Skip to content

Insole Sensor to Determine Optimal Limb Loading

Development and Clinical Trial of an Insole Sensor to Determine Optimal Limb Loading in the Rehabilitation of OTA Type 42IIIB and IIIC Lower Extremity Fractures

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02170493
Enrollment
19
Registered
2014-06-23
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2017-07-10
Last updated
2017-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lower Extremity Fractures

Keywords

Insole Sensor, Optimial Limb Loading, 42IIIB, IIIC, Lower Extremity Fractures

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to use a novel load monitoring technology to correlate limb loading to OTA type 42IIIB and IIIC tibial fracture outcomes. This study will be the first to collect continuous limb loading data and will provide the first objective insight into how limb loading directs fracture healing. To meet this purpose, two specific aims have been developed. Specific Aim 1: Preclinical validation of a load-monitoring insole The Hitchcock laboratory has overcome the greatest technical hurdle for continuous limb load monitoring: development of load sensor technology that is affordable, accurate and capable of monitoring for over four weeks. To develop this sensor technology into a load-monitoring insole, the Hitchcock lab will incorporate consumer type electronics into the design, including a microprocessor, battery, and data storage media. Following construction of a functional load-monitoring insole, a pilot human study with orthopaedic trauma patients from the University of Utah (N=20) will be conducted to identify modes of device failure, improve device interfacing and develop data handling protocols and software for the clinical arm of the proposed study. Specific Aim 2: Conduct a prospective, direct observational cohort study. Thirty (30) open tibial fracture patients will be recruited at two centers: University of Utah (N=15) and William Beaumont Army Medical Center (N=15). Participants will wear a walking boot instrumented with the load-monitoring insole that will continuously record limb loading and serve as a step counter. X-rays collected at standard-of-care follow-up visits will be used by Drs. Kubiak and Orr to subjectively evaluate fracture healing. A questionnaire regarding subjective perception of patient compliance will be collected at the first and last follow-up visits. Data collected from the insole sensor will be correlated to objective measures of fracture healing and subjective measures of patient compliance to determine the effect of patient limb loading on injury outcome. The Hitchcock laboratory will develop software to process and summarize data from the load monitoring insole and continually improve human interfacing factors of the load monitoring insole based off of feedback from the clinical team and study participants.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

William Beaumont Army Medical Center
CollaboratorFED
University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Specific Aim 1 Inclusion Criteria * Patient is 18 years of age or older * Patient has below the knee fracture * Patient speaks English * Patient weighs between 100 and 250 pounds * Patient lives in close enough proximity to the the hospital to return for all appointments (\ 100 miles) Specific Aim 2 Inclusion Criteria * Patient is 18 years of age or older * Patient has a tibia fracture * Patient speaks English * Patient weighs between 100 and 250 pounds * Patient lives in close enough proximity to the the hospital to return for all appointments (\ 100 miles)

Exclusion criteria

Specific Aim 1

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Activity Measure (PAM-13) QuestionnaireFollow Up Visits up to 1-YearA subjective evaluation of perceived compliance with physician instruction

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
X-ray (AP and Lateral)Follow Up Visits up to 1 YearSubjectively evaluate fracture healing

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026