Skip to content

Ultrashort GnRH Agonist/Antagonist Versus GnRH Antagonist IVF

Ultrashort Flare GnRH Agonist Combined With Flexible Multidose GnRH Antagonist Versus Flexible Multidose GnRH Antagonist for Good-prognosis IVF Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02173977
Enrollment
200
Registered
2014-06-25
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2017-05-31
Last updated
2014-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Keywords

GnRH Agonist, GnRH Antagonist, OHSS

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the appropriate controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol in good prognosis patients undergoing IVF treatment. The stimulation characteristics of cycles which include ultrashort flare GnRH agonist combined with flexible multidose GnRH antagonist will be compared to the flexible multidose GnRH antagonist protocol. The investigators hypothesized that combining the stimulatory effect of GnRH agonists and immediate suppression of the GnRH antagonist in a unique protocol may be a valuable new COH strategy for IVF patients, resulting in improved ART outcome.

Detailed description

The ultrashort flare GnRH agonist combined with flexible multidose GnRH antagonist protocol during COH cycle resulted in a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate in patients with poor embryo quality, with repeated IVF failures and in poor responders. This protocol combines the effect of the microdose flare on endogenous follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) release with the benefit of an immediate luteinizing hormone suppression of the GnRH antagonist. The basic hypothesis of this approach can also benefit IVF patients with good prognosis without compromising the ability to use gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to effectively trigger ovulation, while completely eliminating any threat of clinically significant ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The purpose of the study is to compare cycles consisting of ultrashort flare GnRH agonist combined with flexible multidose GnRH antagonist with those using the flexible multidose GnRH antagonist protocol 1\. To compare the IVF outcome variables and ongoing pregnancy rates.

Interventions

OTHERARM A- Agonist/Antagonist protocol

In vitro fertilization (IVF/ICSI)

OTHERARM B- Antagonist protocol

In vitro fertilization (IVF/ICSI)

Sponsors

Sheba Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Up to three previous IVF attempts

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with poor or no response in previous COH for IVF cycles * Abnormal ovarian reserve test i.e. anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), Antral follicle test * Risk factor for Diminished Ovarian Reserve

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ongoing pregnancy rates2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total gonadotropin use2 Years
Biochemical pregnancy2 YearsPositive pregnancy test without documentation of intrauterine or extrauterine pregnancy
Clinical pregnancy2 YearsPositive pregnancy test with documentation of intrauterine or extrauterine pregnancy
Multiple pregnancy rate2 Years
Fertilization rate2 Years
Number of oocytes2 years
OHSS rates2 Years
Embryo quality2 YearsGrading of a day 3 embryo based on the number of cells that make up the embryo, the amount of fragmentation, and the symmetry of each of the embryo's cells (blastomeres). E.g. good quality embryos: embryos that reach the eight-cell stage with less than 20% fragmentation on day 3
Miscarriage rate2 Years

Other

MeasureTime frame
Positive Pregnancy Test2 Years

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026