Skip to content

Long-term Deferiprone Treatment in Patients With Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration

Long-term Safety and Efficacy Study of Deferiprone in Patients With Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration (PKAN)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02174848
Acronym
TIRCON-EXT
Enrollment
68
Registered
2014-06-26
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2018-03-16
Last updated
2020-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration

Keywords

Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration, PKAN, Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation, NBIA, Deferiprone, Ferriprox

Brief summary

Patients with PKAN will be treated with the iron chelator deferiprone for 18 months. Only patients who have completed the earlier study TIRCON2012V1 (NCT01741532), a double-blind placebo-controlled trial in which participants were randomized to receive either deferiprone or placebo for 18 months, are eligible to enroll.

Detailed description

TIRCON2012V1-EXT is a multi-center, single-arm, open-label study. All patients who completed the earlier study TIRCON2012V1 (NCT01741532) are eligible to take part. In the initial study, patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive 18 months of treatment with either the iron chelator deferiprone or placebo, respectively. In this extension study, all participants will receive deferiprone for 18 months. Thus, depending on which product was received earlier, patients will be on deferiprone for a total of either 1.5 years or 3 years. As in the earlier study, assessments will be carried out every six months to look at the safety of the drug and to see if patients are showing any improvement in dystonia and other symptoms of PKAN.

Interventions

Deferiprone oral solution at a dosage of up to 15 mg per kilogram of body weight, twice a day

Sponsors

ApoPharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

All participants in this study received the same intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Completed study TIRCON2012V1

Exclusion criteria

* Withdrew from the study TIRCON2012V1 for reasons of safety * Plan to participate in another clinical trial at any time from the day of enrolment until 30 days post-treatment in the current study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Adverse Events18 monthsSafety and tolerability were assessed based on changes in: frequency of adverse events (AEs), frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs), and discontinuation due to AEs. No statistical comparison between the groups was conducted as all participants received the same study product.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Treatment Groups Over Each StudyBaseline and Month 18 of each studyThe Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) scale is an instrument for rating the severity of dystonia in eight body regions. The individual scores are summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 32; the higher the score, the more severe the dystonia. Patients were assessed for the change in total BAD score over the course of both the initial study (during which one group received placebo and the other received deferiprone) and the extension study (during which both groups received deferiprone).
Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across StudiesBaseline and Month 18 of each studyThe Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) scale is an instrument for rating the severity of dystonia in eight body regions. The individual scores are summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 32; the higher the score, the more severe the dystonia. Patients were assessed for the change in total BAD score over the course of each study.
Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of DFP-DFP Patients Across StudiesBaseline and Month 18 of each studyThe Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) scale is an instrument for rating the severity of dystonia in eight body regions. The individual scores are summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 32; the higher the score, the more severe the dystonia. Patients were assessed for the change in total BAD score over the course of the study.
Proportion of Patients With Improved or Unchanged BAD ScoreMonth 18 of each studyPatients were deemed to be responders if their BAD total score either improved or remained unchanged from baseline, with baseline being the start of each study for the placebo-DFP group and the start of the initial study for the DFP-DFP group
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across StudiesMonth 18 of each studyThe Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a global index used to rate the response of a condition to a therapy. Patients were asked at each post-baseline visit to rate their overall condition since the start of the extension study on a 7-point rating scale: 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.

Countries

Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo-DFP
Patients who received 18 months of placebo treatment in the TIRCON2012V1 study and were then switched to deferiprone in the extension study, so received up to 18 months of deferiprone treatment.
24
DFP-DFP
Patients who received 18 months of deferiprone treatment in the TIRCON2012V1 study and continued to receive it in the extension study, so received up to 36 months of deferiprone treatment.
44
Total68

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event21
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyUnable to comply with study requirements10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject33
Overall StudyWorsening of disease11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo-DFPDFP-DFPTotal
Age, Continuous19.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
22.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
21.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
BAD score at baseline
BAD score at baseline of extension study
20.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
21.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
21.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
BAD score at baseline
BAD score at baseline of initial study
16.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
19.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
18.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
22 Participants41 Participants63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants16 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants28 Participants38 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 68
other
Total, other adverse events
66 / 68
serious
Total, serious adverse events
33 / 68

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Safety and tolerability were assessed based on changes in: frequency of adverse events (AEs), frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs), and discontinuation due to AEs. No statistical comparison between the groups was conducted as all participants received the same study product.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo-DFPNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsNumber of patients with at least one AE22 Participants
Placebo-DFPNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsNumber of patients with at least one SAE12 Participants
Placebo-DFPNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsNumber of patients who withdrew due to an AE2 Participants
DFP-DFPNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsNumber of patients with at least one AE42 Participants
DFP-DFPNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsNumber of patients who withdrew due to an AE1 Participants
DFP-DFPNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsNumber of patients with at least one SAE14 Participants
Secondary

Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of DFP-DFP Patients Across Studies

The Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) scale is an instrument for rating the severity of dystonia in eight body regions. The individual scores are summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 32; the higher the score, the more severe the dystonia. Patients were assessed for the change in total BAD score over the course of the study.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 18 of each study

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-DFPChange in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of DFP-DFP Patients Across Studies1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
DFP-DFPChange in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of DFP-DFP Patients Across Studies1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
p-value: 0.2684paired t-test
Secondary

Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies

The Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) scale is an instrument for rating the severity of dystonia in eight body regions. The individual scores are summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 32; the higher the score, the more severe the dystonia. Patients were assessed for the change in total BAD score over the course of each study.

Time frame: Baseline and Month 18 of each study

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-DFPChange in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
DFP-DFPChange in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
p-value: 0.0206paired t-test
Secondary

Change in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Treatment Groups Over Each Study

The Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) scale is an instrument for rating the severity of dystonia in eight body regions. The individual scores are summed to provide a total score that ranges from 0 to 32; the higher the score, the more severe the dystonia. Patients were assessed for the change in total BAD score over the course of both the initial study (during which one group received placebo and the other received deferiprone) and the extension study (during which both groups received deferiprone).

Time frame: Baseline and Month 18 of each study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-DFPChange in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Treatment Groups Over Each StudyChange in BAD score over initial study4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Placebo-DFPChange in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Treatment Groups Over Each StudyChange in BAD score over extension study1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
DFP-DFPChange in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Treatment Groups Over Each StudyChange in BAD score over initial study1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
DFP-DFPChange in Score on the BAD Scale -- Comparison of Treatment Groups Over Each StudyChange in BAD score over extension study1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Comparison: This comparison is for the initial study, during which patients in the placebo-DFP group received placebo and patients in the DFP-DFP group received deferiprone.p-value: 0.05t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: This comparison is for the extension study, during which patients in both groups received deferiprone.p-value: 0.9781t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies

The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a global index used to rate the response of a condition to a therapy. Patients were asked at each post-baseline visit to rate their overall condition since the start of the extension study on a 7-point rating scale: 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.

Time frame: Month 18 of each study

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo-DFPPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
DFP-DFPPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Comparison of Placebo-DFP Patients Across Studies4.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
p-value: 0.3306t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With Improved or Unchanged BAD Score

Patients were deemed to be responders if their BAD total score either improved or remained unchanged from baseline, with baseline being the start of each study for the placebo-DFP group and the start of the initial study for the DFP-DFP group

Time frame: Month 18 of each study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Placebo-DFPProportion of Patients With Improved or Unchanged BAD ScoreCompletion of initial study3 Participants
Placebo-DFPProportion of Patients With Improved or Unchanged BAD ScoreCompletion of 18 months of deferiprone treatment9 Participants
DFP-DFPProportion of Patients With Improved or Unchanged BAD ScoreCompletion of 18 months of deferiprone treatment17 Participants
DFP-DFPProportion of Patients With Improved or Unchanged BAD ScoreCompletion of initial study17 Participants
Comparison: This comparison is for the initial study, during which patients in the placebo-DFP group received placebo and patients in the DFP-DFP group received deferipronep-value: 0.0821t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: For the placebo-DFP group, the comparison is of the scores at the start vs. the end of the extension study; for the DFP-DFP group, the comparison is of the scores at the start vs. the end of the initial studyp-value: 0.5885t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026