Familial Hypercholesterolemia - Homozygous
Conditions
Brief summary
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lomitapide in Japanese Patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) on Concurrent Lipid-Lowering Therapy.
Detailed description
This is a Phase 3, single-arm, open-label, multicenter clinical trial to evaluate both the efficacy and long-term safety of lomitapide in Japanese patients with HoFH receiving maximally-tolerated, stable lipid-lowering therapy. This study is comprised of a run-in period, a primary 26-week Efficacy Phase, and a 30-week Safety Phase.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Japanese male and female patients aged ≥ 18 years of age who are receiving maximally tolerated, stable, lipid-lowering therapy 2. Diagnosis of functional HoFH 3. Body weight ≥ 40 kg and \< 136 kg 4. Negative pregnancy test at screening
Exclusion criteria
1. Uncontrolled hypertension 2. History of chronic renal insufficiency 3. History of biopsy proven cirrhosis or abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) at screening 4. Any major surgical procedure occurring \< 3 months prior to the screening visit 5. Cardiac insufficiency 6. Previous organ transplantation 7. History of a non-skin malignancy within the previous 3 years 8. Patients who are not able to limit their alcohol intake 9. Participation in an investigational drug study within 6 weeks prior to the screening visit 10. Known significant gastrointestinal bowel disease 11. Nursing mothers 12. Serious or unstable medical or psychological conditions 13. Requirement for certain prohibited medications known to be potentially hepatotoxic 14. Use of strong or moderate inhibitors of CYP3A4 15. Use of simvastatin at doses \>10 mg per day 16. Documented diagnosis of any liver disease
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change in LDL-C | Baseline to Week 26 | Mean percent change from baseline |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Apo B | Baseline to Week 56 | Mean percent change from baseline |
| Change in Triglycerides | Baseline to Week 56 | Mean percent change from baseline |
| Change in Non-HDL-C | Baseline to Week 56 | Mean percent change from baseline |
| Change in VLDL-C | Baseline to Week 56 | Mean percent change from baseline |
| Change in Total Cholesterol | Baseline to Week 56 | Mean percent change from baseline |
| Change in HDL-C | Baseline to Week 56 | Mean percent change from baseline |
| Change in Apo AI | Baseline to Week 56 | Mean percent change from baseline |
| Change in LDL-C | Baseline to Week 56 | Mean percent change from baseline |
| Change in Lp(a) | Baseline to Week 56 | Mean percent change from baseline |
Countries
Japan
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Lomitapide Maximum tolerated dose of lomitapide (up to 60mg/day) in addition to existing lipid lowering therapy including plasmapheresis or lipid apheresis. | 9 |
| Total | 9 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy Phase | Adverse Event | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Lomitapide |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 50.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.71 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 9 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 4 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 5 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 9 | 0 / 8 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 9 / 9 | 7 / 8 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 9 | 1 / 8 |
Outcome results
Percent Change in LDL-C
Mean percent change from baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Week 26
Population: Full analysis set for the efficacy phase, included all subjects who received study drug and had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lomitapide | Percent Change in LDL-C | -42.2 Percent change | Standard Deviation 18.16 |
Change in Apo AI
Mean percent change from baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Week 56
Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lomitapide | Change in Apo AI | -2.8 Percent change | Standard Deviation 11.61 |
Change in Apo B
Mean percent change from baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Week 56
Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lomitapide | Change in Apo B | -41.4 Percent change | Standard Deviation 21.9 |
Change in HDL-C
Mean percent change from baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Week 56
Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lomitapide | Change in HDL-C | 5.9 Percent change | Standard Deviation 19.64 |
Change in LDL-C
Mean percent change from baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Week 56
Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lomitapide | Change in LDL-C | -37.5 Percent change | Standard Deviation 24.21 |
Change in Lp(a)
Mean percent change from baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Week 56
Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lomitapide | Change in Lp(a) | -27.2 Percent change | Standard Deviation 23.5 |
Change in Non-HDL-C
Mean percent change from baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Week 56
Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lomitapide | Change in Non-HDL-C | -34.6 Percent change | Standard Deviation 22.5 |
Change in Total Cholesterol
Mean percent change from baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Week 56
Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lomitapide | Change in Total Cholesterol | -25.9 Percent change | Standard Deviation 18.57 |
Change in Triglycerides
Mean percent change from baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Week 56
Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lomitapide | Change in Triglycerides | -44.4 Percent change | Standard Deviation 12.7 |
Change in VLDL-C
Mean percent change from baseline
Time frame: Baseline to Week 56
Population: Full analysis set for the safety phase included all subjects who received study drug during the safety phase and had at least one assessment during the safety phase
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lomitapide | Change in VLDL-C | -44.8 Percent change | Standard Deviation 12.05 |