Skip to content

Regression of Myocardial Fibrosis After Aortic Valve Replacement

REgression in Left Ventricular Interstitial Expansion and Fibrosis After Aortic Stenosis Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02174471
Acronym
RELIEF-AS
Enrollment
181
Registered
2014-06-25
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2016-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aortic Stenosis

Keywords

Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Valve Replacement, T1 Mapping, Extracellular Volume Fraction, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis

Brief summary

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart condition in the United Kingdom and the Western world. Surgery for severe AS prior to symptom onset is controversial. Conventionally changes in valve area and gradient are used to time intervention but myocardial changes may be more predictive of surgical need. This study aims to elucidate the role of diffuse myocardial fibrosis as a prognostic marker, implementing a novel, non-invasive MRI technique to measure it. Design: The investigators will measure diffuse myocardial fibrosis in 150 patients with severe narrowing of the aortic valve before and one year after valve replacement. Expected outcomes: Diffuse myocardial fibrosis measured by MRI scanning will predict outcome after surgery in aortic stenosis. Anticipated Health Benefits: Identify patients with higher post operative morbidity and mortality, who may benefit from earlier valve replacement.

Detailed description

Surgery for severe aortic stenosis (AS) prior to symptom onset is controversial. Conventionally changes in valve area and gradient are used to time intervention but myocardial changes may be more predictive of surgical need. This study aims to elucidate the role of diffuse myocardial fibrosis as a prognostic marker, implementing a novel, non-invasive technique to measure it. AS is the most common valvular heart condition in the United Kingdom and the Western world. Its prevalence rises with age - about 3% aged over 75 have severe AS. During a period of progressive valve narrowing, the left ventricle (LV) adapts to the increased pressure with increasing concentric muscle hypertrophy. However, eventually this remodelling becomes maladaptive and the LV less compliant, leading to symptoms (breathlessness, chest pain, and loss of consciousness). This heralds a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. Consequently aortic valve replacement (AVR) in symptomatic patients is a Class I indication. In most asymptomatic patients however, prophylactic surgery is controversial: the risk of surgery is thought to be greater than watchful waiting, although there is no randomised data to support this approach. Conversely, diffuse myocardial fibrosis is thought to play a key role in functional deterioration, symptom development and possibly outcome in AS. Unfortunately, assessment of AS severity, including hemodynamic parameters such as peak velocity and mean gradient, poorly predict symptom development and/or optimal timing of surgery. A non-invasive technique to quantify diffuse myocardial fibrosis against the gold standard of myocardial biopsy has been developed and validated in patients with AS: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with T1 mapping uses the extracellular tracer gadolinium to measure the extracellular volume (ECV), which closely reflects the degree of diffuse fibrosis. An important observation in a previous cohort (Flett et al European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging 2012) was the fate of patients with severe fibrosis: they were more symptomatic at baseline, improved the most post-operatively and yet carried a trend towards increased mortality at six months. To unravel this, this study aims to track diffuse fibrosis in the RELIEF-AS study with a larger cohort (n=150) and for longer (12 months) to understand how to use diffuse fibrosis as a prognostic marker.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University College, London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Severe aortic stenosis (1 or more of: aortic valve area \< 1.0cm2, peak pressure gradient \>64mmHg, or mean pressure gradient \> 40mmHg). * Symptomatic. * Age \> 18 years and \< 90 years.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe valvular disease other than AS. * Previous Valve surgery * Severe renal impairment eGFR \< 30ml/min. * Any absolute contraindication to CMR * Other medical condition that limits life expectancy or precludes AVR. * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cardiovascular death12 months
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)12 monthsMACE: hospitalisation with heart failure, chest pain, syncope, arrhythmia or stroke

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional improvement12 monthsImprovement in 6 minute walk test.
Regression of diffuse myocardial fibrosis12 monthsDiffuse myocardial fibrosis measured by T1 mapping by CMR

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
LV remodeling post AVR12 monthsLV remodeling post AVR measured by CMR and transthoracic echocardiography.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026