Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Lomitapide in Japanese Patients With HoFH on Concurrent Lipid-Lowering Therapy

A Phase 3, Single-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lomitapide in Japanese Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) on Concurrent Lipid-Lowering Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02173158
Enrollment
9
Registered
2014-06-24
Start date
2014-04-02
Completion date
2015-12-17
Last updated
2018-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Familial Hypercholesterolemia - Homozygous

Brief summary

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lomitapide in Japanese Patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) on Concurrent Lipid-Lowering Therapy.

Detailed description

This is a Phase 3, single-arm, open-label, multicenter clinical trial to evaluate both the efficacy and long-term safety of lomitapide in Japanese patients with HoFH receiving maximally-tolerated, stable lipid-lowering therapy. This study is comprised of a run-in period, a primary 26-week Efficacy Phase, and a 30-week Safety Phase.

Interventions

Sponsors

Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Japanese male and female patients aged ≥ 18 years of age who are receiving maximally tolerated, stable, lipid-lowering therapy 2. Diagnosis of functional HoFH 3. Body weight ≥ 40 kg and \< 136 kg 4. Negative pregnancy test at screening

Exclusion criteria

1. Uncontrolled hypertension 2. History of chronic renal insufficiency 3. History of biopsy proven cirrhosis or abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) at screening 4. Any major surgical procedure occurring \< 3 months prior to the screening visit 5. Cardiac insufficiency 6. Previous organ transplantation 7. History of a non-skin malignancy within the previous 3 years 8. Patients who are not able to limit their alcohol intake 9. Participation in an investigational drug study within 6 weeks prior to the screening visit 10. Known significant gastrointestinal bowel disease 11. Nursing mothers 12. Serious or unstable medical or psychological conditions 13. Requirement for certain prohibited medications known to be potentially hepatotoxic 14. Use of strong or moderate inhibitors of CYP3A4 15. Use of simvastatin at doses \>10 mg per day 16. Documented diagnosis of any liver disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in LDL-CBaseline to Week 26Mean percent change from baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Apo BBaseline to Week 56Mean percent change from baseline
Change in TriglyceridesBaseline to Week 56Mean percent change from baseline
Change in Non-HDL-CBaseline to Week 56Mean percent change from baseline
Change in VLDL-CBaseline to Week 56Mean percent change from baseline
Change in Total CholesterolBaseline to Week 56Mean percent change from baseline
Change in HDL-CBaseline to Week 56Mean percent change from baseline
Change in Apo AIBaseline to Week 56Mean percent change from baseline
Change in LDL-CBaseline to Week 56Mean percent change from baseline
Change in Lp(a)Baseline to Week 56Mean percent change from baseline

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lomitapide
Maximum tolerated dose of lomitapide (up to 60mg/day) in addition to existing lipid lowering therapy including plasmapheresis or lipid apheresis.
9
Total9

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Efficacy PhaseAdverse Event1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLomitapide
Age, Continuous50.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.71
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 90 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 97 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 91 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in LDL-C

Mean percent change from baseline

Time frame: Baseline to Week 26

Population: Full analysis set for the efficacy phase, included all subjects who received study drug and had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in LDL-C-42.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 18.16
Secondary

Change in Apo AI

Mean percent change from baseline

Time frame: Baseline to Week 56

Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapideChange in Apo AI-2.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 11.61
Secondary

Change in Apo B

Mean percent change from baseline

Time frame: Baseline to Week 56

Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapideChange in Apo B-41.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 21.9
Secondary

Change in HDL-C

Mean percent change from baseline

Time frame: Baseline to Week 56

Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapideChange in HDL-C5.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 19.64
Secondary

Change in LDL-C

Mean percent change from baseline

Time frame: Baseline to Week 56

Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapideChange in LDL-C-37.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 24.21
Secondary

Change in Lp(a)

Mean percent change from baseline

Time frame: Baseline to Week 56

Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapideChange in Lp(a)-27.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 23.5
Secondary

Change in Non-HDL-C

Mean percent change from baseline

Time frame: Baseline to Week 56

Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapideChange in Non-HDL-C-34.6 Percent changeStandard Deviation 22.5
Secondary

Change in Total Cholesterol

Mean percent change from baseline

Time frame: Baseline to Week 56

Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapideChange in Total Cholesterol-25.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 18.57
Secondary

Change in Triglycerides

Mean percent change from baseline

Time frame: Baseline to Week 56

Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapideChange in Triglycerides-44.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 12.7
Secondary

Change in VLDL-C

Mean percent change from baseline

Time frame: Baseline to Week 56

Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapideChange in VLDL-C-44.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 12.05

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026