Skip to content

Comparison of the Accuracy and Reliability of AMH, FSH and AFC in Predicting Ovarian Response

Comparison of the Accuracy and Reliability of AMH, FSH and AFC in Predicting Ovarian Response

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02173444
Acronym
AMH FSH AFC
Enrollment
820
Registered
2014-06-25
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Keywords

in-vitro fertilization, ovarian stimulation

Brief summary

Serum bio-markers have different prediction values for ovarian response during ovarian stimulation in-vitro fertilization

Interventions

OTHERBlood test

Sponsors

Vietnam National University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≤ 45 years at the time of FSH starting * BMI \< 25 kg/m2, * First IVF attempt * Receiving GnRH-antagonist protocol * Had oocyte retrieval

Exclusion criteria

* Had ovarian stimulation or ovulation induction within 2 months prior to the study * PCOS * Had ovarian tumor or endometrioma * Hyperprolactinemia * Thyroid hormone disorders * Pituitary failure * Had other medical situations such as liver failure, renal failure, heart disease, diabetes, depression * Had IVM

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of oocytesAt the time of oocyte retrieval
number of oocytes at time of oocyte retrievalup to 14 days

Countries

Vietnam

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026