Skip to content

High Dose Amoxicillin Versus Tetracycline as Second-line Treatment of Resistant Helicobacter Pylori Infection

Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing High Dose Amoxicillin Versus Tetracycline Based Quadruple Therapy as Second-line Treatment for Resistant Helicobacter Pylori Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02175927
Enrollment
312
Registered
2014-06-26
Start date
2014-07-31
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2016-03-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Helicobacter Pylori Treatment Failure

Keywords

Helicobacter pylori, Treatment Failure, second-line therapy

Brief summary

No trial has examined the the efficacy of high dose amoxicillin based quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. The study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of 14-day high dose amoxicillin-based quadruple regiment with classical quadruple regiment for rescue eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

Detailed description

Helicobacter pylori is the most successful human pathogen infecting an estimated 50% of the global population, and is associated with a spectrum of disease states, including chronic gastritis, duodenal and gastric ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, and gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALToma). Most Consensus Conferences and Clinical Guidelines recommend the prescription of a triple therapy including a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and clarithromycin with either amoxicillin or metronidazole, as first-line treatment. However, the effectiveness of these triple-therapy regimens seems to have diminished over time, largely as a result of emerging resistance of the organism to clarithromycin. Avoiding problems due to antibiotic resistance has become an important issue when deciding a second-line rescue therapy for H. pylori infection Bismuth-containing quadruple therapies have been used widely in second-line therapy of H. pylori infection, and are recommended by the Maastricht IV Consensus Conference report. Quadruple therapy can achieve a high rate of eradication success as a second-line treatment. A meta-analysis of quadruple therapy showed that metronidazole resistance had limited effect on the outcome when adequate dosages and durations are used. This meta-analysis also showed that compliance with quadruple therapy is high. Classical bismuth-based quadruple therapy consists of a PPI, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole. This regiment meets the proposed criteria for a second-line treatment: it does not contain the key antibiotic of the original regimen (clarithromycin), the treatment is not affected by clarithromycin resistance, metronidazole resistance in vitro does not affect the outcome of quadruple therapy significantly, compliance with the regimen is high and the regimen is effective in most parts of the world. But this regiment has high rate of side effects because of tetracycline. Amoxicillin has low resistance rate as well as low percentage of side effects. The replacement of tetracycline by high dose amoxicillin in classical bismuth-containing quadruple therapy may be a better choice. Therefore, we will do a randomized trial to compare the eradication rate of 14-day high dose amoxicillin and metronidazole based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy with classical quadruple therapy for second-line Helicobacter pylori treatment.

Interventions

DRUGLansoprazole

antisecretory drug of each quadruple therapy

DRUGBismuth Potassium Citrate

one component of each quadruple therapy

DRUGMetronidazole

antibiotic of each quadruple therapy

DRUGAmoxicillin

antibiotic of high dose amoxicillin based quadruple therapy

DRUGTetracycline

antibiotic of classical quadruple therapy

Sponsors

Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* all patients had failed H.pylori therapies including clarithromycin, metronidazole and/or amoxicillin (if not allergic) before * indication of rescue H pylori eradication treatment * Ability and willingness to participate in the study and to sign and give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* patients less than 18 years old * previous gastric surgery * pregnancy or lactation * major systemic diseases, * administration of antibiotics, bismuth, antisecretory drugs in the preceding 8 weeks * allergy to any one of the medication used in the quadruple regimens.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori2 monthsAccess eradication rate of H. pylori by intention to treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis in each treatment group

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of side effects of each treatment2 monthsScore side effects as mild, moderate or severe according to their influence on daily activities

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of antibiotics against each helicobacter pylori clinical isolate2 monthsDetermine MIC of amoxicillin, tetracycline, and metronidazole by the twofold agar dilution method.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026