Skip to content

A Multi-centre Observational Study of the Axium Neurostimulator as a Treatment for Chronic Pain

a PRospEctive Post Market Trial of Drg stImulation With the Commercially Available Axium

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02169401
Acronym
PREDICT
Enrollment
135
Registered
2014-06-23
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2017-01-25
Last updated
2024-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Brief summary

08-SMI-2012 is a post market, observational, questionnaire based study to assess the effectiveness of the commercially available Axium neurostimulator in the management of intractable, chronic pain.

Interventions

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is at least 18 years old 2. Subject is able and willing to comply with the follow-up schedule and protocol 3. Chronic, intractable pain for at least 6 months 4. Failed conservative treatments for chronic pain including but not limited to pharmacological therapy, physical therapy and interventional pain procedures for chronic pain 5. Average baseline pain rating of 60 mm on the Visual Analog Scale in the primary region of pain 6. In the opinion of the Investigator, the subject is psychologically appropriate for the implantation for an active implantable medical device 7. Subject is able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Female subject of childbearing potential is pregnant/nursing, plans to become pregnant or is unwilling to use approved birth control 2. Escalating or changing pain condition within the past month as evidenced by investigator examination 3. Subject has had corticosteroid therapy at an intended site of stimulation within the past 30 days 4. Subject has had radiofrequency treatment of an intended target DRG within the past 3 months 5. Subject currently has an active implantable device including implantable cardioverter defibrillator, pacemaker, spinal cord stimulator or intrathecal drug pump 6. Subject is unable to operate the device 7. Subjects currently has an active infection 8. Subject has, in the opinion of the Investigator, a medical comorbidity that contraindicates placement of an active medical device 9. Subject has participated in another clinical trial within 30 days 10. Subject has a coagulation disorder or uses anticoagulants that, in the opinion of the investigator, precludes participation 11. Subject has been diagnosed with cancer in the past 2 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Relief- Change in VAS Pain Intensity From Baseline to Post ImplantationPost implantation at; 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 monthsThe visual analog is a widely accepted measure of pain intensity. VAS scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 is the minimum and 10 is the maximum score. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity (listed below are some citations to illustrate this point). An increase in VAS scores conveys an increase in pain. Jensen, Mark P., Connie Chen, and Andrew M. Brugger. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. The Journal of pain 4.7 (2003): 407-414. MPQ, M. (2011). Measures of adult pain. Arthritis Care Res., 63, S240-S252. Hawker, G. A., Mian, S., Kendzerska, T., & French, M. (2011). Measures of adult pain: Visual analog scale for pain (vas pain), numeric rating scale for pain (nrs pain), mcgill pain questionnaire (mpq), short-form mcgill pain questionnaire (sf-mpq), chronic pain grade scale (cpgs), short form-36 bodily pain scale (sf-36 bps), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treated Subjects
All subjects recruited and treated with the Axium Neurostimulator. Implantation with the commercially available Axium Neurostimulator.
135
Total135

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreated Subjects
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
13 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
122 Participants
Age, Continuous49 years
Height160 cm
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Afro-Caribbean
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Caucasian/White
130 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
135 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
77 Participants
Weight81 kg

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 135
other
Total, other adverse events
35 / 135
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 135

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Relief- Change in VAS Pain Intensity From Baseline to Post Implantation

The visual analog is a widely accepted measure of pain intensity. VAS scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 is the minimum and 10 is the maximum score. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity (listed below are some citations to illustrate this point). An increase in VAS scores conveys an increase in pain. Jensen, Mark P., Connie Chen, and Andrew M. Brugger. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. The Journal of pain 4.7 (2003): 407-414. MPQ, M. (2011). Measures of adult pain. Arthritis Care Res., 63, S240-S252. Hawker, G. A., Mian, S., Kendzerska, T., & French, M. (2011). Measures of adult pain: Visual analog scale for pain (vas pain), numeric rating scale for pain (nrs pain), mcgill pain questionnaire (mpq), short-form mcgill pain questionnaire (sf-mpq), chronic pain grade scale (cpgs), short form-36 bodily pain scale (sf-36 bps), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain.

Time frame: Post implantation at; 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months

Population: Subject attrition reduced the number of participating and analyzable subjects at all subsequent visits post-implant.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Treated SubjectsPain Relief- Change in VAS Pain Intensity From Baseline to Post Implantation6-Month Visit4.7 cmStandard Deviation 2.6
Treated SubjectsPain Relief- Change in VAS Pain Intensity From Baseline to Post ImplantationBaseline7.5 cmStandard Deviation 1.7
Treated SubjectsPain Relief- Change in VAS Pain Intensity From Baseline to Post Implantation1-Month Visit4.4 cmStandard Deviation 2.8
Treated SubjectsPain Relief- Change in VAS Pain Intensity From Baseline to Post Implantation3-Month Visit5.2 cmStandard Deviation 2.5
Treated SubjectsPain Relief- Change in VAS Pain Intensity From Baseline to Post Implantation12-Month Visit4.9 cmStandard Deviation 2.8
Treated SubjectsPain Relief- Change in VAS Pain Intensity From Baseline to Post Implantation24-Month Visit4.4 cmStandard Deviation 2.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026