemia in TB may be due to inflammation, dietary iron deficiency, or both, and distinguishing among these aetiologies is difficult. Iron supplementation is commonly used to treat anaemia in TB patients, but may be unnecessary if inflammation is the cause. Body iron sequestered by TB inflammation can be mobilized during treatment and used to correct the anaemia. Moreover, supplemental iron may be retained within macrophages, potentially increasing susceptibility to TB and leading to a poorer clinical outcome. Thus, better understanding of iron metabolism during TB and the aetiology of TB-related anaemia would clarify the potential role of iron in pathogenesis and optimal management of the disease. The investigators hypothesize that: a) TB will increase circulating hepcidin and thereby impair dietary iron absorption and systemic utilization of iron, resulting in iron sequestration and anaemia; b) TB treatment and resolution of inflammation over 6 months will decrease circulating hepcidin, correcting these impairments and improving iron status and hemoglobin; c) the majority of iron utilized to replenish hemoglobin during recovery from TB will come from mobilization of sequestered iron stores rather than from iron absorption. Objectives: Use iron stable isotopes to characterize iron balance over six months of TB treatment, and specifically to: a) quantify oral and intravenous iron incorporation (oral absorption and systemic iron utilization) at three time points during TB treatment (acute disease, after the intensive treatment phase and at completion of the continuation treatment phase); and b) determine the effect of treatment on iron mobilization from stores to replenish hemoglobin. Methods/Subjects: Using a triple stable-isotope technique, iron absorption from labelled test meals (57Fe) and systemic iron utilization after labelled intravenous doses (54Fe, 58Fe) will be determined in 18 Tanzanian subjects with newly diagnosed pulmonary TB. The subjects will be studied at three time points (i) the day after TB diagnosis while infected, (ii) after 8 weeks of intensive phase treatment, and (iii) after another 16 weeks of continuation phase treatment. Iron status, hemoglobin, hepcidin and inflammation indexes will be measured at each time point. Isotope enrichment during the two treatment phases will be measured to estimate the relative rates of iron absorption and mobilization from stores during the intensive and continuation phases to determine the relative contributions of iron absorption and iron mobilization from stores during TB treatment and recovery. Outcome: These studies will provide important new insights into the aetiology of anaemia and iron metabolism in TB patients. The results will provide essential data for evidence-based recommendations on the timing, administration route and efficacy of iron therapy in patients with TB, making possible, a safer and more effective treatment of anaemia in TB while decreasing morbidity and mortality from the disease.

Tanzania