Skip to content

Randomized Controlled Clinical Outcomes of the Vanguard XP Bicruciate Knee System

Randomized Controlled Clinical Outcomes of the Vanguard XP Bicruciate Knee System

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02175576
Acronym
GK9B
Enrollment
50
Registered
2014-06-26
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2023-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complications, Arthroplasty, Lower Limb Deformity, Osteoarthritis, Post-traumatic Deformity, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Traumatic Arthritis

Brief summary

Randomized Controlled Study to determine if preservation of ligaments provides increased functional ability post-operatively in comparison to traditional TKA which sacrifices soft tissue.

Detailed description

Randomized Controlled Study to compare clinical and patient reported outcomes of the Vanguard XP Bicruciate Total Knee System to the Vanguard CR Knee System through 10 years of follow-up.

Interventions

DEVICEVanguard XP Bicruciate Knee System

The Vanguard XP is a bicruciate retaining total knee design and is constrained by natural soft tissue.

DEVICEVanguard CR Knee System

The Vanguard CR system requires the ACL to be sacrificed and is constrained by soft tissue and device design.

Sponsors

Zimmer Biomet
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* cemented application of components * bilateral subjects randomized by knee * patients with pre-existing contralateral knee surgery * painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or traumatic arthritis where one or more compartments are involved * correction of varus, valgus, or posttraumatic deformity * sufficient soft tissue surrounding the knee, including the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Exclusion criteria

* cementless application of components * BMI greater than or equal to 40 * use of Anterior Stabilized Bearings * patients with severe pre-operative varus or valgus deformity greater than or equal to 15 degrees * correction or revision of previous joint replacement procedure on index knee * infection * sepsis * osteomyelitis Relative

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Knees Reported as Feels Normal on a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)12 MonthsParticipants answered a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) which asked how they rated their knee function. A score of 100 indicates normal and anything below 100 indicates a percentage of normal function.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Modified Knee Society Score12 monthsThe American Knee Society Score is part clinical exam and part patient administered assessment of the knee. The objective part of the score was collected in the clinic by qualified personnel. The functional and pain components of the score were collected by patient completed questionnaire. Total scores can range from 0 to 200, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
Revisions/Removals3 yearsNumber of study device revisions or removals reported during the study.
Number of Knees Reported as Feels at Least 80% of Normal on a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)12 MonthsParticipants answered a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) which asked how they rated their knee function. A score of 100 indicates normal and anything below 100 indicates a percentage of normal function.
Number of Knees With Which Participants Reported Being Happy or Very Happy12 MonthsParticipants answered a survey which asked how they they would describe their satisfaction with their new joint. Options for answers included I have never been happy, Ok - but not perfect, Happy, and Very Happy.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

After obtaining informed consent, participants were evaluated according to protocol-defined eligibility (inclusion and exclusion) criteria. If a participant did not meet the eligibility criteria, he or she was excluded from participation and not assigned to a study group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Vanguard XP Bicruciate Knee System
Vanguard XP Bicruciate Knee System: The Vanguard XP is a bicruciate retaining total knee design and is constrained by natural soft tissue.
20
Vanguard XP Bicruciate Knee System
Vanguard XP Bicruciate Knee System: The Vanguard XP is a bicruciate retaining total knee design and is constrained by natural soft tissue.
22
Vanguard CR Knee System
Vanguard CR Knee System: The Vanguard CR system requires the ACL to be sacrificed and is constrained by soft tissue and device design.
30
Vanguard CR Knee System
Vanguard CR Knee System: The Vanguard CR system requires the ACL to be sacrificed and is constrained by soft tissue and device design.
33
Total105

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVanguard XP Bicruciate Knee SystemVanguard CR Knee SystemTotal
Age, Continuous64.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
66.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
65.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
Modified Knee Society Score111.0 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27
114.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.6
113.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.4
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 Participants30 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Knees17 Knees30 Knees
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Knees16 Knees25 Knees

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 13 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 207 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Knees Reported as Feels Normal on a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)

Participants answered a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) which asked how they rated their knee function. A score of 100 indicates normal and anything below 100 indicates a percentage of normal function.

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: All knees that contributed a SANE score for function at 12 months were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Vanguard XP Bicruciate Knee SystemNumber of Knees Reported as Feels Normal on a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)1 Knees
Vanguard CR Knee SystemNumber of Knees Reported as Feels Normal on a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)2 Knees
Secondary

Modified Knee Society Score

The American Knee Society Score is part clinical exam and part patient administered assessment of the knee. The objective part of the score was collected in the clinic by qualified personnel. The functional and pain components of the score were collected by patient completed questionnaire. Total scores can range from 0 to 200, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: All patients that contributed a Modified Knee Society Score (mKSS) at 12 months were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Vanguard XP Bicruciate Knee SystemModified Knee Society Score164.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.4
Vanguard CR Knee SystemModified Knee Society Score168.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.9
Secondary

Number of Knees Reported as Feels at Least 80% of Normal on a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)

Participants answered a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) which asked how they rated their knee function. A score of 100 indicates normal and anything below 100 indicates a percentage of normal function.

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: All knees that contributed a SANE score for function at 12 months were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Vanguard XP Bicruciate Knee SystemNumber of Knees Reported as Feels at Least 80% of Normal on a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)10 Knees
Vanguard CR Knee SystemNumber of Knees Reported as Feels at Least 80% of Normal on a Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)20 Knees
Secondary

Number of Knees With Which Participants Reported Being Happy or Very Happy

Participants answered a survey which asked how they they would describe their satisfaction with their new joint. Options for answers included I have never been happy, Ok - but not perfect, Happy, and Very Happy.

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: All patients that contributed a patient satisfaction score at 12 months were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Vanguard XP Bicruciate Knee SystemNumber of Knees With Which Participants Reported Being Happy or Very Happy12 Knees
Vanguard CR Knee SystemNumber of Knees With Which Participants Reported Being Happy or Very Happy18 Knees
Secondary

Revisions/Removals

Number of study device revisions or removals reported during the study.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Participants who were randomized, underwent surgery, and received the study device.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vanguard XP Bicruciate Knee SystemRevisions/Removals0 Revisions/Reoperations
Vanguard CR Knee SystemRevisions/Removals0 Revisions/Reoperations

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026