Skip to content

Response Monitoring Trial in Patients With Suspected Recurrence of Glioblastoma

Randomized Metabolic Response Monitoring Trial in Patients With Suspected Recurrence of Glioblastoma FDOPA PET-CT

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02176720
Enrollment
31
Registered
2014-06-27
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2018-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glioblastoma, Glioblastoma Multiforme, Glioma

Keywords

Glioma, Glioblastoma, Glioblastoma multiforme, GBM, Recurrence, PET, FDOPA

Brief summary

It was previously shown that \[18F\]Fluorodopa (FDOPA) PET imaging results in intended management changes in 41% of brain tumor patients. However, its impact on patient outcome defined as survival, costs, and/or quality of life has not been demonstrated. Regulatory agencies require randomized trials to determine the impact of PET on patient management and outcome. In this study we hypothesize that the addition of FDOPA PET will improve patient outcome by more accurately identifying presence or absence of tumor recurrence than conventional imaging.

Detailed description

Malignant gliomas are aggressive primary brain tumors that almost always lead to rapid patient deterioration and death. Timely diagnosis of recurrent disease as well as accurate monitoring of therapeutic responses is critically important in glioblastoma patients. Despite introduction of new treatment approaches patient prognosis is poor with less than half of the patients being progression-free during the first 6 months after diagnosis of disease recurrence (6-month-progression-free survival rates of 46%). The current diagnostic standard of care for diagnosing and monitoring brain tumors is contrast-enhanced, multi-planar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, the ability of MRI for early detection of disease recurrence or progression is limited. Moreover, determination of treatment responses is difficult since benign tissue changes after radiation and/or chemotherapy can have the appearance of tumor recurrence or progression on MRI. Positron emission tomography (PET) is an established imaging technique that utilizes small amounts of radioactivity attached to very minimal amounts of substances (tracers) that are injected via a hand or arm vein. These substances can track certain features of cancers that can be visualized by using the PET-CT scanner. For instance, a number of different PET-tracers have been used to study brain tumor metabolism and to detect primary or recurrent tumors. These include tracers of glucose (\[18F\]FDG) and amino acid metabolism (e.g., \[11C\] methionine and \[18F\]FDOPA). Metabolic imaging of brain tumors with amino acid analogues has advantages over FDG. Since FDG assess glucose metabolism and the normal brain consumes a lot of glucose it can be difficult to detect tumors against high glucose use of normal brain tissue. FDOPA has been successfully used clinically for many years. The advantage of FDOPA is that normal brain tissue consumes very little FDOPA. Thus, tumors can be seen easily against a low background activity. FDOPA PET imaging detects brain tumors with a very high accuracy and affects the management of 40% of patients. However, its impact on patient outcome defined as survival, costs, and/or quality of life has not been demonstrated. Randomized trials are needed to evaluate the impact of PET on patient management and outcome. We will determine this by randomizing patients with suspected recurrence of glioblastoma into those who are managed using conventional diagnostic imaging versus those who will receive conventional imaging plus FDOPA PET. Randomization is like flipping a coin. Patients will have a 50% chance to undergo standard imaging or standard imaging combined with FDOPA PET. Approximately 25-40% of the patients with suspected tumor recurrence will have pseudo-progression on MRI (i.e., the images suggest that there is tumor recurrence when there is in fact no recurrence). These patients will have correctly negative FDOPA PET scans. In these patient initiation of treatment can be postponed. In contrast, patients with positive FDOPA PET scans will undergo some kind of treatment at the discretion of the treating physician (radiation therapy, chemotherapy or surgery). We will find out whether the management and treatment change that is based on FDOPA PET affects the survival of patients and affects the costs of caring for the patients.

Interventions

DRUGFDOPA PET

\[18F\]FDOPA radiopharmaceutical will be intravenousely injected for PET-CT scanning of the brain.

Sponsors

University of California, Los Angeles
CollaboratorOTHER
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Suspected first recurrence of a glioblastoma tumor by clinical measures and/or MRI * Age 18 and older

Exclusion criteria

* Breast feeding/ Pregnancy * Severe psychiatric illness * Primary diagnosis of a glioblastoma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic accuracy compared to standard diagnostics without PET5 yearsImaging findings will be validated by histopathology, clinical follow-up and/or repetitive imaging. If no histopathology within 3 months is available, clinical follow-up and imaging findings will be used for validation. If within 6 months of randomization no clinical progression nor progression on other imaging modalities is found, the patient will be rated as no disease present at time of imaging.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Impact of FDOPA PET on patient management[ Time Frame: 7 years ]Overall and progression free survival will be assessed according to the standard of clinical care with a minimum follow-up time of two years after randomization. In this study protocol there are no pre-set follow-up algorithms, however in clinical routine a follow-up every three months is standard.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026